<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE document PUBLIC "-//CNX//DTD CNXML 0.5 plus MathML//EN" "http://cnx.rice.edu/cnxml/0.5/DTD/cnxml_mathml.dtd">
<document xmlns="http://cnx.rice.edu/cnxml" xmlns:md="http://cnx.rice.edu/mdml/0.4" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:bib="http://bibtexml.sf.net/" id="new25">
  <name>Diffusion</name>
  <metadata>
  <md:version>**new**</md:version>
  <md:created>2003/06/17 13:45:49.185 GMT-5</md:created>
  <md:revised>2003/06/17 15:01:58.517 GMT-5</md:revised>
  <md:authorlist>
    <md:author id="wlw">
      <md:firstname>Bill</md:firstname>
      
      <md:surname>Wilson</md:surname>
      <md:email>wlw@rice.edu</md:email>
    </md:author>
  </md:authorlist>

  <md:maintainerlist>
    <md:maintainer id="wlw">
      <md:firstname>Bill</md:firstname>
      
      <md:surname>Wilson</md:surname>
      <md:email>wlw@rice.edu</md:email>
    </md:maintainer>
    <md:maintainer id="lizzardg">
      <md:firstname>Elizabeth</md:firstname>
      
      <md:surname>Gregory</md:surname>
      <md:email>lizzardg@rice.edu</md:email>
    </md:maintainer>
    <md:maintainer id="jsilv">
      <md:firstname>Jeffrey</md:firstname>
      
      <md:surname>Silverman</md:surname>
      <md:email>jsilv@rice.edu</md:email>
    </md:maintainer>
  </md:maintainerlist>
  
  <md:keywordlist>
    <md:keyword>diffusion</md:keyword>
    <md:keyword>p-n junction</md:keyword>
    <md:keyword>electrons</md:keyword>
    <md:keyword>electron transport</md:keyword>
    <md:keyword>holes</md:keyword>
    <md:keyword>Fick's First Law</md:keyword>
    <md:keyword>diffusion coefficient</md:keyword>
    <md:keyword>ambipolar</md:keyword>
    <md:keyword>minority carriers</md:keyword>
  </md:keywordlist>

  <md:abstract>The module discusses the process of electrons moving across a p-n or n-p junction known as diffusion.</md:abstract>
</metadata>

  <content>
    <section id="intro">
      <name>Introduction</name>
      <para id="attention">
	Let us turn our attention to what happens to the electrons and
	holesa, once they have been injected across a forward-biased
	junction. We will concentrate just on the electrons which are
	injected into the p-side of the junction, but keep in mind
	that similar things are also happening to the holes which
	enter the n-side.
      </para>
      <para id="injected">
	As we saw a while back, when electrons are injected across a
	junction, they move away from the junction region by a
	diffusion process, while at the same time, some of them are
	disappearing because they are minority carriers (electrons in
	basically p-type material) and so there are lots of holes
	around for them to recombine with. This is all shown
	schematically in <cnxn target="processes"/>.
	<figure id="processes">
	  <name>Diffusion across a P-N Junction</name>
	  <media type="image/png" src="f2_52.png"/>  
	  <caption>
	    Processes involved in electron transport across a p-n
	    junction
	  </caption>
	</figure>
      </para>
    </section>
    <section id="quantified">
	<name>Diffusion Process Quantified</name>
      <para id="easy">
	It is actually fairly easy to quantify this, and come up
	with an expression for the electron distribution within the
	p-region.  First we have to look a little bit at the
	diffusion process however. Imagine that we have a series of
	bins, each with a different number of electrons in them. In
	a given time, we could imagine that all of the electrons
	would flow out of their bins into the neighboring
	ones. Since there is no reason to expect the electrons to
	favor one side over the other, we will assume that exactly
	half leave by each side. This is all shown in <cnxn target="first"/>.  We will keep things simple and only look
	at three bins. Imagine I have 4, 6 , and 8 electrons
	respectively in each of the bins. After the required
	"emptying time," we will have a net flux of exactly one
	electron across each boundary as shown.
	<figure id="first">
	    <name>First example of a diffusion problem</name>
	  <media type="image/png" src="f2_53.png"/>
	</figure>
	<figure id="bins">
	  <name>Diffusion from bins</name>
	  <media type="image/png" src="f2_54.png"/>
	</figure>
	Now let's raise the number of electrons to 8, 12 and 16
	respectively (the electrons may over lap some now in the
	picture.) We find that the net flux across each boundary is
	now 2 electrons per emptying time, rather than one. This
	leads us to a rather obvious statement that the flux of
	carriers is proportional to the gradient of their
	density. This is stated formally in what is known as
	<term>Fick's First Law of Diffusion</term>:
	<equation id="ficksfirst">
	  <m:math>
	    <m:apply>
	      <m:eq/>
	      <m:ci>Flux</m:ci>
	      <m:apply>
		<m:times/>
		<m:apply>
		  <m:minus/>
		  <m:ci><m:msub>
		      <m:mi>D</m:mi>
		      <m:mi>e</m:mi>
		    </m:msub></m:ci>
		</m:apply>
		<m:apply>
		  <m:diff/>
		  <m:bvar>
		    <m:ci>x</m:ci>
		  </m:bvar>
		  <m:apply>
		    <m:ci type="fn">n</m:ci>
		    <m:ci>x</m:ci>
		  </m:apply>
		</m:apply>
	      </m:apply>
	    </m:apply>
	  </m:math>
	</equation>
	Where <m:math><m:ci><m:msub><m:mi>D</m:mi><m:mi>e</m:mi>
	    </m:msub></m:ci></m:math> is simply a proportionality
	constant called the <term>diffusion
	  coefficient</term>. Since we are talking about the motion of
	electrons, this diffusion flux must give rise to a current
	density
	<m:math><m:ci><m:msub><m:mi>J</m:mi><m:msub><m:mi>e</m:mi>
		<m:mi>diff</m:mi> </m:msub> </m:msub></m:ci> </m:math>.
	Since an electron has a charge 
	<m:math>
	  <m:apply>
	    <m:minus/>
	    <m:ci>q</m:ci>
	  </m:apply>
	</m:math> associated with it,
	<equation id="guiltbyassociation">
	  <m:math>
	    <m:apply>
	      <m:eq/>
	      <m:ci><m:msub>
		  <m:mi>J</m:mi>
		  <m:msub>
		    <m:mi>e</m:mi>
		    <m:mi>diff</m:mi>
		  </m:msub>
		</m:msub></m:ci>
	      <m:apply>
		<m:times/>
		<m:ci>q</m:ci>
		<m:ci><m:msub>
		    <m:mi>D</m:mi>
		    <m:mi>e</m:mi>
		  </m:msub></m:ci>
		<m:apply>
		  <m:diff/>
		  <m:bvar>
		    <m:ci>x</m:ci>
		  </m:bvar>
		  <m:ci type="fn">n</m:ci>
		</m:apply>
	      </m:apply>
	    </m:apply>
	  </m:math>
	</equation>
	Now we have to invoke something called the <term>continuity
	  equation</term>. Imagine we have a volume
	<m:math><m:ci>V</m:ci> </m:math> which is filled with some
	charge <m:math><m:ci>Q</m:ci> </m:math>.  It is fairly
	obvious that if we add up all of the current density which
	is flowing out of the volume that it must be equal to the
	time rate of decrease of the charge within that volume. This
	ideas is expressed in the formula below which uses a
	<emphasis>closed-surface integral</emphasis>, along with the
	all the other integrals to follow:
	<equation id="closed">
	  <m:math>
	    <m:apply>
	      <m:eq/>
	      <m:apply>
		<m:csymbol definitionURL="http://cnx.rice.edu/cd/cnxmath.ocd#surfaceintegral"/>
		<m:bvar>
		  <m:ci>S</m:ci>
		</m:bvar>
		<m:domainofapplication>
		  <m:ci>S</m:ci>
		</m:domainofapplication>
		<m:ci>J</m:ci>
	      </m:apply>
	      <m:apply>
		<m:minus/>
		<m:apply>
		  <m:diff/>
		  <m:bvar>
		    <m:ci>t</m:ci>
		  </m:bvar>
		  <m:ci>Q</m:ci>
		</m:apply>
	      </m:apply>
	    </m:apply>
	  </m:math>
	</equation>	  
	We can write <m:math><m:ci>Q</m:ci></m:math> as 
	<equation id="q">
	  <m:math>
	    <m:apply>
	      <m:eq/>
	      <m:ci>Q</m:ci>
	      <m:apply>
		<m:csymbol definitionURL="http://cnx.rice.edu/cd/cnxmath.ocd#surfaceintegral"/>
		<m:bvar>
		  <m:ci>V</m:ci>
		</m:bvar>
		<m:domainofapplication>
		  <m:ci>V</m:ci>
		</m:domainofapplication>
		<m:apply>
		  <m:ci type="fn">ρ</m:ci>
		  <m:ci>v</m:ci>
		</m:apply>
	      </m:apply>
	    </m:apply>
	  </m:math>
	</equation>  
	where we are doing a volume integral of the charge density
	<m:math><m:ci>ρ</m:ci></m:math> over the volume
	<m:math><m:ci>V</m:ci></m:math>.  Now we can use Gauss'
	theorem which says we can replace a surface integral of a
	quantity with a volume integral of its divergence:
	<equation id="usegauss">
	  <m:math>
	    <m:apply>
	      <m:eq/>
	      <m:apply>
		<m:csymbol definitionURL="http://cnx.rice.edu/cd/cnxmath.ocd#surfaceintegral"/>
		<m:bvar>
		  <m:ci>S</m:ci>
		</m:bvar>
		<m:domainofapplication>
		  <m:ci>S</m:ci>
		</m:domainofapplication>
		<m:ci>J</m:ci>
	      </m:apply>
	      <m:apply>
		<m:int/>
		<m:bvar>
		  <m:ci>V</m:ci>
		</m:bvar>
		<m:domainofapplication>
		  <m:ci>V</m:ci>
		</m:domainofapplication>
		<m:apply>
		  <m:divergence/>
		  <m:ci>J</m:ci>
		</m:apply>
	      </m:apply>
	    </m:apply>
	  </m:math>
	</equation>  	
	So, combining <cnxn target="closed"/>, <cnxn target="q"/>
	and <cnxn target="usegauss"/>, we have (note we are still
	dealing with surface and volume integrals):
	<equation id="combined">
	  <m:math>
	    <m:apply>
	      <m:eq/>
	      <m:apply>
		<m:int/>
		<m:bvar>
		  <m:ci>V</m:ci>
		</m:bvar>
		<m:domainofapplication>
		  <m:ci>V</m:ci>
		</m:domainofapplication>
		<m:apply>
		  <m:divergence/>
		  <m:ci>J</m:ci>
		</m:apply>
	      </m:apply>
	      <m:apply>
		<m:minus/>
		<m:apply>
		  <m:csymbol definitionURL="http://cnx.rice.edu/cd/cnxmath.ocd#surfaceintegral"/>
		  <m:bvar>
		    <m:ci>V</m:ci>
		  </m:bvar>
		  <m:domainofapplication>
		    <m:ci>V</m:ci>
		  </m:domainofapplication>
		  <m:apply>
		    <m:diff/>
		    <m:bvar>
		      <m:ci>t</m:ci>
		    </m:bvar>
		    <m:ci type="fn">ρ</m:ci>
		  </m:apply>
		</m:apply>
	      </m:apply>
	    </m:apply>
	  </m:math>
	</equation>
	
	Finally, we let the volume <m:math><m:ci>V</m:ci></m:math>
	and we have the differential form of the continuity equation
	<equation id="differential">
	  <m:math>
	    <m:apply>
	      <m:eq/>
	      <m:apply>
		<m:divergence/>
		<m:ci>J</m:ci>
	      </m:apply>
	      <m:apply>
		<m:minus/>
		<m:apply>
		  <m:diff/>
		  <m:bvar>
		    <m:ci>t</m:ci>
		  </m:bvar>
		  <m:ci type="fn">ρ</m:ci>
		</m:apply>
	      </m:apply>
	    </m:apply>
	  </m:math>
	</equation>
      </para>
    </section>
    <section id="electrons">
      <name>What about the Electrons?</name>
      <para id="whatindeed">  
	Now let's go back to the electrons in the diode. The
	electrons which have been injected across the junction are
	called <term>excess minority carriers</term>, because they
	are electrons in a p-region (hence minority) but their
	concentration is greater than what they would be if they
	were just in a regular sample of p-type material. We will
	designate them as
	<m:math><m:ci><m:msup><m:mi>n</m:mi><m:mo>'</m:mo>
	    </m:msup></m:ci></m:math>, and since they could change with
	both time and position we shall write them as
	<m:math>
	  <m:apply>
	    <m:ci type="fn"><m:msup>
		<m:mi>n</m:mi>
		<m:mo>'</m:mo>
	      </m:msup></m:ci>
	    <m:ci>x</m:ci>
	    <m:ci>t</m:ci>
	  </m:apply>
	</m:math>.  Now there are two ways in which 
	<m:math>
	  <m:apply>
	    <m:ci type="fn"><m:msup>
		<m:mi>n</m:mi>
		<m:mo>'</m:mo>
	      </m:msup></m:ci>
	    <m:ci>x</m:ci>
	    <m:ci>t</m:ci>
	  </m:apply>
	</m:math> can change with time. One would be if we were to
	stop injecting electrons in from the n-side of the
	junction. A reasonable way to account for the decay which
	would occur if we were not supplying electrons would be to
	write:
	<equation id="noelectrons">
	  <m:math>
	    <m:apply>
	      <m:eq/>
	      <m:apply>
		<m:diff/>
		<m:bvar>
		  <m:ci>t</m:ci>
		</m:bvar>
		<m:apply>
		  <m:ci type="fn"><m:msup>
		      <m:mi>n</m:mi>
		      <m:mo>'</m:mo>
		    </m:msup></m:ci>
		  <m:ci>x</m:ci>
		  <m:ci>t</m:ci>
		</m:apply>
	      </m:apply>
	      <m:apply>
		<m:minus/>
		<m:apply>
		  <m:divide/>
		  <m:apply>
		    <m:ci type="fn"><m:msup>
			<m:mi>n</m:mi>
			<m:mo>'</m:mo>
		      </m:msup></m:ci>
		    <m:ci>x</m:ci>
		    <m:ci>t</m:ci>
		  </m:apply>
		  <m:ci><m:msub>
		      <m:mi>τ</m:mi>
		      <m:mi>r</m:mi>
		    </m:msub></m:ci>
		</m:apply>
	      </m:apply>
	    </m:apply>
	  </m:math>
	</equation>  	
	Where <m:math><m:ci><m:msub><m:mi>τ</m:mi><m:mi>r</m:mi>
	    </m:msub></m:ci></m:math> called the <term>minority carrier
	  recombination lifetime</term>. It is pretty easy to show
	that if we start out with an excess minority carrier
	concentration
	<m:math><m:ci><m:msup><m:msub><m:mi>n</m:mi><m:mi>o</m:mi>
	      </m:msub><m:mo>'</m:mo> </m:msup></m:ci></m:math> at 
	<m:math>
	  <m:apply>
	    <m:eq/>
	    <m:ci>t</m:ci>
	    <m:cn>0</m:cn>
	  </m:apply>
	</m:math>, then 
	<m:math>
	  <m:apply>
	    <m:ci type="fn"><m:msup>
		<m:mi>n</m:mi>
		<m:mo>'</m:mo>
	      </m:msup></m:ci>
	    <m:ci>x</m:ci>
	    <m:ci>t</m:ci>
	  </m:apply>
	</m:math> will goes as
	<equation id="goingas">
	  <m:math>
	    <m:apply>
	      <m:eq/>
	      <m:apply>
		<m:ci type="fn"><m:msup>
		    <m:mi>n</m:mi>
		    <m:mo>'</m:mo>
		  </m:msup></m:ci>
		<m:ci>x</m:ci>
		<m:ci>t</m:ci>
	      </m:apply>
	      <m:apply>
		<m:exp/>
		<m:apply>
		  <m:divide/>
		  <m:cn>-1</m:cn>
		  <m:ci><m:msub>
		      <m:mi>τ</m:mi>
		      <m:mi>r</m:mi>
		    </m:msub></m:ci>
		</m:apply>
	      </m:apply>
	    </m:apply>
	  </m:math>
	</equation>  
	But, the electron concentration can also change because of
	electrons flowing into or out of the region
	<m:math><m:ci>x</m:ci></m:math>. The electron concentration 
	<m:math>
	  <m:apply>
	    <m:ci type="fn"><m:msup>
		<m:mi>n</m:mi>
		<m:mo>'</m:mo>
	      </m:msup></m:ci>
	    <m:ci>x</m:ci>
	    <m:ci>t</m:ci>
	  </m:apply>
	</m:math> is just 
	<m:math>
	  <m:apply>
	    <m:divide/>
	    <m:apply>
	      <m:ci type="fn">ρ</m:ci>
	      <m:ci>x</m:ci>
	      <m:ci>t</m:ci>
	    </m:apply>
	    <m:ci>q</m:ci>
	  </m:apply>
	</m:math>.  Thus, due to electron flow we have:
	<equation id="flow">
	  <m:math>
	    <m:apply>
	      <m:eq/>
	      <m:apply>
		<m:diff/>
		<m:bvar>
		  <m:ci>t</m:ci>
		</m:bvar>
		<m:apply>
		  <m:ci type="fn"><m:msup>
		      <m:mi>n</m:mi>
		      <m:mo>'</m:mo>
		    </m:msup></m:ci>
		  <m:ci>x</m:ci>
		  <m:ci>t</m:ci>
		</m:apply>
	      </m:apply>
	      <m:apply>
		<m:times/>
		<m:apply>
		  <m:divide/>
		  <m:cn>1</m:cn>
		  <m:ci>q</m:ci>
		</m:apply>
		<m:apply>
		  <m:diff/>
		  <m:bvar>
		    <m:ci>t</m:ci>
		  </m:bvar>
		  <m:apply>
		    <m:ci type="fn">ρ</m:ci>
		    <m:ci>x</m:ci>
		    <m:ci>t</m:ci>
		  </m:apply>
		</m:apply>
	      </m:apply>
	      <m:apply>
		<m:times/>
		<m:apply>
		  <m:divide/>
		  <m:cn>1</m:cn>
		  <m:ci>q</m:ci>
		</m:apply>
		<m:apply>
		  <m:divergence/>
		  <m:apply>
		    <m:ci type="fn">J</m:ci>
		    <m:ci>x</m:ci>
		    <m:ci>t</m:ci>
		  </m:apply>
		</m:apply>
	      </m:apply>
	    </m:apply>
	  </m:math>
	</equation>	
	But, we can get an expression for 
	<m:math>
	  <m:apply>
	    <m:ci type="fn">J</m:ci>
	    <m:ci>x</m:ci>
	    <m:ci>t</m:ci>
	  </m:apply>
	</m:math> from <cnxn target="guiltbyassociation"/>.
	Reducing the divergence in the <cnxn target="flow">above
	  equation</cnxn> to one dimension (we just have a 
	<m:math>
	  <m:apply>
	    <m:partialdiff/>
	    <m:bvar>
	      <m:ci>x</m:ci>
	    </m:bvar>
	    <m:ci type="fn">J</m:ci>
	  </m:apply>
	</m:math>) we finally end up with
	<equation id="finally">
	  <m:math>
	    <m:apply>
	      <m:eq/>
	      <m:apply>
		<m:diff/>
		<m:bvar>
		  <m:ci>t</m:ci>
		</m:bvar>
		<m:apply>
		  <m:ci type="fn"><m:msup>
		      <m:mi>n</m:mi>
		      <m:mo>'</m:mo>
		    </m:msup></m:ci>
		  <m:ci>x</m:ci>
		  <m:ci>t</m:ci>
		</m:apply>
	      </m:apply>
	      <m:apply>
		<m:times/>
		<m:ci><m:msub>
		    <m:mi>D</m:mi>
		    <m:mi>e</m:mi>
		  </m:msub></m:ci>
		<m:apply>
		  <m:diff/>
		  <m:bvar>
		    <m:ci>t</m:ci>
		    <m:degree>
		      <m:cn>2</m:cn>
		    </m:degree>
		  </m:bvar>
		  <m:apply>
		    <m:ci type="fn"><m:msup>
			<m:mi>n</m:mi>
			<m:mo>'</m:mo>
		      </m:msup></m:ci>
		    <m:ci>x</m:ci>
		    <m:ci>t</m:ci>
		  </m:apply>
		</m:apply>
	      </m:apply>
	    </m:apply>
	  </m:math>
	</equation>	  	
	Combining <cnxn target="finally"/> and <cnxn target="noelectrons"/> (electrons will, after all, suffer
	from both recombination and diffusion) and we end up with:
	<equation id="recomdiff">
	  <m:math>
	    <m:apply>
	      <m:eq/>
	      <m:apply>
		<m:diff/>
		<m:bvar>
		  <m:ci>t</m:ci>
		</m:bvar>
		<m:apply>
		  <m:ci type="fn"><m:msup>
		      <m:mi>n</m:mi>
		      <m:mo>'</m:mo>
		    </m:msup></m:ci>
		  <m:ci>x</m:ci>
		  <m:ci>t</m:ci>
		</m:apply>
	      </m:apply>
	      <m:apply>
		<m:minus/>
		<m:apply>
		  <m:times/>
		  <m:ci><m:msub>
		      <m:mi>D</m:mi>
		      <m:mi>e</m:mi>
		    </m:msub></m:ci>
		  <m:apply>
		    <m:diff/>
		    <m:bvar>
		      <m:ci>t</m:ci>
		      <m:degree>
			<m:cn>2</m:cn>
		      </m:degree>
		    </m:bvar>
		    <m:apply>
		      <m:ci type="fn"><m:msup>
			  <m:mi>n</m:mi>
			  <m:mo>'</m:mo>
			</m:msup></m:ci>
		      <m:ci>x</m:ci>
		      <m:ci>t</m:ci>
		    </m:apply>
		  </m:apply>
		</m:apply>
		<m:apply>
		  <m:divide/>
		  <m:apply>
		    <m:ci type="fn"><m:msup>
			<m:mi>n</m:mi>
			<m:mo>'</m:mo>
		      </m:msup></m:ci>
		    <m:ci>x</m:ci>
		    <m:ci>t</m:ci>
		  </m:apply>
		  <m:ci><m:msub>
		      <m:mi>τ</m:mi>
		      <m:mi>r</m:mi>
		    </m:msub></m:ci>
		</m:apply>
	      </m:apply>
	    </m:apply>
	  </m:math>
	</equation>	
	This is a somewhat specialized form of an equation called the
	<term>ambipolar diffusion equation</term>. It seems kind of
	complicated but we can get some nice results from it. Let's
	see what we can do with this.
      </para>
      <section id="ambipolar">
	<name>Using the Ambipolar Diffusion Equation</name>
	<para id="steadystate">	     
	  For anything we will be interested in, we will only look
	  at <term>steady state solutions</term>. This means that
	  the time derivative on the LHS of equation 12 is zero, and
	  so we have (letting
	  <m:math>
	    <m:apply>
	      <m:ci type="fn"><m:msup>
		  <m:mi>n</m:mi>
		  <m:mo>'</m:mo>
		</m:msup></m:ci>
	      <m:ci>x</m:ci>
	      <m:ci>t</m:ci>
	    </m:apply>
	  </m:math> become simply 
	  <m:math>
	    <m:apply>
	      <m:ci type="fn"><m:msup>
		  <m:mi>n</m:mi>
		  <m:mo>'</m:mo>
		</m:msup></m:ci>
	      <m:ci>x</m:ci>
	    </m:apply>
	  </m:math> since we no longer have any time variation to
	  worry about)
	  <equation id="steadystateq">
	    <m:math>
	      <m:apply>
		<m:eq/>
		<m:apply>
		  <m:minus/>
		  <m:apply>
		    <m:diff/>
		    <m:bvar>
		      <m:ci>t</m:ci>
		      <m:degree>
			<m:cn>2</m:cn>
		      </m:degree>
		    </m:bvar>
		    <m:apply>
		      <m:ci type="fn"><m:msup>
			  <m:mi>n</m:mi>
			  <m:mo>'</m:mo>
			</m:msup></m:ci>
		      <m:ci>x</m:ci>
		    </m:apply>
		  </m:apply>
		  <m:apply>
		    <m:times/>
		    <m:apply>
		      <m:divide/>
		      <m:cn>1</m:cn>
		      <m:apply>
			<m:times/>
			<m:ci><m:msub>
			    <m:mi>D</m:mi>
			    <m:mi>e</m:mi>
			  </m:msub></m:ci>
			<m:ci><m:msub>
			    <m:mi>τ</m:mi>
			    <m:mi>r</m:mi>
			  </m:msub></m:ci>
		      </m:apply>
		    </m:apply>
		    <m:apply>
		      <m:ci type="fn"><m:msup>
			  <m:mi>n</m:mi>
			  <m:mo>'</m:mo>
			</m:msup></m:ci>
		      <m:ci>x</m:ci>
		    </m:apply>
		  </m:apply>
		</m:apply>
		<m:cn>0</m:cn>
	      </m:apply>
	    </m:math>
	  </equation>	    	  
	  Let's pick the not unreasonable boundary conditions that 
	  <m:math>
	    <m:apply>
	      <m:eq/>
	      <m:apply>
		<m:ci type="fn"><m:msup>
		    <m:mi>n</m:mi>
		    <m:mo>'</m:mo>
		  </m:msup></m:ci>
		<m:cn>0</m:cn>
	      </m:apply>
	      <m:ci><m:msub>
		  <m:mi>n</m:mi>
		  <m:mn>0</m:mn>
		</m:msub></m:ci>
	    </m:apply>
	  </m:math> (the concentration of excess electrons just at
	  the start of the diffusion region) and 
	  <m:math>
	    <m:apply>
	      <m:tendsto/>
	      <m:apply>
		<m:ci type="fn"><m:msup>
		    <m:mi>n</m:mi>
		    <m:mo>'</m:mo>
		  </m:msup></m:ci>
		<m:ci>x</m:ci>
	      </m:apply>
	      <m:cn>0</m:cn>
	    </m:apply>
	  </m:math> as 
	  <m:math>
	    <m:apply>
	      <m:tendsto/>
	      <m:ci>x</m:ci>
	      <m:infinity/>
	    </m:apply>
	  </m:math> (the excess carriers go to zero when we get far
	  from the junction) then
	  <equation id="boundaries">
	    <m:math>
	      <m:apply>
		<m:eq/>
		<m:apply>
		  <m:ci type="fn">n</m:ci>
		  <m:ci>x</m:ci>
		</m:apply>
		<m:apply>
		  <m:times/>
		  <m:ci><m:msub>
		      <m:mi>n</m:mi>
		      <m:mn>0</m:mn>
		    </m:msub></m:ci>
		  <m:apply>
		    <m:exp/>
		    <m:apply>
		      <m:minus/>
		      <m:apply>
			<m:divide/>
			<m:ci>x</m:ci>
			<m:apply>
			  <m:root/>
			  <m:apply>
			    <m:times/>
			    <m:ci><m:msub>
				<m:mi>D</m:mi>
				<m:mi>e</m:mi>
			      </m:msub></m:ci>
			    <m:ci><m:msub>
				<m:mi>τ</m:mi>
				<m:mi>r</m:mi>
			      </m:msub></m:ci>
			  </m:apply>
			</m:apply>
		      </m:apply>
		    </m:apply>
		  </m:apply>
		</m:apply>
	      </m:apply>
	    </m:math>
	  </equation>   
	  The expression in the radical
	  <m:math>
	    <m:apply>
	      <m:root/>
	      <m:apply>
		<m:times/>
		<m:ci><m:msub>
		    <m:mi>D</m:mi>
		    <m:mi>e</m:mi>
		  </m:msub></m:ci>
		<m:ci><m:msub>
		    <m:mi>τ</m:mi>
		    <m:mi>r</m:mi>
		  </m:msub></m:ci>
	      </m:apply>
	    </m:apply>
	  </m:math> is called the <term>electron diffusion
	    length</term>,
	  <m:math><m:ci><m:msub><m:mi>L</m:mi><m:mi>e</m:mi>
	      </m:msub></m:ci></m:math>, and gives us some idea as to how
	  far away from the junction the excess electrons will exist
	  before they have more or less all recombined. This will be
	  important for us when we move on to bipolar transistors.
	</para>
	<para id="numbers">     
	  Just so you can get a feel for some numbers, a typical value
	  for the diffusion coefficient for electrons in silicon would be
	  <m:math>
	    <m:apply>
	      <m:eq/>
	      <m:ci><m:msub>
		  <m:mi>D</m:mi>
		  <m:mi>e</m:mi>
		</m:msub></m:ci>
	      <m:apply>
		<m:times/>
		<m:cn>25</m:cn>
		<m:apply>
		  <m:divide/>
		  <m:apply>
		    <m:power/>
		    <m:ci>cm</m:ci>
		    <m:cn>2</m:cn>
		  </m:apply>
		  <m:ci>sec</m:ci>
		</m:apply>
	      </m:apply>
	    </m:apply>
	  </m:math> and the minority carrier lifetime is usually around a 
	  microsecond. Thus 
	  <equation id="length">
	    <m:math>
	      <m:apply>
		<m:eq/>
		<m:ci><m:msub>
		    <m:mi>L</m:mi>
		    <m:mi>e</m:mi>
		  </m:msub></m:ci>
		<m:apply>
		  <m:root/>
		  <m:apply>
		    <m:times/>
		    <m:ci><m:msub>
			<m:mi>D</m:mi>
			<m:mi>e</m:mi>
		      </m:msub></m:ci>
		    <m:ci><m:msub>
			<m:mi>τ</m:mi>
			<m:mi>r</m:mi>
		      </m:msub></m:ci>
		  </m:apply>
		</m:apply>
		<m:apply>
		  <m:root/>
		  <m:apply>
		    <m:times/>
		    <m:cn>25</m:cn>
		    <m:apply>
		      <m:power/>
		      <m:cn>10</m:cn>
		      <m:cn>-6</m:cn>
		    </m:apply>
		  </m:apply>
		</m:apply>
		<m:apply>
		  <m:times/>
		  <m:cn>5</m:cn>
		  <m:apply>
		    <m:power/>
		    <m:cn>10</m:cn>
		    <m:cn>-3</m:cn>
		  </m:apply>
		  <m:ci>cm</m:ci>
		</m:apply>
	      </m:apply>
	    </m:math>
	  </equation>      
	  which is not very far at all!

	</para> 
      </section> 
    </section>
  </content>
</document>
