<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE document PUBLIC "-//CNX//DTD CNXML 0.5 plus MathML//EN" "http://cnx.rice.edu/cnxml/0.5/DTD/cnxml_mathml.dtd">
<document xmlns="http://cnx.rice.edu/cnxml" xmlns:md="http://cnx.rice.edu/mdml/0.4" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:bib="http://bibtexml.sf.net/" id="new51">
  <name>Models</name>
  <metadata>
  <md:version>2.11</md:version>
  <md:created>2000/08/04</md:created>
  <md:revised>2007/08/21 18:33:22.297 GMT-5</md:revised>
  <md:authorlist>
      <md:author id="wlw">
      <md:firstname>Bill</md:firstname>
      
      <md:surname>Wilson</md:surname>
      <md:email>wlw@madriver.net</md:email>
    </md:author>
  </md:authorlist>

  <md:maintainerlist>
    <md:maintainer id="wlw">
      <md:firstname>Bill</md:firstname>
      
      <md:surname>Wilson</md:surname>
      <md:email>wlw@madriver.net</md:email>
    </md:maintainer>
    <md:maintainer id="liqun">
      <md:firstname>Liqun</md:firstname>
      
      <md:surname>Wang</md:surname>
      <md:email>liqun@rice.edu</md:email>
    </md:maintainer>
    <md:maintainer id="lizzardg">
      <md:firstname>Elizabeth</md:firstname>
      
      <md:surname>Gregory</md:surname>
      <md:email>elizabeth.gregory@gmail.com</md:email>
    </md:maintainer>
    <md:maintainer id="jsilv">
      <md:firstname>Jeffrey</md:firstname>
      <md:othername>M</md:othername>
      <md:surname>Silverman</md:surname>
      <md:email>JSilverman@astro.berkeley.edu</md:email>
    </md:maintainer>
    <md:maintainer id="gerardw">
      <md:firstname>Gerard</md:firstname>
      
      <md:surname>Wysocki</md:surname>
      <md:email>gerardw@rice.edu</md:email>
    </md:maintainer>
  </md:maintainerlist>
  
  <md:keywordlist>
    <md:keyword>Model</md:keyword>
  </md:keywordlist>

  <md:abstract>Introducing MOSEFT model, discussing its several advantages over the bipolar transistor.</md:abstract>
</metadata>

  <content>
    <para id="para1">
      A second, and some people think more accurate, way to find
      <m:math><m:ci><m:msub><m:mi>V</m:mi><m:mi>T</m:mi>
      </m:msub></m:ci></m:math> is to look at the characteristics of
      the MOS transistor in is <term>linear regime</term>. The test
      circuit looks like what you see in <cnxn target="fig31"/>. In
      this case, <m:math><m:ci><m:msub><m:mi>V</m:mi><m:mi>ds</m:mi>
      </m:msub></m:ci></m:math> is kept quite small (0.2 Volts or so)
      and the gate voltage
      <m:math><m:ci><m:msub><m:mi>V</m:mi><m:mi>gs</m:mi>
      </m:msub></m:ci></m:math> is swept over some range. If you look
      back at <cnxn document="m1023" target="eqn35">equation in
      another module</cnxn>, which we can slightly re-write we see
      that

      <equation id="eqn49">
	<m:math>
	  <m:apply>
	    <m:eq/>
	    <m:ci>
	      <m:msub>
		<m:mi>I</m:mi>
		<m:mi>d</m:mi>
	      </m:msub>
	    </m:ci>

	    <m:apply>
	      <m:times/>
	      <m:apply>
		<m:divide/>
		<m:apply>
		  <m:times/>
		  <m:ci>
		    <m:msub>
		      <m:mi>μ</m:mi>
		      <m:mi>s</m:mi>
		    </m:msub>
		  </m:ci>
		  <m:ci>
		    <m:msub>
		      <m:mi>c</m:mi>
		      <m:mi>ox</m:mi>
		    </m:msub>
		  </m:ci>
		  <m:ci>W</m:ci>
		  <m:ci>
		    <m:msub>
		      <m:mi>V</m:mi>
		      <m:mi>ds</m:mi>
		    </m:msub>
		  </m:ci>
		</m:apply>
		<m:ci>L</m:ci>
	      </m:apply>

	      <m:apply>
		<m:minus/>
		<m:ci>
		  <m:msub>
		    <m:mi>V</m:mi>
		    <m:mi>gs</m:mi>
		  </m:msub>
		</m:ci>
		<m:ci>
		  <m:msub>
		    <m:mi>V</m:mi>
		    <m:mi>T</m:mi>
		  </m:msub>
		</m:ci>
	      </m:apply>
	    </m:apply>
	  </m:apply>
	</m:math>
      </equation>

      This equation will obviously give us a linear plot of
      <m:math><m:ci><m:msub><m:mi>I</m:mi><m:mi>d</m:mi>
      </m:msub></m:ci></m:math> as a function of
      <m:math><m:ci><m:msub><m:mi>V</m:mi><m:mi>gs</m:mi>
      </m:msub></m:ci></m:math>, which will look something like <cnxn target="fig32"/>. Obviously, this is a device with
      a threshold voltage of about 2 volts. Can you figure out what
      <m:math><m:ci>k</m:ci></m:math> is for this transistor? If not,
      go back a re-read some stuff.
    </para>


    <figure id="fig31">
      <media type="image/png" src="4.31.png"/> <caption>Circuit for
      finding <m:math><m:ci><m:msub><m:mi>V</m:mi><m:mi>T</m:mi>
      </m:msub></m:ci></m:math>
      </caption>
    </figure>


    <figure id="fig32">
      <media type="image/png" src="4.32.png"/>
      <caption><m:math><m:ci><m:msub><m:mi>I</m:mi><m:mi>d</m:mi>
      </m:msub></m:ci></m:math> as a function of
      <m:math><m:ci><m:msub><m:mi>V</m:mi><m:mi>gs</m:mi>
      </m:msub></m:ci></m:math> for a MOS transistor in its linear
      range.
      </caption>
    </figure>


    <para id="para2">
      Now let's address a fundamental question concerning all of this:
      So What? What do we have here? One answer is that we have
      another device which in some way looks like the bipolar
      transistor we studied in the last chapter. In the saturation
      regime, the device looks and acts like a current source, and
      could probably be used as an amplifier. It is pretty easy to
      make a small signal model. The drain acts like a current source,
      which is controlled by
      <m:math><m:ci><m:msub><m:mi>V</m:mi><m:mi>gs</m:mi>
      </m:msub></m:ci></m:math>.  What should we do about the gate
      terminal? The gate really is not connected to anything inside
      the transistor, so it looks just like an open circuit. (In fact,
      there is a capacitance
      <m:math>
	<m:apply>
	  <m:eq/>
	  <m:ci>
	    <m:msub>
	      <m:mi>C</m:mi>
	      <m:mi>gate</m:mi>
	    </m:msub>
	  </m:ci>

	  <m:apply>
	    <m:times/>
	    <m:ci>
	      <m:msub>
		<m:mi>c</m:mi>
		<m:mi>ox</m:mi>
	      </m:msub>
	    </m:ci>
	    <m:ci>
	      <m:msub>
		<m:mi>A</m:mi>
		<m:mi>gate</m:mi>
	      </m:msub>
	    </m:ci>
	  </m:apply>
	</m:apply>
      </m:math>, where
      <m:math>
	<m:apply>
	  <m:eq/>
	  <m:ci>
	    <m:msub>
	      <m:mi>A</m:mi>
	      <m:mi>gate</m:mi>
	    </m:msub>
	  </m:ci>

	  <m:apply>
	    <m:times/>
	    <m:ci>W</m:ci>
	    <m:ci>L</m:ci>
	  </m:apply>
	</m:apply>
      </m:math>, the area of the gate, but in most low frequency
      linear applications, this capacitance is not significant.) Thus
      our small signal model for the MOSFET, if it is operating in it
      saturation mode, is as seen in <cnxn target="fig33"/>.
    </para>


    <figure id="fig33"><media type="image/png" src="4.33b.png"/>
	<caption>Small signal MOSFET model</caption>
</figure>


    <para id="para3">
      This seems to be a pretty good amplifier. It has infinite input
      impedance (and hence will not load down the previous stage of
      the amplifier) and it has a nice (but non-linear) voltage
      controlled current source for its output. <cnxn document="m1024" target="fig21">A figure</cnxn> in the section
      on MOS regimes shows that as
      <m:math><m:ci><m:msub><m:mi>V</m:mi><m:mi>ds</m:mi>
      </m:msub></m:ci></m:math> is increased, the channel length
      <emphasis>does</emphasis>, in fact, get a bit shorter. The
      increased <m:math><m:ci><m:msub><m:mi>V</m:mi><m:mi>ds</m:mi>
      </m:msub></m:ci></m:math> makes the <term>pinch off</term>
      region expand a bit, which, of course, robs from the channel
      region. A shorter channel means slightly less channel
      resistance, and so
      <m:math><m:ci><m:msub><m:mi>I</m:mi><m:mi>d</m:mi>
      </m:msub></m:ci></m:math> <emphasis>actually</emphasis>
      increases a bit with increasing
      <m:math><m:ci><m:msub><m:mi>V</m:mi><m:mi>ds</m:mi>
      </m:msub></m:ci></m:math> instead of staying constant. We saw
      from the bipolar transistor, that when this occurs, we must add
      a resistor in parallel with our current source. Thus, let's
      complete the model with an additional
      <m:math><m:ci><m:msub><m:mi>r</m:mi><m:mi>o</m:mi>
      </m:msub></m:ci></m:math> but in fact, we will put it in with a
      dashed line, because except for very short channel devices, it
      has very little effect on device performance (<cnxn target="fig34"/>).
    </para>


    <figure id="fig34"><media type="image/png" src="4.34b.png"/>
	<caption>Adding an
      <m:math><m:ci><m:msub><m:mi>r</m:mi><m:mi>o</m:mi>
				</m:msub></m:ci></m:math>
	</caption>
</figure>


    <para id="para4">
      The MOSFET has several advantages over the bipolar
      transistor. One of the main ones, as we shall see, is that it is much
      easier to make. You only need two n-regions in a single p-type
      substrate. It is basically a surface device. This means you do not
      have to pile up different layers of n and p type material as you do
      with the bipolar transistor. Finally, we shall see that a variation on
      the MOSFET technology offers a <emphasis>huge</emphasis> advantage
      over bipolar devices when it comes to building logic circuits with a
      large number of gates (VLSI and ULSI circuits).
    </para>


    <para id="para5">
      To see why this is so, we have to digress for just a little bit,
      and discuss <cnxn document="m1027">logic circuits.</cnxn>
    </para>


  </content> 
</document>
