<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE document PUBLIC "-//CNX//DTD CNXML 0.5 plus MathML//EN" "http://cnx.rice.edu/cnxml/0.5/DTD/cnxml_mathml.dtd">
<document xmlns="http://cnx.rice.edu/cnxml" xmlns:md="http://cnx.rice.edu/mdml/0.4" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:bib="http://bibtexml.sf.net/" id="new14">
  <name>Forward Biased PN Junctions</name>
  <metadata>
  <md:version>2.19</md:version>
  <md:created>2000/08/07</md:created>
  <md:revised>2007/08/14 11:01:16.576 GMT-5</md:revised>
  <md:authorlist>
      <md:author id="wlw">
      <md:firstname>Bill</md:firstname>
      
      <md:surname>Wilson</md:surname>
      <md:email>wlw@madriver.net</md:email>
    </md:author>
  </md:authorlist>

  <md:maintainerlist>
    <md:maintainer id="wlw">
      <md:firstname>Bill</md:firstname>
      
      <md:surname>Wilson</md:surname>
      <md:email>wlw@madriver.net</md:email>
    </md:maintainer>
    <md:maintainer id="liqun">
      <md:firstname>Liqun</md:firstname>
      
      <md:surname>Wang</md:surname>
      <md:email>liqun@rice.edu</md:email>
    </md:maintainer>
    <md:maintainer id="lizzardg">
      <md:firstname>Elizabeth</md:firstname>
      
      <md:surname>Gregory</md:surname>
      <md:email>elizabeth.gregory@gmail.com</md:email>
    </md:maintainer>
    <md:maintainer id="jsilv">
      <md:firstname>Jeffrey</md:firstname>
      <md:othername>M</md:othername>
      <md:surname>Silverman</md:surname>
      <md:email>JSilverman@astro.berkeley.edu</md:email>
    </md:maintainer>
    <md:maintainer id="gerardw">
      <md:firstname>Gerard</md:firstname>
      
      <md:surname>Wysocki</md:surname>
      <md:email>gerardw@rice.edu</md:email>
    </md:maintainer>
  </md:maintainerlist>
  
  <md:keywordlist>
    <md:keyword>Fermions</md:keyword>
    <md:keyword>Forward Biased</md:keyword>
  </md:keywordlist>

  <md:abstract>Discussing the phenomenon when the diode is forward biased.</md:abstract>
</metadata>

  <content>
    <para id="contact">       
      Now let's take a look at what happens when we apply an external
      voltage to this junction. First we need some conventions. We
      make connections to the device using <term>contacts</term>,
      which we show as cross-hatched blocks. These contacts allow the
      free passage of current into and out of the device. Current
      usually flows through wires in the form of electrons, so it is
      easy to imagine electrons flowing into or out of the
      n-region. In the p-region, when electrons flow
      <emphasis>out</emphasis> of the device <emphasis>into</emphasis>
      the wire, holes will flow into the p-region (so as to maintain
      continuity of current through the contact.) When electrons flow
      into the p-region, they will recombine with holes, and so we
      have the net effect of holes flowing out of the p-region.
    </para>
      <figure id="external">
	<media type="image/png" src="2_36.png"/>
	<caption>
	  A p-n diode with contacts and external bias
	</caption>
      </figure>      
    <para id="para1">
      With the convention that a <term>positive applied voltage</term>
      means that the terminal connected to the p-region is positive
      with respect to the terminal connected to the n-region. This is easy to remember; "p is positive, n is negative". Let us
      try to figure out what will happen when we apply a positive
      applied voltage
      <m:math><m:ci><m:msub><m:mi>V</m:mi><m:mi>a</m:mi>
      </m:msub></m:ci> </m:math>.  If
      <m:math><m:ci><m:msub><m:mi>V</m:mi><m:mi>a</m:mi>
      </m:msub></m:ci> </m:math> is positive, then that means that the
      potential energy for electrons on the p-side must be
      <emphasis>lower</emphasis> than it was under the equilibrium
      condition.  We reflect this on the band diagram by
      <emphasis>lowering</emphasis> the bands on the p-side from where
      they were originally.  This is shown in <cnxn target="forward"/>.
    </para>
      <figure id="forward">
	<media type="image/png" src="2_37.png"/>
	<caption>
	  A p-n junction under forward bias
	</caption>
      </figure> 
    <para id="para2">
      As we can see from <cnxn target="forward"/>, when the p-region
      is lowered a couple of things happen.  First of all, the Fermi
      level (the dotted line) is no longer a flat line, but rather it
      bends upward in going from the p-region to the n-region.  The
      amount it bends (and hence the amount of shift of the bands) is
      just given by
      <m:math>
	<m:apply>
	  <m:times/>
	  <m:ci>q</m:ci>
	  <m:ci><m:msub>
	      <m:mi>V</m:mi>
	      <m:mi>a</m:mi>
	    </m:msub></m:ci>
	</m:apply>
      </m:math>, where the energy scale we are using for the band
      diagram is in <term>electron-volts</term> which, as we said
      before, is a common measure of potential energy when we are
      talking about electronic materials.  The other thing we can
      notice is that the electrons on the n-side and the holes on the
      p-side now "see" a lower potential energy barrier than they saw
      when no voltage was applied.  In fact, it looks as if a lot of
      electrons now have sufficient energy such that they could move
      across from the n-region and flow into the p-region.  Likewise,
      we would expect to see holes moving across from the p-region
      into the n-region.
    </para>
    <para id="flow">
      This flow of carriers across the junction will result in a
      current flow across the junction.  In order to see how this
      current will behave with applied voltage, we have to use a
      result from statistical thermodynamics concerning the
      distribution of electrons in the conduction band, and holes in
      the valence band . We saw from our "cups" analogy, that the
      electrons tend to fill in the lowest states first, with fewer
      and fewer of them as we go up in energy.  For most situations, a
      very good description of just how the electrons are distributed
      in energy is given by a simple exponential decay.  (This comes
      about from a statistical analysis of electrons, which belong to
      a class of particles called <term>Fermions</term>.  Fermions
      have the properties that they are: 
      <list id="list1" type="inline">
	<item>
	  <name>a)</name> indistinguishable from one another
	</item>
	<item>
	  <name>b)</name> obey the <term>Pauli Exclusion
	  Principle</term> which says that two Fermions can not occupy
	  the same exact <term>state</term> (energy and spin) </item>
	<item>
	  <name>c)</name> remain at some fixed total number
	  <m:math><m:ci>N</m:ci></m:math>.)
	</item>
      </list>
    </para>
    <para id="electrons">
      If 
      <m:math>
	<m:apply>
	  <m:ci type="fn">n</m:ci>
	  <m:ci>E</m:ci>
	</m:apply>
      </m:math> tells us how many electrons there are with an energy
      greater than some value
      <m:math><m:ci><m:msub><m:mi>E</m:mi><m:mi>c</m:mi>
      </m:msub></m:ci></m:math> then 
      <m:math>
	<m:apply>
	  <m:ci type="fn">n</m:ci>
	  <m:ci>E</m:ci>
	</m:apply>
      </m:math>
      is given simply as:
      <equation id="energy">
	<m:math>
	  <m:apply>
	    <m:eq/>
	    <m:apply>
	      <m:ci type="fn">n</m:ci>
	      <m:ci>E</m:ci>
	    </m:apply>
	    <m:apply>
	      <m:times/>
	      <m:ci><m:msub>
		  <m:mi>N</m:mi>
		  <m:mi>d</m:mi>
		</m:msub></m:ci>
	      <m:apply>
		<m:exp/>
		<m:apply>
		  <m:minus/>
		  <m:apply>
		    <m:divide/>
		    <m:apply>
		      <m:minus/>
		      <m:ci>E</m:ci>
		      <m:ci><m:msub>
			  <m:mi>E</m:mi>
			  <m:mi>c</m:mi>
			</m:msub></m:ci>
		    </m:apply>
		    <m:apply>
		      <m:times/>
		      <m:ci>k</m:ci>
		      <m:ci>T</m:ci>
		    </m:apply>
		  </m:apply>
		</m:apply>
	      </m:apply>
	    </m:apply>
	  </m:apply>
	</m:math>
      </equation>  
      The expression in the denominator is just Boltzman's constant
      times the temperature in Kelvins.  At room temperature
      <m:math>
	<m:apply>
	  <m:times/> 
	  <m:ci>k</m:ci> 
	  <m:ci>T</m:ci> 
	</m:apply>
      </m:math> has a value of about <m:math><m:cn type="rational">1<m:sep/>40</m:cn></m:math> of an eV or 25
      meV. This number is sometimes called the <term>thermal
      voltage</term>,
      <m:math><m:ci><m:msub><m:mi>V</m:mi><m:mi>T</m:mi>
      </m:msub></m:ci></m:math>, but it's ok for you to just think of
      it as a constant which comes from the thermodynamics of the
      problem.  Because 
      <m:math>
	<m:apply>
	  <m:approx/>
	  <m:apply>
	    <m:times/>
	    <m:ci>k</m:ci>
	    <m:ci>T</m:ci>
	  </m:apply>
	  <m:cn type="rational">1<m:sep/>40</m:cn>
	</m:apply>
      </m:math>, you will sometimes see <cnxn target="energy"/> and
      similar equations written as 
      <equation id="similar">
	<m:math>
	  <m:apply>
	    <m:eq/>
	    <m:apply>
	      <m:ci type="fn">n</m:ci>
	      <m:ci>E</m:ci>
	    </m:apply>
	    <m:apply>
	      <m:times/>
	      <m:ci><m:msub>
		  <m:mi>N</m:mi>
		  <m:mi>d</m:mi>
		</m:msub></m:ci>
	      <m:apply>
		<m:exp/>
		<m:apply>
		  <m:times/>
		  <m:cn>-40</m:cn>
		  <m:apply>
		    <m:minus/>
		    <m:ci>E</m:ci>
		    <m:ci><m:msub>
			<m:mi>E</m:mi>
			<m:mi>c</m:mi>
		      </m:msub></m:ci>
		  </m:apply>
		</m:apply>
	      </m:apply>
	    </m:apply>
	  </m:apply>
	</m:math>
      </equation>
      Which looks a little strange if you forget where the 40 came
      from, and just see it sitting there.
    </para>
    <para id="conduction">      
      If the energy <m:math><m:ci>E</m:ci></m:math> is
      <m:math><m:ci><m:msub><m:mi>E</m:mi><m:mi>c</m:mi>
      </m:msub></m:ci></m:math> the energy level of the conduction
      band, then 
      <m:math>
	<m:apply>
	  <m:eq/>
	  <m:apply>
	    <m:ci type="fn">n</m:ci>
	    <m:ci><m:msub>
		<m:mi>E</m:mi>
		<m:mi>c</m:mi>
	      </m:msub></m:ci>
	  </m:apply>
	  <m:ci><m:msub>
	      <m:mi>N</m:mi>
	      <m:mi>d</m:mi>
	    </m:msub></m:ci>
	</m:apply>
      </m:math>, the density of electrons in the n-type material.  As
      <m:math><m:ci>E</m:ci></m:math> increases above
      <m:math><m:ci><m:msub><m:mi>E</m:mi><m:mi>c</m:mi>
      </m:msub></m:ci></m:math>, the density of electrons falls off
      exponentially, as depicted schematically in <cnxn target="distribution"/>: Now let's go back to the unbiased
      junction.
    </para>
      <figure id="distribution">
	<media type="image/png" src="2_38.png"/> 
	<caption>	
	  Distribution of electrons in the conduction band with energy
	</caption>
      </figure>
    <para id="para3">
      Remember, as we said before, there are currents flowing across
      the junction, even if there is no bias.  The current we have
      shown as <m:math><m:ci><m:msub><m:mi>I</m:mi><m:mi>f</m:mi>
      </m:msub></m:ci></m:math> is due to those electrons which have
      an energy greater than the built-in potential.  They are flowing
      from right to left, as shown by the open arrow, which, of
      course, gives a current flowing from left to right, as shown by
      the solid arrows.  Based on <cnxn target="energy"/> the current
      should be proportional to:
      <equation id="current">
	<m:math>
	  <m:apply>
	    <m:mo>∝</m:mo>
	    <m:ci><m:msub>
		<m:mi>I</m:mi>
		<m:mi>f</m:mi>
	      </m:msub></m:ci>
	    <m:apply>
	      <m:times/>
	      <m:ci><m:msub>
		  <m:mi>N</m:mi>
		  <m:mi>d</m:mi>
		</m:msub></m:ci>
	      <m:apply>
		<m:exp/>
		<m:apply>
		  <m:minus/>
		  <m:apply>
		    <m:divide/>
		    <m:apply>
		      <m:times/>
		      <m:ci>q</m:ci>
		      <m:ci><m:msub>
			  <m:mi>V</m:mi>
			  <m:mi>bi</m:mi>
			</m:msub></m:ci>
		    </m:apply>
		    <m:apply>
		      <m:times/>
		      <m:ci>k</m:ci>
		      <m:ci>T</m:ci>
		    </m:apply>
		  </m:apply>
		</m:apply>
	      </m:apply>
	    </m:apply>
	  </m:apply>
	</m:math>
      </equation>
      <figure id="balancedflow">
	<media type="image/png" src="2_39.png"/>
	<caption>Balanced flow across a junction</caption>
      </figure>      
      The principle of detailed balance says that at zero bias,
      <m:math>
	<m:apply>
	  <m:eq/>
	  <m:ci><m:msub>
	      <m:mi>I</m:mi>
	      <m:mi>f</m:mi>
	    </m:msub></m:ci>
	  <m:apply>
	    <m:minus/>
	    <m:ci><m:msub>
		<m:mi>I</m:mi>
		<m:mi>r</m:mi>
	      </m:msub></m:ci>
	  </m:apply>
	</m:apply>
      </m:math> and so 
      <equation id="currentneg">
	<m:math>
	  <m:apply>
	    <m:mo>∝</m:mo>
	    <m:ci><m:msub>
		<m:mi>I</m:mi>
		<m:mi>R</m:mi>
	      </m:msub></m:ci>
	    <m:apply>
	      <m:minus/>
	      <m:apply>
		<m:times/>
		<m:ci><m:msub>
		    <m:mi>N</m:mi>
		    <m:mi>d</m:mi>
		  </m:msub></m:ci>
		<m:apply>
		  <m:exp/>
		  <m:apply>
		    <m:minus/>
		    <m:apply>
		      <m:divide/>
		      <m:apply>
			<m:times/>
			<m:ci>q</m:ci>
			<m:ci><m:msub>
			    <m:mi>V</m:mi>
			    <m:mi>bi</m:mi>
			  </m:msub></m:ci>
		      </m:apply>
		      <m:apply>
			<m:times/>
			<m:ci>k</m:ci>
			<m:ci>T</m:ci>
		      </m:apply>
		    </m:apply>
		  </m:apply>
		</m:apply>
	      </m:apply>
	    </m:apply>
	  </m:apply>
	</m:math>
      </equation>     
      <equation id="eq1">
	<m:math>
	  <m:apply>
	    <m:eq/>
	    <m:ci><m:msub>
		<m:mi>I</m:mi>
		<m:mi>R</m:mi>
	      </m:msub></m:ci>
	    <m:apply>
	      <m:minus/>
	      <m:apply>
		<m:minus/>
		<m:apply>
		  <m:times/>
		  <m:ci><m:msub>
		      <m:mi>I</m:mi>
		      <m:mi>f</m:mi>
		    </m:msub></m:ci>
		  <m:ci>α</m:ci>
		</m:apply>
	      </m:apply>
	      <m:apply>
		<m:times/>
		<m:ci><m:msub>
		    <m:mi>N</m:mi>
		    <m:mi>d</m:mi>
		  </m:msub></m:ci>
		<m:apply>
		  <m:exp/>
		  <m:apply>
		    <m:minus/>
		    <m:apply>
		      <m:divide/>
		      <m:apply>
			<m:times/>
			<m:ci>q</m:ci>
			<m:ci><m:msub>
			    <m:mi>V</m:mi>
			    <m:mi>BI</m:mi>
			  </m:msub></m:ci>
		      </m:apply>
		      <m:apply>
			<m:times/>
			<m:ci>k</m:ci>
			<m:ci>T</m:ci>
		      </m:apply>
		    </m:apply>
		  </m:apply>
		</m:apply>
	      </m:apply>
	    </m:apply>
	  </m:apply>
	</m:math>
      </equation>
    </para>
    <para id="para4">
      Now, what happens when we apply the bias?  For the electrons
      over on the n-side, the barrier has been reduced from a height
      of 
      <m:math>
	<m:apply>
	  <m:times/>
	  <m:ci>q</m:ci>
	  <m:ci><m:msub>
	      <m:mi>V</m:mi>
	      <m:mi>bi</m:mi>
	    </m:msub></m:ci>
	</m:apply>
      </m:math> to 
      <m:math>
	<m:apply>
	  <m:times/>
	  <m:ci>q</m:ci>
	  <m:apply>
	    <m:minus/>
	    <m:ci><m:msub>
		<m:mi>V</m:mi>
		<m:mi>bi</m:mi>
	      </m:msub></m:ci>
	    <m:ci><m:msub>
		<m:mi>V</m:mi>
		<m:mi>a</m:mi>
	      </m:msub></m:ci>
	  </m:apply>
	</m:apply>
      </m:math> and hence the forward current will be significantly
      increased.
      <equation id="increased">
	<m:math>
	  <m:apply>
	    <m:mo>∝</m:mo>
	    <m:ci><m:msub>
		<m:mi>I</m:mi>
		<m:mi>f</m:mi>
	      </m:msub></m:ci>
	    <m:apply>
	      <m:times/>
	      <m:ci><m:msub>
		  <m:mi>N</m:mi>
		  <m:mi>d</m:mi>
		</m:msub></m:ci>
	      <m:apply>
		<m:exp/>
		<m:apply>
		  <m:minus/>
		  <m:apply>
		    <m:divide/>
		    <m:apply>
		      <m:times/>
		      <m:ci>q</m:ci>
		      <m:apply>
			<m:minus/>
			<m:ci><m:msub>
			    <m:mi>V</m:mi>
			    <m:mi>bi</m:mi>
			  </m:msub></m:ci>
			<m:ci><m:msub>
			    <m:mi>V</m:mi>
			    <m:mi>a</m:mi>
			  </m:msub></m:ci>
		      </m:apply>
		    </m:apply>
		    <m:apply>
		      <m:times/>
		      <m:ci>k</m:ci>
		      <m:ci>T</m:ci>
		    </m:apply>
		  </m:apply>
		</m:apply>
	      </m:apply>
	    </m:apply>
	  </m:apply>
	</m:math>
      </equation> 
      The reverse current however, will remain just the <cnxn target="currentneg">same as it was before</cnxn>.
      <figure id="forwardbias">
	<media type="image/png" src="2_40.png"/>
	<caption>Current when the junction is forward biased</caption>
      </figure>      
      The total current across the junction is just
      <m:math>
	<m:apply>
	  <m:plus/>
	  <m:ci><m:msub>
	      <m:mi>I</m:mi>
	      <m:mi>f</m:mi>
	    </m:msub></m:ci>
	  <m:ci><m:msub>
	      <m:mi>I</m:mi>
	      <m:mi>r</m:mi>
	    </m:msub></m:ci>
	</m:apply>
      </m:math>
      <equation id="total">
	<m:math>
	  <m:apply>
	    <m:times/>
	    <m:ci><m:msub>
		<m:mi>N</m:mi>
		<m:mi>d</m:mi>
	      </m:msub></m:ci>
	    <m:apply>
	      <m:minus/>
	      <m:apply>
		<m:exp/>
		  <m:apply>
		  <m:divide/>
		  <m:apply>
		    <m:times/>
		    <m:ci>q</m:ci>
		    <m:ci><m:msub>
			<m:mi>V</m:mi>
			<m:mi>a</m:mi>
		      </m:msub></m:ci>
		  </m:apply>
		  <m:apply>
		    <m:times/>
		    <m:ci>k</m:ci>
		    <m:ci>T</m:ci>
		  </m:apply>
		</m:apply>
	      </m:apply>
	      <m:cn>1</m:cn>
	    </m:apply>
	  </m:apply>
	</m:math>
      </equation>
      where we have factored out the
      <m:math>
	<m:apply>
	  <m:times/>
	  <m:ci><m:msub>
	      <m:mi>N</m:mi>
	      <m:mi>d</m:mi>
	    </m:msub></m:ci>
	  <m:apply>
	    <m:exp/>
	    <m:apply>
	      <m:minus/>
	      <m:apply>
		<m:divide/>
		<m:apply>
		  <m:times/>
		  <m:ci>q</m:ci>
		  <m:ci><m:msub>
		      <m:mi>V</m:mi>
		      <m:mi>bi</m:mi>
		    </m:msub></m:ci>
		</m:apply>
		<m:apply>
		  <m:times/>
		  <m:ci>k</m:ci>
		  <m:ci>T</m:ci>
		</m:apply>
	      </m:apply>
	    </m:apply>
	  </m:apply>
	</m:apply>
      </m:math> term out of both expressions.  We are not prepared,
      with what we know at this point, to get the other terms in the
      proportionality that are involved here.  Also, the astute reader
      will note that we have not said anything about the holes, but it
      should be obvious that they will also contribute to the current,
      and the arguments we have made for electrons will hold for the
      holes just as well.
    </para>
    <para id="effect"> We can take the effect of the holes, and the
      other unknowns about the proportionality, and bind them all into
      one constant called
      <m:math><m:ci><m:msub><m:mi>I</m:mi><m:mi>sat</m:mi>
      </m:msub></m:ci></m:math>, so that we write:
      <equation id="final">
	<m:math>
	  <m:apply>
	    <m:eq/>
	    <m:ci>I</m:ci>
	    <m:apply>
	      <m:times/>
	      <m:ci><m:msub>
		  <m:mi>I</m:mi>
		  <m:mi>sat</m:mi>
		</m:msub></m:ci>
	      <m:apply>
		<m:minus/>
		<m:apply>
		  <m:exp/>
		  <m:apply>
		    <m:divide/>
		    <m:apply>
		      <m:times/>
		      <m:ci>q</m:ci>
		      <m:ci><m:msub>
			  <m:mi>V</m:mi>
			  <m:mi>a</m:mi>
			</m:msub></m:ci>
		    </m:apply>
		    <m:apply>
		      <m:times/>
		      <m:ci>k</m:ci>
		      <m:ci>T</m:ci>
		    </m:apply>
		  </m:apply>
		</m:apply>
		<m:cn>1</m:cn>
	      </m:apply>
	    </m:apply>
	  </m:apply>
	</m:math>
      </equation> This is the famous <term>diode equation</term> and
      is a very important result.

</para> </content> </document>
