<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE document PUBLIC "-//CNX//DTD CNXML 0.5 plus MathML//EN" "http://cnx.rice.edu/cnxml/0.5/DTD/cnxml_mathml.dtd">
<document xmlns="http://cnx.rice.edu/cnxml" xmlns:md="http://cnx.rice.edu/mdml/0.4" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:bib="http://bibtexml.sf.net/" id="new50">
  <name>Plotting MOS I-V</name>
  <metadata>
  <md:version>2.13</md:version>
  <md:created>2000/08/04</md:created>
  <md:revised>2007/08/14 11:51:32.540 GMT-5</md:revised>
  <md:authorlist>
      <md:author id="wlw">
      <md:firstname>Bill</md:firstname>
      
      <md:surname>Wilson</md:surname>
      <md:email>wlw@madriver.net</md:email>
    </md:author>
  </md:authorlist>

  <md:maintainerlist>
    <md:maintainer id="wlw">
      <md:firstname>Bill</md:firstname>
      
      <md:surname>Wilson</md:surname>
      <md:email>wlw@madriver.net</md:email>
    </md:maintainer>
    <md:maintainer id="liqun">
      <md:firstname>Liqun</md:firstname>
      
      <md:surname>Wang</md:surname>
      <md:email>liqun@rice.edu</md:email>
    </md:maintainer>
    <md:maintainer id="lizzardg">
      <md:firstname>Elizabeth</md:firstname>
      
      <md:surname>Gregory</md:surname>
      <md:email>elizabeth.gregory@gmail.com</md:email>
    </md:maintainer>
    <md:maintainer id="jsilv">
      <md:firstname>Jeffrey</md:firstname>
      <md:othername>M</md:othername>
      <md:surname>Silverman</md:surname>
      <md:email>JSilverman@astro.berkeley.edu</md:email>
    </md:maintainer>
    <md:maintainer id="gerardw">
      <md:firstname>Gerard</md:firstname>
      
      <md:surname>Wysocki</md:surname>
      <md:email>gerardw@rice.edu</md:email>
    </md:maintainer>
  </md:maintainerlist>
  
  <md:keywordlist>
    <md:keyword>Plotting MOS I-V</md:keyword>
  </md:keywordlist>

  <md:abstract>Plotting MOS I-V, and sketching the I-V behavior.</md:abstract>
</metadata>

  <content>
    <para id="para1">
      Now we use two of the equations (<cnxn document="m1024" target="eqn41"/> and <cnxn document="m1024" target="eqn45"/>)
      that we found in the discussion about <cnxn document="m1024">MOS Regimes</cnxn> to calculate a set of
      <m:math><m:ci><m:msub><m:mi>V</m:mi><m:mi>dsat</m:mi>
      </m:msub></m:ci></m:math> and
      <m:math><m:ci><m:msub><m:mi>I</m:mi><m:mi>dsat</m:mi>
      </m:msub></m:ci></m:math> values for various value of
      <m:math><m:ci><m:msub><m:mi>V</m:mi><m:mi>gs</m:mi>
      </m:msub></m:ci></m:math>.  (Note that
      <m:math><m:ci><m:msub><m:mi>V</m:mi><m:mi>gs</m:mi>
      </m:msub></m:ci></m:math> must be greater than
      <m:math><m:ci><m:msub><m:mi>V</m:mi><m:mi>T</m:mi>
      </m:msub></m:ci></m:math> for the two equations to be valid.)
      When we get the numbers, we build a little table.
    </para>


    <para id="para2">
      Once we have <cnxn target="fig24">the numbers</cnxn>, then we
      sketch a piece of graph paper with the proper scale, and <cnxn target="fig25">plot the points</cnxn> on it. Once the
      <m:math><m:ci><m:msub><m:mi>I</m:mi><m:mi>dsat</m:mi>
      </m:msub></m:ci></m:math>,
      <m:math><m:ci><m:msub><m:mi>V</m:mi><m:mi>dsat</m:mi>
      </m:msub></m:ci></m:math> points have been determined, it is
      easy to sketch in the I-V behavior. You just draw a curve from
      the origin up to any given point, having it "peak out" just at
      the dot, and then draw a straight line at
      <m:math><m:ci><m:msub><m:mi>I</m:mi><m:mi>dsat</m:mi>
      </m:msub></m:ci></m:math> to finish things off. One such curve
      is shown in <cnxn target="fig26"/>. And then finally in <cnxn target="fig27"/> they are all sketched in. Your curves probably
      wont be exactly right but they will be good enough for a lot of
      applications.
    </para>


    <figure id="fig24">

      <!-- This CALS table template is generated by `table.el' version 1.5.32 -->
      <table frame="all" id="table1">
	<tgroup cols="3" align="left" colsep="1" rowsep="1">
	  <thead valign="top">
	    <row>
	      <entry>
		<m:math><m:ci><m:msub>
		      <m:mi>V</m:mi>
		      <m:mi>gs</m:mi>
		    </m:msub></m:ci></m:math>
	      </entry>
	      <entry>
		<m:math><m:apply> <m:ci type="fn"><m:msub><m:mi>V</m:mi>
			<m:mi>dsat</m:mi></m:msub></m:ci>
		    <m:ci>V</m:ci></m:apply></m:math>
	      </entry>
	      <entry>
		<m:math><m:apply><m:ci type="fn"><m:msub><m:mi>V</m:mi>
			<m:mi>dsat</m:mi></m:msub></m:ci>
		    <m:ci>mA</m:ci></m:apply></m:math>
	      </entry>
	    </row>
	  </thead>
	  <tbody valign="top">
	    <row>
	      <entry>
		3
	      </entry>
	      <entry>
		1
	      </entry>
	      <entry>
		0.44
	      </entry>
	    </row>
	    <row>
	      <entry>
		4
	      </entry>
	      <entry>
		2
	      </entry>
	      <entry>
		1.76
	      </entry>
	    </row>
	    <row>
	      <entry>
		5
	      </entry>
	      <entry>
		3
	      </entry>
	      <entry>
		3.96
	      </entry>
	    </row>
	    <row>
	      <entry>
		6
	      </entry>
	      <entry>
		4
	      </entry>
	      <entry>
		7.04
	      </entry>
	    </row>
	    <row>
	      <entry>
		7
	      </entry>
	      <entry>
		5
	      </entry>
	      <entry>
		11
	      </entry>
	    </row>
	  </tbody>
	</tgroup>
      </table>

      <caption>Results of calculating
	<m:math><m:ci><m:msub><m:mi>V</m:mi><m:mi>dsat</m:mi>
	</m:msub></m:ci></m:math> and
	<m:math><m:ci><m:msub><m:mi>I</m:mi><m:mi>dsat</m:mi>
	</m:msub></m:ci></m:math>.</caption>
    </figure>


    <figure id="fig25">
      <media src="4.25.png" type="image/png"/> <caption>Plotting
      <m:math><m:ci><m:msub><m:mi>I</m:mi><m:mi>dsat</m:mi>
      </m:msub></m:ci></m:math> and
      <m:math><m:ci><m:msub><m:mi>V</m:mi><m:mi>dsat</m:mi>
      </m:msub></m:ci></m:math>.</caption>
    </figure>


    <figure id="fig26">
      <media src="4.26.png" type="image/png"/>
      <caption>Sketching in one of the I-V curves.</caption>
    </figure>


    <figure id="fig27">
      <media src="4.27.png" type="image/png"/>
      <caption>The complete set of curves.</caption>
    </figure>


    <para id="para3">
      There is a particularly easy way to measure by
      <m:math><m:ci>k</m:ci></m:math> and
      <m:math><m:ci><m:msub><m:mi>V</m:mi><m:mi>T</m:mi>
      </m:msub></m:ci></m:math> for a MOSFET. Let's first introduce
      the schematic symbol for the MOSFET, it looks like <cnxn target="fig28"/>. Let's take a MOSFET and hook it up as shown in
      <cnxn target="fig29"/>.
    </para>


    <figure id="fig28">
      <media src="4.28.png" type="image/png"/>
      <caption>Schematic symbol for a MOSFET </caption>
    </figure>


    <figure id="fig29">
      <media src="4.29.png" type="image/png"/> <caption>Circuit for
      finding <m:math><m:ci><m:msub><m:mi>V</m:mi><m:mi>T</m:mi>
      </m:msub></m:ci></m:math> and
      <m:math><m:ci>k</m:ci></m:math></caption>
    </figure>


    <para id="para4">
      Since the gate of this transistor is connected to the drain,
      there is no doubt that
      <m:math>
	<m:apply>
	  <m:minus/>
	  <m:ci>
	    <m:msub>
	      <m:mi>V</m:mi>
	      <m:mi>gs</m:mi>
	    </m:msub>
	  </m:ci>
	  <m:ci>
	    <m:msub>
	      <m:mi>V</m:mi>
	      <m:mi>ds</m:mi>
	    </m:msub>
	  </m:ci>
	</m:apply>
      </m:math> is less than
      <m:math><m:ci><m:msub><m:mi>V</m:mi><m:mi>T</m:mi>
      </m:msub></m:ci></m:math>.  In fact, since
      <m:math>
	<m:apply>
	  <m:eq/>
	  <m:ci>
	    <m:msub>
	      <m:mi>V</m:mi>
	      <m:mi>gs</m:mi>
	    </m:msub>
	  </m:ci>
	  <m:ci>
	    <m:msub>
	      <m:mi>V</m:mi>
	      <m:mi>ds</m:mi>
	    </m:msub>
	  </m:ci>
	</m:apply>
      </m:math>
      , their difference, is zero. Thus, for any value of
      <m:math><m:ci><m:msub><m:mi>V</m:mi><m:mi>ds</m:mi>
      </m:msub></m:ci></m:math>, this transistor is operating in its
      saturated condition. Since
      <m:math>
	<m:apply>
	  <m:eq/>
	  <m:ci>
	    <m:msub>
	      <m:mi>V</m:mi>
	      <m:mi>gs</m:mi>
	    </m:msub>
	  </m:ci>
	  <m:ci>
	    <m:msub>
	      <m:mi>V</m:mi>
	      <m:mi>ds</m:mi>
	    </m:msub>
	  </m:ci>
	</m:apply>
      </m:math>, we can rewrite <cnxn document="m1023" target="eqn33">a previous equation</cnxn> derived equation from
      the section on <cnxn document="m1023">MOS transistor</cnxn> as

      <equation id="eqn47">
	<m:math>
	  <m:apply>
	    <m:eq/>
	    <m:ci>
	      <m:msub>
		<m:mi>I</m:mi>
		<m:mi>d</m:mi>
	      </m:msub>
	    </m:ci>

	    <m:apply>
	      <m:times/>
	      <m:apply>
		<m:divide/>
		<m:ci>k</m:ci>
		<m:cn>2</m:cn>
	      </m:apply>

	      <m:apply>
		<m:power/>
		<m:apply>
		  <m:minus/>
		  <m:ci>
		    <m:msub>
		      <m:mi>V</m:mi>
		      <m:mi>ds</m:mi>
		    </m:msub>
		  </m:ci>
		  <m:ci>
		    <m:msub>
		      <m:mi>V</m:mi>
		      <m:mi>T</m:mi>
		    </m:msub>
		  </m:ci>
		</m:apply>
		<m:cn>2</m:cn>
	      </m:apply>
	    </m:apply>
	  </m:apply>
	</m:math>
      </equation>
    </para>


    <para id="para5">
      Now let's take the square root of both sides:

      <equation id="eqn48">
	<m:math>
	  <m:apply>
	    <m:eq/>
	    <m:apply>
	      <m:root/>
	      <m:ci>
		<m:msub>
		  <m:mi>I</m:mi>
		  <m:mi>d</m:mi>
		</m:msub>
	      </m:ci>
	    </m:apply>

	    <m:apply>
	      <m:times/>
	      <m:apply>
		<m:root/>
		<m:apply>
		  <m:divide/>
		  <m:ci>k</m:ci>
		  <m:cn>2</m:cn>
		</m:apply>
	      </m:apply>
	      <m:apply>
		<m:minus/>
		<m:ci>
		  <m:msub>
		    <m:mi>V</m:mi>
		    <m:mi>ds</m:mi>
		  </m:msub>
		</m:ci>
		<m:ci>
		  <m:msub>
		    <m:mi>V</m:mi>
		    <m:mi>T</m:mi>
		  </m:msub>
		</m:ci>
	      </m:apply>
	    </m:apply>
	  </m:apply>

	</m:math>
      </equation>
    </para>


    <para id="para6">
      So if we make a <cnxn target="fig30">plot</cnxn> of
      <m:math>
	<m:apply>
	  <m:root/>
	  <m:ci>
	    <m:msub>
	      <m:mi>I</m:mi>
	      <m:mi>d</m:mi>
	    </m:msub>
	  </m:ci>
	</m:apply>
      </m:math> as a function of
      <m:math><m:ci><m:msub><m:mi>V</m:mi><m:mi>ds</m:mi>
      </m:msub></m:ci></m:math>, we should get a straight line, with a
      slope of
      <m:math>
	<m:apply>
	  <m:root/>
	  <m:apply>
	    <m:divide/>
	    <m:ci>k</m:ci>
	    <m:cn>2</m:cn>
	  </m:apply>
	</m:apply>
      </m:math> and an x-intercept of
      <m:math><m:ci><m:msub><m:mi>V</m:mi><m:mi>T</m:mi>
      </m:msub></m:ci></m:math>.
    </para>


    <figure id="fig30">
      <media src="4.30.png" type="image/png"/> <caption>Obtaining
      <m:math><m:ci><m:msub><m:mi>V</m:mi><m:mi>T</m:mi>
      </m:msub></m:ci></m:math> and
      <m:math><m:ci>k</m:ci></m:math></caption>
    </figure>


    <para id="para7">
      Because of the expected non-ideality, the curve does not go all
      the way to <m:math><m:ci><m:msub><m:mi>V</m:mi><m:mi>T</m:mi>
      </m:msub></m:ci></m:math>, but deviates a bit near the bottom. A
      simple linear extrapolation of the straight part of the plot
      however, yields an unambiguous value for the threshold voltage
      <m:math><m:ci><m:msub><m:mi>V</m:mi><m:mi>T</m:mi>
      </m:msub></m:ci></m:math>.
    </para>



  </content>
  
</document>
