To illustrate the impedance approach, we refer to the
R
C
RC circuit (Figure 1) below,
and we assume that
v
in
=
V
in
ⅇⅈ2πft
v
in
V
in
2
f
t
.
Using impedances, the complex amplitude of the output voltage
V
out
V
out
can be found using voltage divider:
V
out
=
Z
C
Z
C
+
Z
R
V
in
V
out
Z
C
Z
C
Z
R
V
in
(1)
V
out
=1ⅈ2πfC1ⅈ2πfC+R
V
in
V
out
1
2
f
C
1
2
f
C
R
V
in
(2)
V
out
=1ⅈ2πfRC+1
V
in
V
out
1
2
f
R
C
1
V
in
(3)
If we refer to the differential equation for this circuit (shown in
Circuits with Capacitors and
Inductors to be
RCddt
V
out
+
V
out
=
V
in
R
C
t
V
out
V
out
V
in
), letting the output and input voltages be complex
exponentials, we obtain the same relationship between their complex
amplitudes. Thus, using impedances is equivalent to using the
differential equation and solving it when the source is a complex
exponential.
In fact, we can find the differential equation
directly using impedances. If we cross-multiply
the relation between input and output amplitudes,
V
out
ⅈ2πfRC+1=
V
in
V
out
2
f
R
C
1
V
in
(4)
and then put the complex exponentials back in, we have
RCⅈ2πf
V
out
ⅇⅈ2πft+
V
out
ⅇⅈ2πft=
V
in
ⅇⅈ2πft
R
C
2
f
V
out
2
f
t
V
out
2
f
t
V
in
2
f
t
(5)
In the process of defining impedances, note that the factor
ⅈ2πf
2
f
arises from the
derivative of a complex
exponential. We can reverse the impedance process, and revert back to
the differential equation.
RCddt
V
out
+
V
out
=
V
in
R
C
t
V
out
V
out
V
in
(6)
This is the same equation that was derived much more
tediously in
Circuits with
Capacitors and Inductors. Finding the differential equation
relating output to input is far simpler when we use impedances than
with any other technique.
Suppose you had an expression where a complex amplitude was divided
by
ⅈ2πf
2
f
.
How did this division arise?
Division by
ⅈ2πf
2
f
arises from integrating a complex exponential. Consequently,
1ⅈ2πfV⇔∫Vⅇⅈ2πftdt
⇔
1
2
f
V
t
V
2
f
t
(7)