<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE document PUBLIC "-//CNX//DTD CNXML 0.5 plus MathML//EN" "http://cnx.rice.edu/cnxml/0.5/DTD/cnxml_mathml.dtd">
<document xmlns="http://cnx.rice.edu/cnxml" xmlns:md="http://cnx.rice.edu/mdml/0.4" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:bib="http://bibtexml.sf.net/" id="new28">
  <name>Review of Phasors</name>
  <metadata>
  <md:version>2.11</md:version>
  <md:created>2000/08/11</md:created>
  <md:revised>2007/08/21 15:03:18.904 GMT-5</md:revised>
  <md:authorlist>
      <md:author id="wlw">
      <md:firstname>Bill</md:firstname>
      
      <md:surname>Wilson</md:surname>
      <md:email>wlw@madriver.net</md:email>
    </md:author>
  </md:authorlist>

  <md:maintainerlist>
    <md:maintainer id="wlw">
      <md:firstname>Bill</md:firstname>
      
      <md:surname>Wilson</md:surname>
      <md:email>wlw@madriver.net</md:email>
    </md:maintainer>
    <md:maintainer id="lizzardg">
      <md:firstname>Elizabeth</md:firstname>
      
      <md:surname>Gregory</md:surname>
      <md:email>elizabeth.gregory@gmail.com</md:email>
    </md:maintainer>
    <md:maintainer id="jsilv">
      <md:firstname>Jeffrey</md:firstname>
      <md:othername>M</md:othername>
      <md:surname>Silverman</md:surname>
      <md:email>JSilverman@astro.berkeley.edu</md:email>
    </md:maintainer>
    <md:maintainer id="gerardw">
      <md:firstname>Gerard</md:firstname>
      
      <md:surname>Wysocki</md:surname>
      <md:email>gerardw@rice.edu</md:email>
    </md:maintainer>
  </md:maintainerlist>
  
  <md:keywordlist>
    <md:keyword>phasor</md:keyword>
  </md:keywordlist>

  <md:abstract/>
</metadata>

  <content>
    <para id="para1">We will not always be dealing with transmission
      lines excited with a pulse. Although this is a good model for
      digital circuitry, it will not always apply. When we go to analog
      signals (rf, high frequency analog, etc.) we will need more tools
      than are available to us at this point. In the
      not-too-distant-past, the material we will next consider was
      starting to be considered passé. The rf spectrum was more or
      less filled up, and the watchword was "digital". Now, in the new
      age of wireless communication, cell phones, and rf Local Area
      Networks, demand for engineers who understand ac behavior on
      transmission lines and who can design systems which work well
      with rf signals are very much in demand. Pay heed to what we say
      here, and you might well find yourself with many lucrative job
      offers in the future.
    </para>

    <para id="para2">To begin, we want to consider a transmission line
    which is being excited with an oscillating source <cnxn target="fig1"/>.
 
      <figure id="fig1">
	<name>Sinusoidal Excitation of a Loaded Transmission Line</name>
	<media type="image/png" src="7.01.png"/>
      </figure>
      
      The usual set-up includes a source, with a sinusoidal output, a
      source impedance
      <m:math>
	<m:msub>
	  <m:mi>Z</m:mi>
	  <m:mi>g</m:mi>
	</m:msub>
      </m:math> a transmission line with impedance
      <m:math>
	<m:msub>
	  <m:mi>Z</m:mi>
	  <m:mn>0</m:mn>
	</m:msub>
      </m:math>, <m:math><m:ci>L</m:ci></m:math> meters long, and a
      load of impedance
      <m:math>
	<m:msub>
	  <m:mi>Z</m:mi>
	  <m:mi>L</m:mi>
	</m:msub>
      </m:math> at the end.
    </para>

    <para id="para3">Let's look at the source first. We can describe
      the output waveform from the generator as
      <equation id="eqn1">
	<m:math>
	  <m:apply>
	    <m:eq/>
	    <m:apply>
	      <m:ci type="fn">V</m:ci>
	      <m:ci>t</m:ci>
	    </m:apply>
	    <m:apply>
	      <m:times/>
	      <m:msub>
		<m:mi>V</m:mi>
		<m:mi>g</m:mi>
	      </m:msub>
	      <m:apply>
		<m:cos/>
		<m:apply>
		  <m:plus/>
		  <m:apply>
		    <m:times/>
		    <m:ci>ω</m:ci>
		    <m:ci>t</m:ci>
		  </m:apply>
		  <m:ci>θ</m:ci>
		</m:apply>
	      </m:apply>
	    </m:apply>
	  </m:apply>
	</m:math>
      </equation> 
      Which when plotted lookes like <cnxn target="fig2"/>.
      
      <figure id="fig2">
	<name>Excitation Waveform</name>
	<media type="image/png" src="7.02.png"/>
      </figure>

      The oscillating waveform has a period
      <m:math><m:ci>T</m:ci></m:math> and its angular frequency
      <m:math><m:ci>ω</m:ci></m:math> is given as
      <equation id="eqn2">
	<m:math>
	  <m:apply>
	    <m:eq/>
	    <m:ci>ω</m:ci>
	    <m:apply>
	      <m:divide/>
	      <m:apply>
		<m:times/>
		<m:cn>2</m:cn>
		<m:pi/>
	      </m:apply>
	      <m:ci>T</m:ci>
	    </m:apply>
	    <m:apply>
	      <m:times/>
	      <m:cn>2</m:cn>
	      <m:pi/>
	      <m:ci>f</m:ci>
	    </m:apply>
	  </m:apply>
	</m:math>
      </equation>
      The angle, <m:math><m:ci>θ</m:ci></m:math>, which
      specifies how much the wave is leading a cosine function with
      zero off-set is given by
      <equation id="eqn3"><m:math>
		<m:apply>
			<m:eq/>
			<m:ci>θ</m:ci>
			<m:apply>
				<m:times/>
				<m:cn>2</m:cn>
				<m:pi/>
				<m:apply>
					<m:divide/>
					<m:ci>τ</m:ci>
					<m:ci>T</m:ci>
				</m:apply>
			</m:apply>
		</m:apply>
	</m:math>
</equation>
      What we <emphasis>do not</emphasis> want to do, is carry a bunch
      of sine and cosine functions around with us everywhere. Once we
      start multiplying and dividing, the trig turns into a big mess,
      and gets in the way of our understanding of what is going
      on. The way we deal with this, as every good 242 student knows,
      is to introduce <term>phasors</term>.
    </para>

    <para id="para4">Since we know from <term>Euler's Identity</term>
      <equation id="eqn4"><m:math>
		<m:apply>
			<m:eq/>
			<m:apply>
				<m:times/>
				<m:msub>
					<m:mi>V</m:mi>
					<m:mi>g</m:mi>
				</m:msub>
				<m:apply>
					<m:exp/>
					<m:apply>
						<m:times/>
						<m:imaginaryi/>
						<m:apply>
							<m:plus/>
							<m:apply>
								<m:times/>
								<m:ci>ω</m:ci>
								<m:ci>t</m:ci>
							</m:apply>
							<m:ci>θ</m:ci>
						</m:apply>
					</m:apply>
				</m:apply>
			</m:apply>
			<m:apply>
				<m:times/>
				<m:msub>
					<m:mi>V</m:mi>
					<m:mi>g</m:mi>
				</m:msub>
				<m:apply>
					<m:plus/>
					<m:apply>
						<m:cos/>
						<m:apply>
							<m:plus/>
							<m:apply>
								<m:times/>
								<m:ci>ω</m:ci>
								<m:ci>t</m:ci>
							</m:apply>
							<m:ci>θ</m:ci>
						</m:apply>
					</m:apply>
					<m:apply>
						<m:times/>
						<m:imaginaryi/>
						<m:apply>
							<m:sin/>
							<m:apply>
								<m:plus/>
								<m:apply>
									<m:times/>
									<m:ci>ω</m:ci>
									<m:ci>t</m:ci>
								</m:apply>
								<m:ci>θ</m:ci>
							</m:apply>
						</m:apply>
					</m:apply>
				</m:apply>
			</m:apply>
		</m:apply>
	</m:math>
</equation>
      If we take a real part of
      <m:math>
	<m:apply>
	  <m:times/>
	  <m:msub>
	    <m:mi>V</m:mi>
	    <m:mi>g</m:mi>
	  </m:msub>
	  <m:apply>
	    <m:exp/>
	    <m:apply>
	      <m:times/>
	      <m:imaginaryi/>
	      <m:apply>
		<m:plus/>
		<m:apply>
		  <m:times/>
		  <m:ci>ω</m:ci>
		  <m:ci>t</m:ci>
		</m:apply>
		<m:ci>θ</m:ci>
	      </m:apply>
	    </m:apply>
	  </m:apply>
	</m:apply>
      </m:math> we will extract the voltage waveform we desire. We
      will re-write this function as
      <equation id="eqn5">
	<m:math>
	  <m:apply>
	    <m:eq/>
	    <m:apply>
	      <m:times/>
	      <m:msub>
		<m:mi>V</m:mi>
		<m:mi>g</m:mi>
	      </m:msub>
	      <m:apply>
		<m:exp/>
		<m:apply>
		  <m:times/>
		  <m:imaginaryi/>
		  <m:apply>
		    <m:plus/>
		    <m:apply>
		      <m:times/>
		      <m:ci>ω</m:ci>
		      <m:ci>t</m:ci>
		    </m:apply>
		    <m:ci>θ</m:ci>
		  </m:apply>
		</m:apply>
	      </m:apply>
	    </m:apply>
	    
	    <m:apply>
	      <m:times/>
	      <m:msub>
		<m:mi>V</m:mi>
		<m:mi>g</m:mi>
	      </m:msub>
	      <m:apply>
		<m:exp/>
		<m:apply>
		  <m:times/>
		  <m:imaginaryi/>
		  <m:ci>θ</m:ci>
		</m:apply>
	      </m:apply>
	      <m:apply>
		<m:exp/>
		<m:apply>
		  <m:times/>
		  <m:imaginaryi/>
		  <m:ci>ω</m:ci>
		  <m:ci>t</m:ci>
		</m:apply>
	      </m:apply>
	    </m:apply>
	  </m:apply>
	</m:math>
      </equation>
      and then <emphasis>define</emphasis>
      <m:math>
	<m:msub>
	  <m:mover>
	    <m:mi>V</m:mi>
	    <m:mi>∼</m:mi>
	  </m:mover>
	  <m:mi>g</m:mi>
	</m:msub>
      </m:math> as the <term>phasor voltage</term> where
      <equation id="eqn6">
	<m:math>
	  <m:apply>
	    <m:eq/>
	    <m:msub>
	      <m:mover>
		<m:mi>V</m:mi>
		<m:mi>∼</m:mi>
	      </m:mover>
	      <m:mi>g</m:mi>
	    </m:msub>
	    <m:apply>
	      <m:times/>
	      <m:msub>
		<m:mi>V</m:mi>
		<m:mi>g</m:mi>
	      </m:msub>
	      <m:apply>
		<m:exp/>
		<m:apply>
		  <m:times/>
		  <m:imaginaryi/>
		  <m:ci>θ</m:ci>
		</m:apply>
	      </m:apply>
	    </m:apply>
	  </m:apply>
	</m:math>
      </equation>
      Note that
      <m:math>
	<m:msub>
	  <m:mover>
	    <m:mi>V</m:mi>
	    <m:mi>∼</m:mi>
	  </m:mover>
	  <m:mi>g</m:mi>
	</m:msub>
      </m:math> is a complex quantity, with both a magnitude
      <m:math>
	<m:apply>
	  <m:abs/>
	  <m:msub>
	    <m:mi>V</m:mi>
	    <m:mi>g</m:mi>
	  </m:msub>
	</m:apply>
      </m:math> and a phase angle
      <m:math><m:ci>θ</m:ci></m:math>. In order to retrieve a real
      voltage signal from a phasor, we have to multiply the phasor by
      <m:math>
	<m:apply>
	  <m:exp/>
	  <m:apply>
	    <m:times/>
	    <m:imaginaryi/>
	    <m:ci>ω</m:ci>
	    <m:ci>t</m:ci>
	  </m:apply>
	</m:apply>
      </m:math> and then take the real part. Note that this is the
      same thing as plotting the phasor on the complex plane, and then
      observing the projection of the phasor on the real axis, as the
      phasor rotates around at a rate
      <m:math>
	<m:apply>
	  <m:times/>
	  <m:ci>ω</m:ci>
	  <m:ci>t</m:ci>
	</m:apply>
      </m:math> <cnxn target="fig3"/>.

      <figure id="fig3">
	<name>Phasor Representation</name>
	<media type="image/png" src="7.03.png"/>
      </figure>

      This method of visualization will sometimes help make results
      seem a little easier to understand, or at least check for
      reasonableness.

    </para>   
  </content>
  
</document>
