<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE document PUBLIC "-//CNX//DTD CNXML 0.5//EN" "http://cnx.rice.edu/cnxml/0.5/DTD/cnxml_plain.dtd">
<document xmlns="http://cnx.rice.edu/cnxml" xmlns:md="http://cnx.rice.edu/mdml/0.4" xmlns:bib="http://bibtexml.sf.net/" id="m10956">
  <name>Time Signature</name>
  <metadata>
  <md:version>2.9</md:version>
  <md:created>2002/12/03</md:created>
  <md:revised>2007/10/03 12:01:27.827 GMT-5</md:revised>
  <md:authorlist>
      <md:author id="Catherine">
      <md:firstname>Catherine</md:firstname>
      <md:othername>A.</md:othername>
      <md:surname>Schmidt-Jones</md:surname>
      <md:email>casjones@soltec.net</md:email>
    </md:author>
  </md:authorlist>

  <md:maintainerlist>
    <md:maintainer id="Catherine">
      <md:firstname>Catherine</md:firstname>
      <md:othername>A.</md:othername>
      <md:surname>Schmidt-Jones</md:surname>
      <md:email>casjones@soltec.net</md:email>
    </md:maintainer>
  </md:maintainerlist>
  
  <md:keywordlist>
    <md:keyword>meter</md:keyword>
    <md:keyword>music</md:keyword>
    <md:keyword>notation</md:keyword>
    <md:keyword>rhythm</md:keyword>
    <md:keyword>staff</md:keyword>
  </md:keywordlist>

  <md:abstract>The time signature on a musical staff tells you the meter of the music by defining both the number of beats in a measure and the type of note that fills one beat.</md:abstract>
</metadata>



  <content>
    <para id="delete_me">
The <term>time signature</term> appears at the beginning of a piece of music, right after the <cnxn document="m10881" strength="8">key signature</cnxn>. Unlike the key signature, which is on every <cnxn document="m10880" strength="8">staff</cnxn>, the time signature will not appear again in the music unless the meter changes. The <cnxn document="m12405" strength="9">meter</cnxn> of a piece of music is its basic rhythm; the time signature is the symbol that tells you the meter of the piece and how (with what <cnxn document="m10945" strength="9">type of note</cnxn>) it is written.
    </para>  

	<figure id="fig14a"><media type="application/postscript" src="timesig2-0.eps">
		<media type="image/png" src="timesig2.png"/>
	</media>
<caption>The time signature appears at the beginning of the piece of music, right after the clef symbol and key signature.</caption></figure>

   <section id="s1">
   <name>Beats and Measures</name>

    <para id="p1a">
Because music is heard over a period of time, one of the main ways music is organized is by dividing that time up into short periods called <term>beats</term>. In most music, things tend to happen right at the beginning of each beat. This makes the beat easy to hear and feel. When you clap your hands, tap your toes, or dance, you are "moving to the beat". Your claps are sounding at the beginning of the beat, too. This is also called being "on the downbeat", because it is the time when the <cnxn document="m12404" strength="5">conductor's baton</cnxn> hits the bottom of its path and starts moving up again. 
    </para>

    <example id="examp1a">
     <para id="pexamp1a">Listen to excerpts A, B, C and D. Can you clap your hands, tap your feet, or otherwise move "to the beat"? Can you feel the 1-2-1-2 or 1-2-3-1-2-3 of the meter? Is there a piece in which it is easier or harder to feel the beat?
     </para>
     <list id="lexamp1a"><item>
<link src="Tanz.mp3">A</link>
      </item>
      <item>
<link src="EasyWinners.MID">B</link>
      </item>
      <item>
<link src="Jetztkommt.MID">C</link>
      </item>
      <item>
<link src="Greensleeves.mp3">D</link>
      </item>
     </list>
    </example>

    <para id="p1b">
The downbeat is the strongest part of the beat, but some downbeats are stronger than others. Usually a pattern can be heard in the beats: strong-weak-weak-strong-weak-weak, or strong-weak-strong-weak. So beats are organized even further by grouping them into <term>bars</term>, or <term>measures</term>. (The two words mean the same thing.) For example, for music with a beat pattern of strong-weak-weak-strong-weak-weak, or 1-2-3-1-2-3, a measure would have three beats in it. The <term>time signature</term> tells you two things: how many beats there are in each measure, and what <cnxn document="m10945" strength="9">type of note</cnxn> gets a beat.
    </para>

	<figure id="fig14b"><name>Reading the Time Signature</name>
<media type="application/postscript" src="Timesig-0.eps">
		<media type="image/png" src="Timesig.png"/>
	</media>
<caption>This time signature means that there are three quarter notes (or any combination of notes that equals three quarter notes) in every measure. A piece with this time signature would be "in three four time" or just "in three four".</caption></figure>

    <exercise id="exer1a">
     <problem>
     <para id="prob1a">Listen again to the music in <cnxn target="examp1a"/>. Instead of clapping, count each beat. Decide whether the music has 2, 3, or 4 beats per measure. In other words, does it feel more natural to count 1-2-1-2, 1-2-3-1-2-3, or 1-2-3-4-1-2-3-4?

     </para>
     </problem>

     <solution>
      <list id="lsolu1a"><item>
A has a very strong, quick 1-2-3 beat.
        </item>
        <item>
B is in a slow (easy) 2. You may feel it in a fast 4.
        </item>
        <item>
C is in a stately 4.
        </item>
        <item>
D is in 3, but the beat may be harder to feel than in A because the rhythms are more complex and the performer is taking some liberties with the <cnxn document="m11648" strength="7">tempo</cnxn>.
        </item>
      </list>
     </solution>
    </exercise>

   </section> 
   <section id="s2">
   <name>Meter: Reading Time Signatures</name>

   <para id="p2a">
Most time signatures contain two numbers. The top number tells you how many beats there are in a measure. The bottom number tells you what kind of note gets a beat.
   </para>

	<figure id="fig14d"><media type="application/postscript" src="timesig3-0.eps">
		<media type="image/png" src="timesig3.png"/>
</media>
		<caption>In "four four" time, there are four beats in a measure and a quarter note gets a beat. Any combination of notes that equals four quarters can be used to fill up a measure.</caption>
	</figure>
 
   <para id="p2b">
You may have noticed that the time signature looks a little like a fraction in arithmetic. Filling up measures feels a little like finding equivalent <cnxn document="m11807" strength="8">fractions</cnxn>, too. In "four four time", for example, there are four beats in a measure and a quarter note gets one beat. So four quarter notes would fill up one measure. But so would any other combination of notes that equals four quarters: one whole, two halves, one half plus two quarters, and so on.
   </para>

   <example id="examp2a">
    <para id="pexamp2a">If the time signature is three eight, any combination of notes that adds up to three eighths will fill a measure. Remember that a <cnxn document="m11888" strength="9">dot</cnxn> is worth an extra half of the note it follows. <link src="timesig1.MID">Listen</link> to the rhythms in <cnxn target="fig14gg"/>.
    </para>

	<figure id="fig14gg"><media type="application/postscript" src="timesig4-0.eps">
		<media type="image/png" src="timesig4.png"/>
	</media>
<caption>If the time signature is three eight, a measure may be filled with any combination of notes and rests that adds up to three eight.</caption></figure>
  
   </example>
   
   <exercise id="exer2a">
    <problem>
     <para id="prob2a">
Write each of the time signatures below (with a clef symbol) at the beginning of a staff. Write at least four measures of music in each time signature. Fill each measure with a different combination of note lengths. Use at least one dotted note on each staff. If you need some staff paper, you can download this <link src="staffpaper1.pdf">PDF file</link>.
     </para>
     <list id="lexer2a" type="enumerated">
      <item>Two four time
      </item>
      <item>Three eight time
      </item>
      <item>Six four time
      </item>
     </list>

    </problem>
    <solution>
     <para id="solu2a">
There are an enormous number of possible note combinations for any time signature. That's one of the things that makes music interesting. Here are some possibilities. If you are not sure that yours are correct, check with your music instructor.
     </para>

	<figure id="fig14j"><media type="application/postscript" src="timesig5-0.eps">
		<media type="image/png" src="timesig5.png"/>
	</media>
<caption>These are only a few of the many, many possible note combinations that could be used in these time signatures.</caption></figure>
    </solution>
   </exercise>

   <para id="p2c">
A few time signatures don't have to be written as numbers. Four four time is used so much that it is often called <term>common time</term>, written as a bold "C". When both fours are "cut" in half to twos, you have <term>cut time</term>, written as a "C" cut by a vertical slash.
   </para>

	<figure id="fig14e"><media type="application/postscript" src="timesig6-0.eps">
		<media type="image/png" src="timesig6.png"/>
	</media></figure>

   </section>
   <section id="s3">
    <name>Counting and Conducting</name>

    <para id="p3a">
You may have already noticed that a measure in four four time looks the same as a measure in two two. After all, in arithmetic, four quarters adds up to the same thing as two halves. For that matter, why not call the time signature "one one" or "eight eight"?
    </para>

	<figure id="fig14h"><media type="application/postscript" src="timesig7-0.eps">
		<media type="image/png" src="timesig7.png"/>
</media>
		<caption>Measures in all of these meters look the same, but feel different. The difference is how many downbeats there are in a measure. </caption>
	</figure>

    <para id="p3b">Or why not write two two as two four, giving quarter notes the beat instead of half notes? The music would look very different, but it would sound the same, as long as you made the beats the same speed. The music in each of the staves in <cnxn target="fig14k"/> would sound like <link src="14k.mid">this</link>.
    </para>

	<figure id="fig14k"><media type="application/postscript" src="timesig8-0.eps">
		<media type="image/png" src="timesig8.png"/>
	</media>
<caption>The music in each of these staves should sound exactly alike.</caption></figure>

    <para id="p3c">
So why is one time signature chosen rather than another? The composer will normally choose a time signature that makes the music easy to read and also easy to count and conduct. Does the music feel like it has four beats in every measure, or does it go by so quickly that you only have time to tap your foot twice in a measure?
    </para>

    <para id="p3d">A common exception to this is six eight time, and the other time signatures (for example nine eight and twelve eight) commonly used to write compound <cnxn document="m12405">meters</cnxn>. A piece in six eight might have six beats in every measure, with an eighth note getting a beat. But it is more likely that the conductor will give only two beats per measure, with a dotted quarter (or three eighth notes) getting one beat. Since beats normally get divided into halves and quarters, this is the easiest way for composers to write beats that are divided into thirds. In the same way, three eight may only have one beat per measure; nine eight, three beats per measure; and twelve eight, four beats per measure.
    </para>

	<figure id="fig14c"><media type="application/postscript" src="timesig9-0.eps">
		<media type="image/png" src="timesig9.png"/>
</media>
		<caption>In six eight time, a dotted quarter usually gets one beat. This is the easiest way to write beats that are evenly divided into three rather than two.</caption>
	</figure>

   </section>
  </content>
  
</document>
