<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE document PUBLIC "-//CNX//DTD CNXML 0.5 plus MathML//EN" "http://cnx.rice.edu/cnxml/0.5/DTD/cnxml_mathml.dtd">
<document xmlns="http://cnx.rice.edu/cnxml" xmlns:md="http://cnx.rice.edu/mdml/0.4" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:bib="http://bibtexml.sf.net/" id="new60">
  <name xmlns:md="http://cnx.rice.edu/mdml/0.4" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:bib="http://bibtexml.sf.net/">Electrostatic Discharge and Latch-Up</name>
  <metadata xmlns:md="http://cnx.rice.edu/mdml/0.4" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:bib="http://bibtexml.sf.net/">
  <md:version xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:bib="http://bibtexml.sf.net/">2.15</md:version>
  <md:created xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:bib="http://bibtexml.sf.net/">2000/08/04</md:created>
  <md:revised xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:bib="http://bibtexml.sf.net/">2008/05/29 12:10:27.980 GMT-5</md:revised>
  <md:authorlist xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:bib="http://bibtexml.sf.net/">
      <md:author xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:bib="http://bibtexml.sf.net/" id="wlw">
      <md:firstname xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:bib="http://bibtexml.sf.net/">Bill</md:firstname>
      
      <md:surname xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:bib="http://bibtexml.sf.net/">Wilson</md:surname>
      <md:email xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:bib="http://bibtexml.sf.net/">wlw@madriver.net</md:email>
    </md:author>
  </md:authorlist>

  <md:maintainerlist xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:bib="http://bibtexml.sf.net/">
    <md:maintainer xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:bib="http://bibtexml.sf.net/" id="wlw">
      <md:firstname xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:bib="http://bibtexml.sf.net/">Bill</md:firstname>
      
      <md:surname xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:bib="http://bibtexml.sf.net/">Wilson</md:surname>
      <md:email xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:bib="http://bibtexml.sf.net/">wlw@madriver.net</md:email>
    </md:maintainer>
    <md:maintainer xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:bib="http://bibtexml.sf.net/" id="lizzardg">
      <md:firstname xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:bib="http://bibtexml.sf.net/">Elizabeth</md:firstname>
      
      <md:surname xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:bib="http://bibtexml.sf.net/">Gregory</md:surname>
      <md:email xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:bib="http://bibtexml.sf.net/">elizabeth.gregory@gmail.com</md:email>
    </md:maintainer>
    <md:maintainer xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:bib="http://bibtexml.sf.net/" id="jsilv">
      <md:firstname xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:bib="http://bibtexml.sf.net/">Jeffrey</md:firstname>
      <md:othername xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:bib="http://bibtexml.sf.net/">M</md:othername>
      <md:surname xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:bib="http://bibtexml.sf.net/">Silverman</md:surname>
      <md:email xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:bib="http://bibtexml.sf.net/">JSilverman@astro.berkeley.edu</md:email>
    </md:maintainer>
    <md:maintainer xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:bib="http://bibtexml.sf.net/" id="gerardw">
      <md:firstname xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:bib="http://bibtexml.sf.net/">Gerard</md:firstname>
      
      <md:surname xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:bib="http://bibtexml.sf.net/">Wysocki</md:surname>
      <md:email xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:bib="http://bibtexml.sf.net/">gerardw@rice.edu</md:email>
    </md:maintainer>
    <md:maintainer xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:bib="http://bibtexml.sf.net/" id="swkravitz">
      <md:firstname xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:bib="http://bibtexml.sf.net/">Scott</md:firstname>
      <md:othername xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:bib="http://bibtexml.sf.net/">W</md:othername>
      <md:surname xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:bib="http://bibtexml.sf.net/">Kravitz</md:surname>
      <md:email xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:bib="http://bibtexml.sf.net/">swkravitz@gmail.com</md:email>
    </md:maintainer>
  </md:maintainerlist>
  
  <md:keywordlist xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:bib="http://bibtexml.sf.net/">
    <md:keyword xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:bib="http://bibtexml.sf.net/">electrostatic discharge</md:keyword>
    <md:keyword xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:bib="http://bibtexml.sf.net/">shock</md:keyword>
    <md:keyword xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:bib="http://bibtexml.sf.net/">static electricity</md:keyword>
  </md:keywordlist>

  <md:abstract xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:bib="http://bibtexml.sf.net/">Sparks.</md:abstract>
</metadata>

  <content xmlns:md="http://cnx.rice.edu/mdml/0.4" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:bib="http://bibtexml.sf.net/">
    <para xmlns:md="http://cnx.rice.edu/mdml/0.4" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:bib="http://bibtexml.sf.net/" id="pa1">
      As you are probably aware, you have to be very careful when
      handling MOS circuits, to be sure that you are properly
      grounded, and that you do not transfer any static electricity to
      the chip. The <term xmlns:md="http://cnx.rice.edu/mdml/0.4" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:bib="http://bibtexml.sf.net/">standard human-body model</term> assumes a
      static charge transfer of about 0.1 micro-Coulombs (
      <m:math>
	<m:apply>
	  <m:times/>
	  <m:apply>
	    <m:power/>
	    <m:cn>10</m:cn>
	    <m:cn>-7</m:cn>
	  </m:apply>
	  <m:ci>C</m:ci>
	</m:apply>
      </m:math>) upon static
      electricity discharge between a human and a chip. This does not seem
      like enough charge to do any harm until we remember the old formula:

      <equation xmlns:md="http://cnx.rice.edu/mdml/0.4" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:bib="http://bibtexml.sf.net/" id="eqeqn56">
	<m:math>
	  <m:apply>
	    <m:eq/>
	    <m:ci>Q</m:ci>
	    <m:apply>
	      <m:times/>
	      <m:ci>C</m:ci>
	      <m:ci>V</m:ci>
	    </m:apply>
	  </m:apply>
	</m:math>
      </equation> or

      <equation xmlns:md="http://cnx.rice.edu/mdml/0.4" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:bib="http://bibtexml.sf.net/" id="eqeqn56b">
	<m:math>
	  <m:apply>
	    <m:eq/>
	    <m:ci>V</m:ci>
	    <m:apply>
	      <m:divide/>
	      <m:ci>Q</m:ci>
	      <m:ci>C</m:ci>
	    </m:apply>
	  </m:apply>
	</m:math>
      </equation>

    </para>

    <para xmlns:md="http://cnx.rice.edu/mdml/0.4" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:bib="http://bibtexml.sf.net/" id="pa2">
      Last time I looked

      <m:math>
	<m:apply>
	  <m:power/>
	  <m:cn>10</m:cn>
	  <m:cn>-7</m:cn>
	</m:apply>
      </m:math> divided by
      <m:math>
	<m:apply>
	  <m:power/>
	  <m:cn>10</m:cn>
	  <m:cn>-14</m:cn>
	</m:apply>
      </m:math> is about
      <m:math>
	<m:apply>
	  <m:power/>
	  <m:cn>10</m:cn>
	  <m:cn>7</m:cn>
	</m:apply>
      </m:math> volts! Add to this the fact that the
      gate oxide thickness is only about
      <m:math>
	<m:apply>
	  <m:times/>
	  <m:apply>
	    <m:power/>
	    <m:cn>10</m:cn>
	    <m:cn>-6</m:cn>
	  </m:apply>
	  <m:ci>cm</m:ci>
	</m:apply>
      </m:math>, so that we have
      electric fields in the gate oxide which are on the order of
      <m:math>
	<m:apply>
	  <m:times/>
	  <m:apply>
	    <m:power/>
	    <m:cn>10</m:cn>
	    <m:cn>13</m:cn>
	  </m:apply>
	  <m:apply>
	    <m:divide/>
	    <m:ci>V</m:ci>
	    <m:ci>cm</m:ci>
	  </m:apply>
	</m:apply>
      </m:math>! No wonder the things break. This problem is called
      <term xmlns:md="http://cnx.rice.edu/mdml/0.4" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:bib="http://bibtexml.sf.net/">electrostatic discharge</term>, or ESD, and is one
      of the major concerns of IC manufacturers. Protecting against
      ESD is still very much a "black art" and is something
      that people are still studying quite a bit. JFET's are much more
      rugged structures, and have much higher gate capacitances, and
      are not nearly so prone to ESD failure.
    </para>


    <para xmlns:md="http://cnx.rice.edu/mdml/0.4" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:bib="http://bibtexml.sf.net/" id="pa3">
      Since we are on the subject of problems, lets take a look at one
      more "glitch" that plagues IC designers. We have to go back to
      the CMOS circuit. Remember, the moat/substrate junction is
      reverse biased, so we will have an electric field in the
      depletion region of that junction, pointing as shown in <cnxn xmlns:md="http://cnx.rice.edu/mdml/0.4" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:bib="http://bibtexml.sf.net/" target="fig57"/>. Suppose, somehow, we have one or more stray
      electrons in the p-type substrate. They will be swept across the
      substrate/moat junction by the electric field, and be attracted
      to the moat contact by
      <m:math><m:msub><m:mi>V</m:mi><m:mi>dd</m:mi>
      </m:msub></m:math>. Let's focus on what happens as the electron
      flows out the <m:math><m:msub><m:mi>V</m:mi><m:mi>DD</m:mi>
      </m:msub></m:math> contact (<cnxn xmlns:md="http://cnx.rice.edu/mdml/0.4" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:bib="http://bibtexml.sf.net/" target="fig58"/>). As the
      electron moves through the (resistive) n-type moat material, it
      develops a voltage drop between the n-type material under the
      source, and the <m:math><m:msub><m:mi>V</m:mi><m:mi>DD</m:mi>
      </m:msub></m:math> contact (Which is also at the source
      potential since they are connected together by the interconnect
      on the surface of the wafer.) Electron flow in one direction
      means current flow in the other and so this makes the region
      under the source slightly negative with respect to the source
      region itself. This, of course, forward biases the source/moat
      junction slightly, which causes a hole or two to be injected
      into the moat from the p-source (<cnxn xmlns:md="http://cnx.rice.edu/mdml/0.4" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:bib="http://bibtexml.sf.net/" target="fig59"/>). The
      holes will be attracted by the field across the moat-substrate
      depletion layer, and, once they get there, they will be swept
      into the p-substrate (<cnxn xmlns:md="http://cnx.rice.edu/mdml/0.4" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:bib="http://bibtexml.sf.net/" target="fig60"/>). Once the holes
      get into the p-substrate, they will be attracted to the ground
      connection so that they can leave the semiconductor. As these
      holes flow past the n-source, and through the resistive
      p-substrate, they build up a potential between the ground
      contact (<cnxn xmlns:md="http://cnx.rice.edu/mdml/0.4" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:bib="http://bibtexml.sf.net/" target="fig61"/>), and the material under the
      source with a polarity which tends to forward bias the
      source-substrate junction, and cause electrons to be injected
      into the substrate. The electrons, in turn, are attracted to the
      field across the substrate-moat junction (<cnxn xmlns:md="http://cnx.rice.edu/mdml/0.4" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:bib="http://bibtexml.sf.net/" target="fig62"/>). Some of the electrons may recombine in the
      p-region, but in today's high-quality substrates, there are very
      few active recombination centers, and so even though the
      electrons are minority carriers, they have quite a long minority
      carrier lifetime, and most of them make it to the substrate-moat
      junction.and are swept into the moat. Once inside the n-moat,
      the electrons are then attracted to the +
      <m:math><m:msub><m:mi>V</m:mi><m:mi>dd</m:mi></m:msub></m:math>
      contact, where, of course, they build up a bigger forward bias
      across the source-moat junction, causing more holes to be
      emitted from the source into the moat (<cnxn xmlns:md="http://cnx.rice.edu/mdml/0.4" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:bib="http://bibtexml.sf.net/" target="fig63"/>). These holes are swept across the
      moat-substrate junction, flow to the ground contact and, well
      ... you get the idea! It does not take long before we have a
      dead short circuit between Vdd and ground. This is not healthy
      for integrated circuit chips in the least, and is a process
      called <term xmlns:md="http://cnx.rice.edu/mdml/0.4" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:bib="http://bibtexml.sf.net/">latch up</term> (<cnxn xmlns:md="http://cnx.rice.edu/mdml/0.4" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:bib="http://bibtexml.sf.net/" target="fig64"/>).
    </para>


    <figure xmlns:md="http://cnx.rice.edu/mdml/0.4" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:bib="http://bibtexml.sf.net/" id="fig57" orient="horizontal"><media xmlns:md="http://cnx.rice.edu/mdml/0.4" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:bib="http://bibtexml.sf.net/" type="image/png" src="4.57.png">
<param name="print-width" value="3in"/>
</media><caption xmlns:md="http://cnx.rice.edu/mdml/0.4" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:bib="http://bibtexml.sf.net/">The start of trouble!</caption></figure>


    <figure xmlns:md="http://cnx.rice.edu/mdml/0.4" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:bib="http://bibtexml.sf.net/" id="fig58" orient="horizontal"><media xmlns:md="http://cnx.rice.edu/mdml/0.4" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:bib="http://bibtexml.sf.net/" type="image/png" src="4.58.png">
<param name="print-width" value="2in"/>
</media><caption xmlns:md="http://cnx.rice.edu/mdml/0.4" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:bib="http://bibtexml.sf.net/">Electron flow builds up voltage</caption></figure>


    <figure xmlns:md="http://cnx.rice.edu/mdml/0.4" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:bib="http://bibtexml.sf.net/" id="fig59"><media xmlns:md="http://cnx.rice.edu/mdml/0.4" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:bib="http://bibtexml.sf.net/" type="image/png" src="4.59.png">
<param name="print-width" value="2in"/>
</media><caption xmlns:md="http://cnx.rice.edu/mdml/0.4" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:bib="http://bibtexml.sf.net/">The forward biased source injects some holes
      </caption></figure>


    <figure xmlns:md="http://cnx.rice.edu/mdml/0.4" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:bib="http://bibtexml.sf.net/" id="fig60" orient="horizontal"><media xmlns:md="http://cnx.rice.edu/mdml/0.4" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:bib="http://bibtexml.sf.net/" type="image/png" src="4.60.png">
<param name="print-width" value="3in"/>
</media><caption xmlns:md="http://cnx.rice.edu/mdml/0.4" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:bib="http://bibtexml.sf.net/">The holes are swept into the substrate</caption></figure>


    <figure xmlns:md="http://cnx.rice.edu/mdml/0.4" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:bib="http://bibtexml.sf.net/" id="fig61" orient="horizontal"><media xmlns:md="http://cnx.rice.edu/mdml/0.4" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:bib="http://bibtexml.sf.net/" type="image/png" src="4.61.png">
<param name="print-width" value="2in"/>
</media><caption xmlns:md="http://cnx.rice.edu/mdml/0.4" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:bib="http://bibtexml.sf.net/">Voltage drop at the n-channel source end.</caption></figure>


    <figure xmlns:md="http://cnx.rice.edu/mdml/0.4" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:bib="http://bibtexml.sf.net/" id="fig62" orient="horizontal"><media xmlns:md="http://cnx.rice.edu/mdml/0.4" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:bib="http://bibtexml.sf.net/" type="image/png" src="4.62.png">
<param name="print-width" value="3in"/>
</media><caption xmlns:md="http://cnx.rice.edu/mdml/0.4" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:bib="http://bibtexml.sf.net/">The electrons are swept into the moat</caption></figure>


    <figure xmlns:md="http://cnx.rice.edu/mdml/0.4" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:bib="http://bibtexml.sf.net/" id="fig63">
      <media xmlns:md="http://cnx.rice.edu/mdml/0.4" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:bib="http://bibtexml.sf.net/" type="image/png" src="4.63.png"/>
      <caption xmlns:md="http://cnx.rice.edu/mdml/0.4" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:bib="http://bibtexml.sf.net/">More current means a bigger voltage and more holes
	injected.</caption>
    </figure>

    <figure xmlns:md="http://cnx.rice.edu/mdml/0.4" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:bib="http://bibtexml.sf.net/" id="fig64" orient="horizontal">
      <media xmlns:md="http://cnx.rice.edu/mdml/0.4" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:bib="http://bibtexml.sf.net/" type="image/png" src="4.64.png"/>
      <caption xmlns:md="http://cnx.rice.edu/mdml/0.4" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:bib="http://bibtexml.sf.net/">Latch Up!</caption>
    </figure>


    <para xmlns:md="http://cnx.rice.edu/mdml/0.4" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:bib="http://bibtexml.sf.net/" id="pa4">
      There is an interesting circuit you can draw which shows what is
      happening from a somewhat different point of view. Note that we
      can consider the p-source, n-moat, and p-substrate as a pnp
      bipolar transistor. Also the n-source, p-substrate and n-moat
      also make a fine npn bipolar transistor. The two transistors are
      intermingled however, with the base of the pnp and the
      collectors of the npn sharing the same n-moat, and the collector
      of the pnp and the base of the npn sharing the p-substrate. The
      n-moat and p-substrates are both collectors
      <emphasis xmlns:md="http://cnx.rice.edu/mdml/0.4" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:bib="http://bibtexml.sf.net/">and</emphasis> bases at the same time. A little
      careful inspection of the cross section of the CMOS inverter
      will lead you to the following schematic shown in <cnxn xmlns:md="http://cnx.rice.edu/mdml/0.4" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:bib="http://bibtexml.sf.net/" target="fig65"/>. We need something to get this circuit started,
      so say we have a little collector current coming out of the top
      pnp transistor. This current flows down, through the resistor to
      ground. As it flows through the resistor it builds up a little
      voltage which forward biases the base-emitter junction of the
      lower, npn, transistor, and causes some collector current to
      flow into it. This current comes from
      <m:math><m:msub><m:mi>V</m:mi><m:mi>dd</m:mi></m:msub></m:math>
      through the upper resistor, and builds up a voltage across that
      resistor which will forward bias the base-emitter junction of
      the top, pnp, transistor. This, in turn, causes some additional
      collector current to flow out of the pnp transistor, and away we
      go! Latch-up is bad, and is something which IC designers work
      very hard to avoid.
    </para>


    <figure xmlns:md="http://cnx.rice.edu/mdml/0.4" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:bib="http://bibtexml.sf.net/" id="fig65" orient="horizontal">
      <media xmlns:md="http://cnx.rice.edu/mdml/0.4" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:bib="http://bibtexml.sf.net/" type="image/png" src="4.65.png"/>
      <caption xmlns:md="http://cnx.rice.edu/mdml/0.4" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:bib="http://bibtexml.sf.net/">Schematic of latch up circuit</caption>
    </figure>


    <para xmlns:md="http://cnx.rice.edu/mdml/0.4" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:bib="http://bibtexml.sf.net/" id="pa5">
      You might wonder what <emphasis xmlns:md="http://cnx.rice.edu/mdml/0.4" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:bib="http://bibtexml.sf.net/">actually</emphasis> starts a
      circuit going into latch-up. Refer back to the <cnxn xmlns:md="http://cnx.rice.edu/mdml/0.4" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:bib="http://bibtexml.sf.net/" document="m1029" target="fig47">CMOS inverter</cnxn>, and note
      that the n-drain on the NMOS is connected to the output. The
      output <emphasis xmlns:md="http://cnx.rice.edu/mdml/0.4" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:bib="http://bibtexml.sf.net/">could</emphasis> be a real output, going beyond
      the chip into the "real world". If the "customer" who is using
      the chip is careless, and somehow drags the output down below
      ground, the drain/p-substrate junction will be forward biased,
      electrons will be injected into the p-substrate, and we are back
      at <cnxn xmlns:md="http://cnx.rice.edu/mdml/0.4" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:bib="http://bibtexml.sf.net/" target="fig57"/>. IC designers try to keep the n-moat/
      <m:math><m:msub><m:mi>V</m:mi><m:mi>dd</m:mi></m:msub></m:math>
      contact as close to the PMOS source, and the p-substrate/ground
      contact as close to the NMOS source as they can to reduce the
      resistance between the contact and the source regions, and hence
      lower the chance of the circuit going into latch-up.
    </para>
  </content>
  
</document>
