<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE document PUBLIC "-//CNX//DTD CNXML 0.5 plus MathML//EN" "http://cnx.rice.edu/cnxml/0.5/DTD/cnxml_mathml.dtd">
<document xmlns="http://cnx.rice.edu/cnxml" xmlns:md="http://cnx.rice.edu/mdml/0.4" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:bib="http://bibtexml.sf.net/" id="new43">
  <name>Transmission Line Examples</name>
  <metadata>
  <md:version>**new**</md:version>
  <md:created>2003/06/19 15:12:36.977 GMT-5</md:created>
  <md:revised>2003/06/20 11:21:00.616 GMT-5</md:revised>
  <md:authorlist>
    <md:author id="wlw">
      <md:firstname>Bill</md:firstname>
      
      <md:surname>Wilson</md:surname>
      <md:email>wlw@rice.edu</md:email>
    </md:author>
  </md:authorlist>

  <md:maintainerlist>
    <md:maintainer id="wlw">
      <md:firstname>Bill</md:firstname>
      
      <md:surname>Wilson</md:surname>
      <md:email>wlw@rice.edu</md:email>
    </md:maintainer>
    <md:maintainer id="lizzardg">
      <md:firstname>Elizabeth</md:firstname>
      
      <md:surname>Gregory</md:surname>
      <md:email>lizzardg@rice.edu</md:email>
    </md:maintainer>
    <md:maintainer id="jsilv">
      <md:firstname>Jeffrey</md:firstname>
      
      <md:surname>Silverman</md:surname>
      <md:email>jsilv@rice.edu</md:email>
    </md:maintainer>
  </md:maintainerlist>
  
  <md:keywordlist>
    <md:keyword>transmission line</md:keyword>
    <md:keyword>stripline</md:keyword>
    <md:keyword>relative dielectric constant</md:keyword>
  </md:keywordlist>

  <md:abstract>This document examines a stripline, one example of a transmission line.</md:abstract>
</metadata>

  <content>
    <para id="para1"> As an example, and also because it even has some
      practical importance, let's look at one kind of transmission
      line. It is called a <term>stripline</term> and it looks like
      <cnxn target="fig1"/>. It consists of a flat conductor, located
      between two ground planes. It is supported by an insulating
      dielectric with dielectric constant
      <m:math><m:ci>ε</m:ci></m:math>. This is kind of like
      the situation you would find on a multi-level PC board, where
      perhaps the bus lines would be running on an inner layer with
      ground planes above and below them.

      <figure id="fig1">
	<name>A Stripline</name>
	<media type="image/png" src="6.10.png"/>
      </figure>

      Between the center conductor and the ground plane, there will be
      some capacitance, <m:math><m:ci>C</m:ci></m:math>. If we can
      assume that the electric field is more or less confined to the
      regions between the strip conductor and the ground plane (which
      occurs when the ratio of
      <m:math>
	<m:apply>
	  <m:divide/>
	  <m:ci>W</m:ci>
	  <m:ci>B</m:ci>
	</m:apply>
      </m:math> is not too small) then for either capacitor (assuming
      unit length into the picture) we will get a value

      <equation id="eqn1">
	<m:math>
	  <m:apply>
	    <m:eq/>
	    <m:ci>C</m:ci>
	    <m:apply>
	      <m:divide/>
	      <m:apply>
		<m:times/>
		<m:ci>ε</m:ci>
		<m:ci>W</m:ci>
	      </m:apply>
	      <m:apply>
		<m:divide/>
		<m:ci>B</m:ci>
		<m:cn>2</m:cn>
	      </m:apply>
	    </m:apply>
	  </m:apply>
	</m:math>
      </equation>

      since the value of a capacitor is just the dielectric constant
      times the area of the plates, divided by the spacing of the
      plates.
    </para>

    <para id="para2">Looking quickly at <cnxn target="fig1"/> you
      might think the two capacitors are in series, but you would be
      wrong! Note that each capacitor has one lead connected to the
      center conductor and the other lead connected to ground, and so
      the two capacitors are in fact, in parallel, and hence their
      capacitances add. Thus, for the capacitance per unit length for
      this line, we can write:

      <equation id="eqn2">
	<m:math>
	  <m:apply>
	    <m:eq/>
	    <m:mi fontweight="bold">C</m:mi>
	    <m:apply>
	      <m:divide/>
	      <m:apply>
		<m:times/>
		<m:cn>4</m:cn>
		<m:ci>ε</m:ci>
		<m:ci>W</m:ci>
	      </m:apply>
	      <m:ci>B</m:ci>
	    </m:apply>
	  </m:apply>
	</m:math>
      </equation>

      It can be shown (although we won't do it here) that for
      <emphasis>any</emphasis> transmission line where the electric
      and magnetic fields are perpendicular to one another (called
      <term>TEM</term> or <term>transverse electromagnetic</term>) the
      speed of propagation of the wave down the line is just

      <equation id="eqn3">
	<m:math>
	  <m:apply>
	    <m:eq/>
	    <m:msub>
	      <m:mi>v</m:mi>
	      <m:mi>p</m:mi>
	    </m:msub>
	    <m:apply>
	      <m:divide/>
	      <m:ci>c</m:ci>
	      <m:apply>
		<m:root/>
		<m:apply>
		  <m:divide/>
		  <m:ci>ε</m:ci>
		  <m:msub>
		    <m:mi>ε</m:mi>
		    <m:mn>0</m:mn>
		  </m:msub>
		</m:apply>
	      </m:apply>
	    </m:apply>
	    <m:apply>
	      <m:divide/>
	      <m:apply>
		<m:times/>
		<m:cn>3</m:cn>
		<m:apply>
		  <m:power/>
		  <m:cn>10</m:cn>
		  <m:cn>8</m:cn>
		</m:apply>
		<m:apply>
		  <m:divide/>
		  <m:mi>m</m:mi>
		  <m:mi>s</m:mi>
		</m:apply>
	      </m:apply>
	      <m:apply>
		<m:root/>
		<m:msub>
		  <m:mi>ε</m:mi>
		  <m:mi>r</m:mi>
		</m:msub>
	      </m:apply>
	    </m:apply>
	  </m:apply>
	</m:math>
      </equation>

      Where
      <m:math>
	<m:msub>
	  <m:mi>ε</m:mi>
	  <m:mi>r</m:mi>
	</m:msub>
      </m:math> is called the <term>relative dielectric constant
      </term> for the material. Well, we also know that
      
      <equation id="eqn4">
	<m:math>
	  <m:apply>
	    <m:eq/>
	    <m:msub>
	      <m:mi>v</m:mi>
	      <m:mi>p</m:mi>
	    </m:msub>
	    <m:apply>
	      <m:divide/>
	      <m:cn>1</m:cn>
	      <m:apply>
		<m:root/>
		<m:apply>
		  <m:times/>
		  <m:mi fontweight="bold">L</m:mi>
		  <m:mi fontweight="bold">C</m:mi>
		</m:apply>
	      </m:apply>
	    </m:apply>
	  </m:apply>
	</m:math>
      </equation>

      From which we can write
      <equation id="eqn5">
	<m:math>
	  <m:apply>
	    <m:eq/>
	    <m:mi fontweight="bold">L</m:mi>
	    <m:apply>
	      <m:divide/>
	      <m:cn>1</m:cn>
	      <m:apply>
		<m:times/>
		<m:apply>
		  <m:power/>
		  <m:msub>
		    <m:mi>v</m:mi>
		    <m:mi>p</m:mi>
		  </m:msub>
		  <m:cn>2</m:cn>
		</m:apply>
		<m:mi fontweight="bold">C</m:mi>
	      </m:apply>
	    </m:apply>
	    <m:apply>
	      <m:divide/>
	      <m:ci>B</m:ci>
	      <m:apply>
		<m:times/>
		<m:apply>
		  <m:power/>
		  <m:msub>
		    <m:mi>v</m:mi>
		    <m:mi>p</m:mi>
		  </m:msub>
		  <m:cn>2</m:cn>
		</m:apply>
		<m:cn>4</m:cn>
		<m:ci>ε</m:ci>
		<m:ci>W</m:ci>
	      </m:apply>
	    </m:apply>
	  </m:apply>
	</m:math>
      </equation>

      We can now insert this value for <m:math><m:mi fontweight="bold">L</m:mi></m:math>
      into the expression for
      <m:math>
	<m:msub>
	  <m:mi>Z</m:mi>
	  <m:mn>0</m:mn>
	</m:msub>
      </m:math>, the impedance of the line.

      <equation id="eqn6">
	<m:math>
	  <m:apply>
	    <m:eq/>
	    <m:msub>
	      <m:mi>Z</m:mi>
	      <m:mn>0</m:mn>
	    </m:msub>
	    <m:apply>
	      <m:root/>
	      <m:apply>
		<m:divide/>
		<m:mi fontweight="bold">L</m:mi>
		<m:mi fontweight="bold">C</m:mi>
	      </m:apply>
	    </m:apply>
	    <m:apply>
	      <m:root/>
	      <m:apply>
		<m:divide/>
		<m:apply>
		  <m:divide/>
		  <m:ci>B</m:ci>
		  <m:apply>
		    <m:times/>
		    <m:apply>
		      <m:power/>
		      <m:msub>
			<m:mi>v</m:mi>
			<m:mi>p</m:mi>
		      </m:msub>
		      <m:cn>2</m:cn>
		    </m:apply>
		    <m:cn>4</m:cn>
		    <m:ci>ε</m:ci>
		    <m:ci>W</m:ci>
		  </m:apply>
		</m:apply>
		<m:apply>
		  <m:divide/>
		  <m:apply>
		    <m:times/>
		    <m:cn>4</m:cn>
		    <m:ci>ε</m:ci>
		    <m:ci>W</m:ci>
		  </m:apply>
		  <m:ci>B</m:ci>
		</m:apply>
	      </m:apply>
	    </m:apply>
	    <m:apply>
	      <m:divide/>
	      <m:ci>B</m:ci>
	      <m:apply>
		<m:times/>
		<m:cn>4</m:cn>
		<m:ci>ε</m:ci>
		<m:ci>W</m:ci>
		<m:msub>
		  <m:mi>v</m:mi>
		  <m:mi>p</m:mi>
		</m:msub>
	      </m:apply>
	    </m:apply>
	    <m:apply>
	      <m:divide/>
	      <m:ci>B</m:ci>
	      <m:apply>
		<m:times/>
		<m:cn>4</m:cn>
		<m:ci>ε</m:ci>
		<m:ci>W</m:ci>
		<m:apply>
		  <m:divide/>
		  <m:ci>c</m:ci>
		  <m:apply>
		    <m:root/>
		    <m:msub>
		      <m:mi>ε</m:mi>
		      <m:mi>r</m:mi>
		    </m:msub>
		  </m:apply>
		</m:apply>
	      </m:apply>
	    </m:apply>
	  </m:apply>
	</m:math>
      </equation>

      And so, we have derived an equation for the impedance
      <m:math>
	<m:msub>
	  <m:mi>Z</m:mi>
	  <m:mn>0</m:mn>
	</m:msub>
      </m:math> of the line in terms of the dimensions
      <m:math><m:ci>W</m:ci></m:math> and
      <m:math><m:ci>B</m:ci></m:math>, the dielectric constant of the
      insulating material, <m:math><m:ci>ε</m:ci></m:math>,
      and <m:math><m:ci>c</m:ci></m:math>, the speed of light.  How
      good is this expression, and in particular how good is our
      assumption that the electric field is all confined to the region
      under the conductor? Not so great actually <cnxn target="fig2"/>.

      <figure id="fig2">
	<name>Exact and Approximate Impedance For a Stripline</name>
	<media type="image/png" src="6.11.png"/>
	<caption>Exact and approximate
	  <m:math>
	    <m:msub>
	      <m:mi>Z</m:mi>
	      <m:mn>0</m:mn>
	    </m:msub>
	  </m:math> for a stripline
	</caption>
      </figure>

      <cnxn target="fig2"/> shows the results from using <cnxn target="eqn6"/> and a more exact calculation, which takes into
      account the fringing fields. As you can see we have to get the
      ratio
      <m:math>
	<m:apply>
	  <m:divide/>
	  <m:ci>W</m:ci>
	  <m:ci>B</m:ci>
	</m:apply>
      </m:math> up to about 4 or so before the two match. But at least
      we get the right behavior and we're not totally out of the ball park.
    </para>
  </content>
  
</document>
