Having learned something about how we
generate signals with bipolar and field effect transistors, we
now turn our attention to the problem of getting those signals
from one place to the next. Ever since Samuel Morse (and the
founder of my alma mater, Ezra Cornell)
demonstrated the first working telegraph, engineers and
scientists have been working on the problem of describing and
predicting how electrical signals behave as they travel down
specific structures called transmission lines.
Any electrical structure which carries a signal
from one point to another can be considered a transmission
line. Be it a long-haul coaxial cable used in the Internet, a
twisted pair in a building as part of a local-area network, a
cable connecting a PC to a printer, a bus layout on a
motherboard, or a metallization layer on a integrated circuit,
the fundamental behavior of all of these structures are
described by the same basic equations. As computer switching
speeds run into the 100s of MHz, into the GHz range,
considerations of transmission line behavior are ever more
critical, and become a more dominant force in the performance
limitations of any system.
For our initial purposes, we will introduce a
"generic" transmission line Figure 1, which will
incorporate most (but not all) features of real transmission
lines. We will then make some rather broad simplifications,
which, while rendering our results less applicable to real-life
situations, nevertheless greatly simplify
the solutions, and lead us to insights that we can indeed apply
to a broad range of situations.
The generic line consists of two conductors. We will suppose a
potential difference
Vx
V
x
exists between the two conductors, and that a current
Ix
I
x
flows down one conductor, and returns via the other. For the
time being, we will let the transmission line be
"semi-infinite", which means we have access to the line at some
point
xx, but the line then extends
out in the
+x
x
direction to infinity. (Such lines are a bit difficult to handle
in the lab!)
In order to be able to describe how
Vx
V
x
and
Ix
I
x
behave on this line, we have to make some kind of
model of the electrical characteristics
of the line itself. We can not just make up any model we want however;
we have to base the model on physical realities.
Let's start out by just considering one of the conductors and
the physical effects of current flowing though that
conductor. We know from freshman physics that a current flowing
in a wire gives rise to a magnetic field,
HH (Figure 2). Multiply
HH by
μμ and you get
BB, the magnetic flux density, and
then integrate BB over a plane
parallel to the wires and you get
ΦΦ, the magnetic flux "linking"
the circuit. This is shown in Figure 3 for at least
part of the surface. The definition of
LL, the inductance of a circuit
element, is just
L≡ΦI
L
Φ
I
(1)
where
ΦΦ is the flux linking
the circuit element, and
II is the
current flowing through it. Our only problem in finding
ΦΦ is that the longer a section
of wire we take, the more
ΦΦ we
have for the same
II. Thus, we will
introduce the concept of a distributed parameter.
- Definition 1:
distributed parameter
A distributed
parameter is a parameter which is spread throughout a
structure and is not confined to a lumped element such as a
coil of wire.
For instance, we will hereby define LL as the
distributed inductance for the transmission
line. It has units of Henrys/meter. If we have a length of
transmission line
x
0
x
0
meters long, and if that line has a distributed
inductance of LL H/m, then the
inductance LL of that length
of line is just
L=L
x
0
L
L
x
0
.
Likewise, if we have two conductors separated by some distance,
and if there is a potential difference
VV between the conductors, then
there must be some charge
±Q
±
Q
on the two conductors which gives rise to that potential
difference. We can imagine a linear charge distribution on the
transmission line,
ρρ (C/m),
where we have
+ρ
ρ
Coulombs/m on one conductor, and
-ρ
ρ
Coulombs/m on the other conductor. For a line of length
x
0
x
0
, we would have
Q=±ρ
x
0
Q
±
ρ
x
0
on each section of wire. Whenever you have two charged
conductors with a voltage difference between them, you can
describe the ratio of the charge to the voltage as a
capacitance. The two conductors would have a capacitance
C=QV=ρ
x
0
V
C
Q
V
ρ
x
0
V
(2)
and a distributed capacitance
C
C
(F/m) which is just
ρV
ρ
V
. A length of line
x
0
x
0
long would have a capacitance
C=C
x
0
C
C
x
0
Farads associated with it
Figure 4.
Thus, we see that the transmission line has both a distributed
inductance
L
L and a distributed capacitance
C
C
which are tied up with each other. There is really no way in
which we can separate one from the other. In other words, we can
not have only the capacitance, or only the inductance, there
will always be some of each associated with each section of line
now matter how small or how big we make it.
We are now ready to build our model. What we want
to do is to come up with some arrangement of inductors and
capacitors which will represent electrically, the properties of
the distributed capacitance and inductance we discussed
above. As a length of line gets longer, its capacitance
increases, so we had better put the distributed capacitances in
parallel with one another, since that is the way capacitors add
up. Also, as the line gets longer, its total inductance
increases, so we had better put the distributed inductances in
series with one another, for that is the way inductances add
up. Figure 5 is a representation of the distributed
inductance and capacitance of the generic transmission line.
We break the line up into sections
Δx
Δ
x
long, each one with an inductance
LΔx
L
Δ
x
and a capacitance
CΔx
C
Δ
x
. If we halve
Δx
Δ
x
, we would halve the inductance and capacitance of each
section, but we'd have twice as many of them per unit
length. Duh! The point is no matter how fine we make
CΔx
C
Δ
x
, we still have Ls and Cs arranged like we see in
Figure 5, with the two kinds of components intermixed.
We could make a more
realistic model and realize that all real wires have series
resistance associated with them and that whatever we use to keep
the two conductors separated will have some leakage conductance
associated it. To account for this we would introduce a series
resistance
R
R (ohms/unit length) and a series conductance
G
G (ohms/unit length). One section of our line model then
looks like Figure 6.
Although this
is a more realistic model, it
leads to much more complicated math. We will start out anyway,
ignoring the series resistance
R
R and the shunt conductance
G G. This
"approximation" turns out to be pretty good as long as either
the line is not too long, or the frequencies of the signals we
are sending down the line do not get too high. Without the
series resistance or parallel conductance we have what is called
an ideal
lossless transmission line.
"This book is available print on demand by going to the course page and selecting "Order a printed copy"."