Note:
Please note that you must have the most recent copy of Macromedia's Flash plugin installed to play the musical examples.
Listen to the following examples. How would you describe the
overall destiny? Choose "strong round-trip" if the work ends
with an unequivocal return to its starting point. Choose "weak
round-trip" if the end is an incomplete, insecure or more
tenuous return. Choose "one-way progression" if the music ends
in a significantly different way than it began.
Among the examples are several ambiguous ones. The distinction
between a strong round-trip and a one-way progression is an
emphatic one. However, the "weak round-trip" is a greyer
category, midway between the two extremes: ambivalent about its
return, but not decisive enough to have moved completely away.
The distinction between this middle category and the extreme
ones is not always clear-cut. Consider each example carefully
and be sure to come to your own conclusions: Wrestling with
ambiguity is an important feature of analysis and
interpretation. When it is appropriate, the answer key carefully
explores competing points-of-views. One of the telling features
of the ambiguous examples is that, in order to argue a position,
a deeper knowledge and more thoughtful hearing of the
whole score is required. Thus, using the
overall destiny as a starting point gradually draws you into the
content of the music.
Problem
1:
How would you describe the overall destiny?
Correct!
Incorrect.
The melody of Britten's This Little Babe
is the work's unwavering focus: First, the melody is
presented in unison by the chorus; then, it is
presented in close imitation; it repeats a third time,
with a double echo. Finally, at the culmination, the
melody is played once again in rhythmic unison, but
this time in slow motion with more
complex harmony. The piece ends triumphantly where it
began.
This movement ends with a powerful restatement of its
opening material. The sense of return is forceful and
decisive.
Are you sure? Try listening to the piece again.
Are you sure? Try listening to the piece again.
Problem
2:
How would you describe the overall destiny?
Correct!
Incorrect.
The movement closes with an ardent refrain of the opening
passage, creating a strong round-trip.
Are you sure? Try listening to the piece again.
Are you sure? Try listening to the piece again.
Problem
3:
How would you describe the overall destiny?
Correct!
Incorrect.
This piece distills a strong round-trip to a spare
essence. The work opens with a two-note chord,
repeated six times all by itself before anything else
happens. The two-note chord is then merged within a
more elaborate texture. Later, for a brief time, it
disappears. At the end, it reasserts itself--moving
at the same speed, in the same register. The piece
does not retrogress all the way back to the
opening's starkness: scattered other events occur;
the two-notes are merged within a more complex
sonority at the end. But the sense of return is
strong: The two-note chord creates a clear focal
point, and the end affirms this.
However, the answer is not entirely unambiguous. If
you answered "Weak Round-trip", then you may have
felt that the novelties at the end undermine the
clarity of the return. The pattern of repetition of
the two-note chord, for instance, differs. The
two-note chord is never left completely alone. The
concluding chord is dissonant and unresolved.
In my opinion, the novelties do not mar the identity
of the return. The ending is more complex, but the
two-note chord's presence is still resolute: Until the
last sonority, it is always attacked on its own,
without added notes. We have been introduced to the
two-note motive so clearly than we can easily identify
it, especially because not much else is happening.
"Home" is enriched, but it is still secure. That is
what marks this work as a "strong round-trip".
Are you sure? Try listening to the piece again.
Are you sure? Try listening to the piece again.
Problem
4:
How would you describe the overall destiny?
Correct!
Incorrect.
Are you sure? Try listening to the piece again.
The Ballade ends with an allusion to its opening
theme. However, the return is very brief: It sounds
almost parenthetical after the extended, very
tumultuous section that precedes it. Also, very
unexpectedly for music of this era, the Ballade ends
in a different key than it began: If you compare the
two examples below, you will notice that the theme
begins on a different repeated note.
If you answered "Strong Round-trip", then you clearly
noticed the return of the opening melody. However,
you did not give enough consideration to the fact that
the return is severely curtailed. Added to the fact
that the music ends in a different key, "Weak
Round-trip" is a more accurate answer.
If you answered "One-Way Progression," then you may
have put a lot of emphasis on the fact that the music
ends in a different key than it began. If the piece
were to have ended with the tumultuous music, or some
new material, then the sense of "One-way Progression"
would be unequivocal. However, Chopin incorporates a
glance back to the opening: "Weak Round-trip"
acknowledges this ambivalent retrospection.
Are you sure? Try listening to the piece again.
Problem
5:
How would you describe the overall destiny?
Correct!
Incorrect.
Are you sure? Try listening to the piece again.
The music ends where it began: with the same
instrument (oboe) playing the same solo melody.
However, the concluding solo is at a higher pitch
level, and is cut off unexpectedly. (Varèse
abbreviates the oboe melody so that the first movement
flows more rapidly into the second.)
If you answered "Strong Round-trip," you may have
felt that, in a musical language with so much
suspenseful tension and dense combination of sound,
the final solo acts as a "resolution," even if
it is incomplete. Those perceptions are valid.
However, "Weak Round-trip" is a more accurate
answer, because it allows for the possibility that the
melody could have returned at its original pitch level
and in complete form.
If you answered "One-way Progression," you may
have put particular emphasis on the fact that the
melody returns in a new transposition. If a different
instrument--for instance, the flute--had been
playing, or if there had been more drastic
transformations--for instance, a highly embellished
melody--the sense of "one-way progression" would
indeed have been strong. "Weak round-trip"
acknowledges that the feeling of return is still
palpable.
Are you sure? Try listening to the piece again.
Problem
6:
How would you describe the overall destiny?
Correct!
Incorrect.
Hindemith’s song “Argwohn Josephs” from Das Marienleben ends with an unequivocal return to the opening. It is a strong roundtrip.
Problem
7:
How would you describe the overall destiny?
Correct!
Incorrect.
Are you sure? Try listening to the piece again.
Schoenberg's song "Nacht" begins with soft, slow
moving music, filled with foreboding, in the low
registers of the bass clarinet, cello and piano.
Gradually, the music builds in intensity and rhythmic
action, culminating in a climactically loud arrival.
The music then subsides, sinking lower and getting
softer, until it eventually returns to its original
low register, soft dynamic and slow speed. In
addition, the voice is singing the same line of text.
The arch-like rise from the depths and return back
downwards marks this movement as a round-trip.
But which kind, "strong" or "weak"? On the basis of
the arch-like trajectory of the rhythm, texture and
dynamics, a good case could be made for a "strong
round-trip."
However, Schoenberg disguises the ending's motivic
relationship to the beginning. At the opening of
Nacht, the piano opens with a three-note motive, which
is imitated by the cello and bass clarinet. This
motive, so clearly echoed, is the basis for the entire
movement. At the end, the motive's presence is
veiled: The piano replays the motive underneath the
voice, but the cello and clarinet no longer imitate it
exactly. Furthermore, it may take several hearings to
notice the motive is spelled out by the last three
chords. The music has made it back to its origin, but
ambiguity intrudes. In the Piano Piece, opus 11, the
return to the opening dyad is still explicit. At the
end of "Nacht," the motive's presence is more nuanced.
The answer "weak round-trip" better captures this
equivocation.
Are you sure? Try listening to the piece again.
Problem
8:
How would you describe the overall destiny?
Correct!
Incorrect.
Are you sure? Try listening to the piece again.
Are you sure? Try listening to the piece again.
The first movement of Berg's Four Pieces for
Clarinet and Piano is an example of the ending
contradicting its opening. The piece begins with a
gentle, forward-moving clarinet melody--first alone,
then accompanied by the piano. About mid-way through
the piece, the clarinet drives into its low register
with a raspy exclamation. This gesture acts almost
like a curtain on the first part of the piece. From
then on, the music evolves new characteristics. By
the end, both clarinet and piano have become very
static: The clarinet anchored on a softly repeating
low note; the piano with a dense, repeating chord.
There is no harmony at the beginning; at the end, the
melodic motion is frozen and there is only harmony.
At the opening, the music is concentrated in the
middle registers. At the end, the piece stretches
between the extremes of the piano: Both the work's
highest and lowest notes occur in its closing chords.
At the opening, the clarinet changes speed fluidly and
unpredictably. At the close, the clarinet's rhythm
is a more straightforward slowing down. Thus, the
work ends in a very different way than it began.
If you answered "Weak Round-trip," then perhaps
you noticed a subtle connection: The first notes of
the clarinet solo are collected into the final chord.
However, this is a radical transformation: What was
horizontal has become vertical; what lay close
together in register has been exploded in range.
Also, the notes are all rearranged in space: The high
point of the melody is the low point of the chord!
When so much has changed, the sense of return becomes
very tenuous and obscure.
Problem
9:
How would you describe the overall destiny?
Correct!
Incorrect.
Are you sure? Try listening to the piece again.
Are you sure? Try listening to the piece again.
Ligeti's Desordre is an example of a
continuous progression that carries the music far from
where it started. The work moves continuously with an
unchanging fast pulse. The pitches in each hand are
fixed: the seven notes of the C-Major scale in the
right hand, the remaining five notes of the chromatic
scale in the left. A melody, played in imitation
between the hands, repeats over and over again in its
entirety, rising steadily in register. At the end,
the work reaches its highest peak, with both hands
rising to the extreme high of the piano. There is a
clear sense of transit without return.
Furthermore, the work is designed so that nothing ever
happens the same way twice. The relationship between
the hands becomes extremely unpredictable and complex.
Ligeti expands and contracts the main melody in
different ways in each hand, making them fall more and
more out of alignment--and creating the disorder to
which the title refers. By the end, the left hand's
irregularities are magnified, twisting its original
form completely out of shape. Finally, the piece ends
just before the melody is about
to be replayed on the same pitch with which it
began--thus, a round-trip is avoided.
If you answered "Weak Round-trip," then you may have
noticed an arch-like shape created by the melody's
speed: While the fast pulse remains constant, the
melody accelerates towards the midpoint of the piece,
then relaxes back to its original speed. However, the
piece doesn't end there: It continues onwards and
upwards, evolving new relationships between the hands.
Desordre is moving away from its origin
when it concludes. Thus, "one-way progression" is a
stronger answer.
FURTHER LISTENING: Schubert's song "Der Doppelganger" and Hugo Wolf's song "Verlasse Magdlein" are 19th-century examples of weak roundtrips. In each case, the music's overall destiny potently reflects the text. Mel Powell's "String Quartet" is a modern example of a one-way progression. The composer described the piece as a "ball of yarn gradually unfurling." The single movement quartet begins with dense, turbulent activity in which the four players play independently. It gradually works itself towards a single line melody--which the composer playfully called "Jewish boogie-woogie"--played in unison by the quartet.