Skip to content.
|
Skip to navigation
Log In
Contact Us
Report a Bug
Search Site
Connexions
Sections
Home
Content
Lenses
About Us
Help
MyCNX
You are here:
Home
»
Content
Browse by Author:
Daniel Cline
View author profile
Return to Browsing Content
|
Search for Content
Content by Daniel Cline
Other authors' collections containing modules by Daniel Cline
(What are
modules
and
collections
?)
Sort by:
Popularity
Language
Revision Date
Title
Type
Results per page:
10
25
100
View:
Detail
|
Compact
|
Statistics
Machado, C., & Cline, D. (April 2010). Faculty Perceptions: Where Do Education Administration Programs Stand with the ISLLC/ELCC Standards?
(m33637)
Authors:
Crystal Machado
,
Daniel Cline
Keywords:
educational administration programs
,
ISLLC
Summary:
Since they were launched in 1996 and endorsed by the National Commissions for Advancement in Educational Leadership Preparation (NCAELP) in 2002, the Interstate School Leadership Licensure Consortium (ISLLC) standards and the Educational Leadership Constituent Council (ELCC) standards, either directly or through state accreditation requirements, have been perpetuating programmatic change in ... and 6.
[Expand Summary]
Since they were launched in 1996 and endorsed by the National Commissions for Advancement in Educational Leadership Preparation (NCAELP) in 2002, the Interstate School Leadership Licensure Consortium (ISLLC) standards and the Educational Leadership Constituent Council (ELCC) standards, either directly or through state accreditation requirements, have been perpetuating programmatic change in school leadership preparation programs nationwide. This paper, as part of a larger mixed method study conducted in 2007, highlights the degree to which professors of educational administration in the United States perceived that their programs were aligned with the ISLLC/ ELCC standards and describes the work that can be done to ensure a higher level of program-standard alignment. Although education administration faculty perceived that their programs, on average, are well aligned with all seven standards, they indicated that their programs are better aligned with Standards 7 (internship) and 3 (management of organizational operations and resources), followed by Standard 2 (sustaining school culture and instructional program ), 1 (developing a shared vision), 5 (acting with integrity, fairness and ethics), 6 (influencing larger political, social, economic, legal and cultural context), and finally, 4 (collaboration with families and communities). Group differences were observed in the degree to which faculty perceived that their programs were aligned with the different standards, when compared across NCATE accreditation status (for Standards 5 and 6), and affiliation status (for Standards 1, 5 and 6), but not Carnegie classification status. Given the fact that schools are more inclusive and diverse places than they were 50 years ago this study challenges education administration faculty to align programs more effectively with Standards 4, 5 and 6.
[Collapse Summary]
Subject:
Social Sciences
Language:
English
Popularity:
42.26%
Revised:
2010-02-02
Revisions:
2
Popularity is measured as percentile rank of page views/day over all time
My Account
Username
Password
Cookies are not enabled. You must
enable cookies
before you can log in.
Get an account
Forgot your password?
Repository
Total Collections:
1327
Visit a random collection
Total Modules:
22027
Visit a random module