Skip to content Skip to navigation

Connexions

You are here: Home » Content » The Backward-Euler Method

Navigation

Content Actions

  • Download module PDF
  • Add to ...
    Add the module to:
    • My Favorites
    • A lens
    • An external social bookmarking service
    • My Favorites (What is 'My Favorites'?)
      'My Favorites' is a special kind of lens which you can use to bookmark modules and collections directly in Connexions. 'My Favorites' can only be seen by you, and collections saved in 'My Favorites' can remember the last module you were on. You need a Connexions account to use 'My Favorites'.
    • A lens (What is a lens?)

      Definition of a lens

      Lenses

      A lens is a custom view of Connexions content. You can think of it as a fancy kind of list that will let you see Connexions through the eyes of organizations and people you trust.

      What is in a lens?

      Lens makers point to Connexions materials (modules and collections), creating a guide that includes their own comments and descriptive tags about the content.

      Who can create a lens?

      Any individual Connexions member, a community, or a respected organization.

      What are tags? tag icon

      Tags are descriptors added by lens makers to help label content, attaching a vocabulary that is meaningful in the context of the lens.

    • External bookmarks
  • E-mail the authors
  • Rate this module (How does the rating system work?)

    Rating system

    Ratings

    Ratings allow you to judge the quality of modules. If other users have ranked the module then its average rating is displayed below. Ratings are calculated on a scale from one star (Poor) to five stars (Excellent).

    How to rate a module

    Hover over the star that corresponds to the rating you wish to assign. Click on the star to add your rating. Your rating should be based on the quality of the content. You must have an account and be logged in to rate content.

    (0 ratings)

Recently Viewed

This feature requires Javascript to be enabled.

The Backward-Euler Method

Module by: Doug Daniels, Steven Cox

Summary: This module examines the Backward-Euler method, which uses a finite difference quotient to approximate the solution of a time-dependent system of equations. This module is a continuation of the nerve fiber example introduced in the dynamic Strang quartet module.

Note: Your browser may not currently support MathML. See our browser support page for additional details. You can always view the correct math in the PDF version.

Where in the Inverse Laplace Transform module we tackled the derivative in

x =Bx+g , x B x g , (1)
via an integral transform we pursue in this section a much simpler strategy, namely, replace the derivative with a finite difference quotient. That is, one chooses a small d t d t and 'replaces' Equation 1 with
x ˜ t x ˜ t d t d t =B x ˜ t+gt . x ˜ t x ˜ t d t d t B x ˜ t g t . (2)
The utility of Equation 2 is that it gives a means of solving for x ˜ x ˜ at the present time, tt, from the knowledge of x ˜ x ˜ in the immediate past, t d t t d t . For example, as x ˜ 0=x0 x ˜ 0 x 0 is supposed known we write Equation 2 as I d t B x ˜ dt=x0dt+gdt . I d t B x ˜ dt x 0 dt g dt . Solving this for x ˜ dt x ˜ dt we return to Equation 2 and find IdtB x ˜ 2dt=xdtdt+g2dt . I dt B x ˜ 2 dt x dt dt g 2 dt . and solve for x ˜ 2dt x ˜ 2 dt . The general step from past to present,
x ˜ jdt=IdtB-1 x ˜ j1 d t d t +gjdt x ˜ j dt I dt B x ˜ j 1 d t d t g j dt (3)
is repeated until some desired final time, Tdt T dt , is reached. This equation has been implemented in fib3.m with dt=1 dt 1 and BB and gg as in the dynamic Strang module. The resulting x ˜ x ˜ ( run fib3.m yourself!) is indistinguishable from the plot we obtained in the Inverse Laplace module.

Comparing the two representations, this equation and Equation 3, we see that they both produce the solution to the general linear system of ordinary equations, see this eqn, by simply inverting a shifted copy of BB. The former representation is hard but exact while the latter is easy but approximate. Of course we should expect the approximate solution, x ˜ x ˜ , to approach the exact solution, xx, as the time step, dt dt , approaches zero. To see this let us return to Equation 3 and assume, for now, that g0 g 0 . In this case, one can reverse the above steps and arrive at the representation

x ˜ jdt=I dt B-1jx0 x ˜ j dt I dt B j x 0 (4)
Now, for a fixed time tt we suppose that dt =tj dt t j and ask whether xt=limjItjB-1jx0 x t j I t j B j x 0 This limit, at least when BB is one-by-one, yields the exponential xt=Btx0 x t B t x 0 clearly the correct solution to this equation. A careful explication of the matrix exponential and its relationship to this equation will have to wait until we have mastered the inverse laplace transform.

Comments, questions, feedback, criticisms?

Send feedback