This simulation samples from the population of 50 numbers shown here. You can see that there are 10 instances of the values 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5. The mean of the population is therefore 3. The variance is the average squared deviation from the mean of 3. You can compute that this is exactly 2.

When you click on the button "Draw four numbers" four scores are sampled (with replacement) from the population. The four numbers are shown in red, as is the mean of the four numbers. The variance is then computed in two ways. The upper formula computes the variance by computing the mean of the squared deviations or the four sampled numbers from the sample mean. The lower formula computes the mean of the squared deviations or the four sampled numbers from the population mean of 3.00 (on rare occasions, the sample and population means will be equal). The computed variances are placed in the fields to the right of the formulas. The mean of the values in a field is shown at the bottom of the field. When there is onlyu on e value in the field, the mean will, of course, equal that value.

If you click the "Draw four numbers" button again, another four numbers will be sampled. The mean and variance will also be computed as before. The fields to the right of the formulas will hold both variances and the bottom of the field will show the mean of the variances.

The population variance is exactly 2. Use this fact to assess the relative value of the two formulas for variance. See which one, on average, approaches 2 and which one gives lower estimates. Explore whether either formula is always more accurate, or whether sometimes one is more accurate and at other times, the other formula is. If the variance based on the sample mean had been computed by dividing by N-1 = 3 instead of 4, then the variance would be 4/3 times bigger. Does multiplying the variance by 4/3 lead to better estimates?