Wireless channels exploit the prediction made by Maxwell's
equation that electromagnetic fields propagate in free space
like light. When a voltage is applied to an antenna, it creates
an electromagnetic field that propagates in all directions
(although antenna geometry affects how much power flows in any
given direction) that induces electric currents in the
receiver's antenna. Antenna geometry determines how energetic a
field a voltage of a given frequency creates. In general terms,
the dominant factor is the relation of the antenna's size to the
field's wavelength. The fundamental equation relating frequency
and wavelength for a propagating wave is
λf=c
λ
f
c
Thus, wavelength and frequency are inversely related: High
frequency corresponds to small wavelengths. For example, a
1 MHz electromagnetic field has a wavelength of 300 m.
Antennas having a size or distance from the ground comparable to
the wavelength radiate fields most efficiently. Consequently,
the lower the frequency the bigger the antenna must be. Because
most information signals are baseband signals, having spectral
energy at low frequencies, they must be modulated to higher
frequencies to be transmitted over wireless channels.
For most antenna-based wireless systems, how the signal
diminishes as the receiver moves further from the transmitter
derives by considering how radiated power changes with distance
from the transmitting antenna. An antenna radiates a given
amount of power into free space, and ideally this power
propagates without loss in all directions. Considering a sphere
centered at the transmitter, the total power, which is found by
integrating the radiated power over the surface of the sphere,
must be constant regardless of the sphere's radius. This
requirement results from the conservation of energy. Thus, if
pd
p
d
represents the power integrated with respect to direction at a
distance dd from the antenna, the
total power will be
pd4πd2
p
d
4
d
2
.
For this quantity to be a constant, we must have
pd∝1d2
∝
p
d
1
d
2
which means that the received signal amplitude
A
R
A
R
must be proportional to the transmitter's amplitude
A
T
A
T
and inversely related to distance from the transmitter.
A
R
=k
A
T
d
A
R
k
A
T
d
(1)
for some value of the constant
kk.
Thus, the further from the transmitter the receiver is located,
the weaker the received signal. Whereas the attenuation found
in wireline channels can be controlled by physical parameters
and choice of transmission frequency, the inverse-distance
attenuation found in wireless channels persists across all
frequencies.
Why don't signals attenuate according to the inverse-square
law in a conductor? What is the difference between the wireline
and wireless cases?
As shown previously, voltages and currents in a
wireline channel, which is modeled as a transmission line
having resistance, capacitance and inductance, decay
exponentially with distance. The inverse-square law governs
free-space propagation because such propagation is lossless,
with the inverse-square law a consequence of the
conservation of power. The exponential decay of wireline
channels occurs because they have losses and some filtering.
The speed of propagation is governed by the dielectric constant
μ
0
μ
0
and magnetic permeability
ε
0
ε
0
of free space.
c=1
μ
0
ε
0
=
3×108
m/s
c
1
μ
0
ε
0
38
m/s
(2)
Known familiarly as the speed of light, it sets an upper limit
on how fast signals can propagate from one place to another.
Because signals travel at a finite speed, a receiver senses a
transmitted signal only after a time delay inversely related to
the propagation speed:
Δt=dc
Δ
t
d
c
At the speed of light, a signal travels across the United States
in 16 ms, a reasonably small time delay. If a lossless
(zero space constant) coaxial cable connected the East and West
coasts, this delay would be two to three times longer because of
the slower propagation speed.
"Electrical Engineering Digital Processing Systems in Braille."