Consider the following two-model evaluation problem
(van Trees; prob.2.2.1).
Prove that the likelihood ratio test reduces to
Find
Now assume that we need a Neyman-Pearson test. Find
The two models describe different equi-variance statistical
models for the observations (van
Trees; Prob. 2.2.11).
Find the likelihood ratio.
Compute the decision regions for various values of the threshold in the likelihood ratio test.
Assuming these two densities are equally likely, find the probability of making an error in distinguishing between them.
A hypothesis testing criterion radically different from
those discussed in this section and this section is minimum
equivocation. In this information theoretic
approach, the two-model testing problem is modeled as a
digital channel, shown in this figure. The channel's inputs,
generically represented by the
The quality of such information theoretic channels is
quantified by the mutual information
Non-Gaussian statistical models sometimes yield surprising
results in comparison to Gaussian ones. Consider the
following hypothesis testing problem where the observations
have a Laplacian probability distribution.
Find the sufficient statistic for the optimal decision rule.
What decision rule guarantees that the miss probability will be less than 0.1?
Developing a Neyman-Pearson decision rule for more than two
models has not been detailed. Assume
Formulate the optimization problem that simultaneously
maximizes
Show that your solution can be expressed as choosing the
largest of the sufficient statistics
Pattern recognition relies heavily on ideas derived from the
principles of statistical model testing. Measurements are
made of a test object and these are compared with those of
"standard" objects to determine which the test object most
closely resembles. Assume that the measurement vector
How is the minimum probability of error choice of object
determined from the observation of
Assuming that only two equally likely objects are possible
(
The expense of making measurements is always a practical consideration. Assuming each measurement costs the same to perform, how would you determine the effectiveness of a measurement vector's component?
Define
Based upon the observation of
One observation of the random variable
Suppose there are two terms in the aforementioned sum. Assuming that the two models are equally likely, find the minimum probability of error decision rule.
Compute the resulting probability of error of your decision rule.
Show that the decision rule found in this previous part applies no matter how many terms are assumed present in the sum.
The observed random variable
Draw the decision regions on the
Compute the probability of error.
Let
The goal is to choose which of the following four models is
true upong the reception of the three-dimensional vector
Assuming equally likely models, find the minimum
Calculate the resulting error probability.
Show that neither the decision rule nor the probability of
error do not depend on
To gain some appreciation of some of the issues in
implementing a detector, this problem asks you to program
(preferably in Matlab) a simple detector and numerically
compare its performance with theoretical predictions. Let
the observations consist of a signal contained in additive
Gaussian white noise.
What is the theoretical false-alarm probability of the
minimum
Write a Matlab program that estimates the false-alarm
probability. How many simulation trials are needed to
accurately estimate the false-alarm probability? Choose
values for
Calculate the Kullback-Leibler distance between the
following pairs of densities. Use these results to find the
Fisher information for the mean parameter
Jointly Gaussian random vectors having the same covariance matrix but dissimilar mean vectors.
Two Poisson random variables having average rates
Two sequences of statistically independent Laplacian random variables having the same variance but different means.
Plot the Kullback-Leibler distances for the Laplacian case
and for the Gaussian case of statistically independent
random variables. Set the variance equal to
The Kullback-Leibler and Chernoff distances can be related
to the Fisher information matrix. Let
Show that
What is the Chernoff distance between these distributions?
Deduce from the Kullback-Leibler distance for the Gaussian and Poisson cases what the Cramér-Rao bound is for estimating the mean and average rate, respectively.
Insights into certain detection problems can be gained by examining the Kullback-Leibler distance and the properties of Fisher information. We begin by first showing that the Gaussian distribution has the smallest Fisher information for the mean parameter for all differentiable distributions having the same variance.
Show that if
Use this property to show that the Fisher information is a convex function of the probability density.
Define
Because of the Fisher information's convexity, a given
distribution
What does this result suggest about the performance probabilities for problems wherein the models differ in mean?
Find the Chernoff distance between the following distributions.
Two Gaussian distributions having the same variance but different means.
Two Poisson distributions having differing parameter values.
Let's explore how well Stein's Lemma predicts optimal
detector performance probabilities. Consider the two-model
detection problem wherein
![]() |
Find an expression for the false-alarm probability
Find the Kullback-Leibler distance corresponding to the false-alarm probability's exponent.
Plot the exact error for values of
We observe a Gaussian random variable
What is an expression for the probability of error for
the minimum
Assume one can perform statistically independent
observations of
What is the sufficient statistic in this previous part and sketch how the
thresholds for this statistic vary with the number of
trials. Assume that
The optimum reception of binary information can be viewed as
a model testing problem. Here, equally-likely binary data
(a "zero" or a "one") is transmitted through a binary
symmetric channel. The indicated parameters denote the
probabilities of receiving a binary digit given that a
particular digit was sent. Assume that
Assuming a single transmission for each digit, what is the minimum probability of error receiver and what is the resulting probability of error?
One method of improving the probability of error is to
repeat the digit to be transmitted
Assume that we desire the probability of error to be
Construct a sequential algorithm which achieves the required probability of error. Assume that the transmitter will repeat each digit until informed by the receiver that it has determined what digit was sent. What is the expected length of the repetition code in this instance?
You have accepted the (dangerous) job of determining whether
the radioactivity levels at the Chernobyl reactor are
elevated or not. Because you want to stay as short a time
as possible to render you professional opinion, you decide
to use a sequential-like decision rule. Radioactivity is
governed by Poisson probability laws, which means that the
probability that
Construct a sequential decision rule to determine whether it is safe or not. Assume you have defined false-alarm and miss probabilities according to accepted "professional standards." According to these standards, these probabilities equal each other.
What is the expected time it will take to render a decision?
Sequential tests can be used to advantage in situations
where analytic difficulties obscure the problem. Consider
the case where the observations either contain no signal
(