<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE document PUBLIC "-//CNX//DTD CNXML 0.5//EN" "http://cnx.rice.edu/cnxml/0.5/DTD/cnxml_plain.dtd">
<document xmlns="http://cnx.rice.edu/cnxml" xmlns:md="http://cnx.rice.edu/mdml/0.4" xmlns:bib="http://bibtexml.sf.net/" id="Module.2003-10-08.0348">
  <name>Modes and Ragas: More Than just a Scale</name>
  <metadata>
  <md:version>1.9</md:version>
  <md:created>2003/10/08 10:03:48 GMT-5</md:created>
  <md:revised>2007/10/04 11:43:05.369 GMT-5</md:revised>
  <md:authorlist>
      <md:author id="Catherine">
      <md:firstname>Catherine</md:firstname>
      <md:othername>A.</md:othername>
      <md:surname>Schmidt-Jones</md:surname>
      <md:email>casjones@soltec.net</md:email>
    </md:author>
  </md:authorlist>

  <md:maintainerlist>
    <md:maintainer id="Catherine">
      <md:firstname>Catherine</md:firstname>
      <md:othername>A.</md:othername>
      <md:surname>Schmidt-Jones</md:surname>
      <md:email>casjones@soltec.net</md:email>
    </md:maintainer>
  </md:maintainerlist>
  
  <md:keywordlist>
    <md:keyword>aeolian</md:keyword>
    <md:keyword>chant</md:keyword>
    <md:keyword>church modes</md:keyword>
    <md:keyword>dorian</md:keyword>
    <md:keyword>Greek modes</md:keyword>
    <md:keyword>India</md:keyword>
    <md:keyword>Indian music</md:keyword>
    <md:keyword>ionian</md:keyword>
    <md:keyword>jazz</md:keyword>
    <md:keyword>locrian</md:keyword>
    <md:keyword>lydian</md:keyword>
    <md:keyword>medieval</md:keyword>
    <md:keyword>medieval modes</md:keyword>
    <md:keyword>mixolydian</md:keyword>
    <md:keyword>modal</md:keyword>
    <md:keyword>mode</md:keyword>
    <md:keyword>phrygian</md:keyword>
    <md:keyword>raga</md:keyword>
    <md:keyword>scale</md:keyword>
  </md:keywordlist>

  <md:abstract>Many musical traditions, in history as well as in the modern world, are based on modes or ragas rather than on major and minor scales.</md:abstract>
</metadata>

  <content>
    
  <section id="s0">
    <name>Introduction</name>
    
    <para id="p0a">In many music traditions, including <cnxn document="m11421">Western music</cnxn>, the list of all the notes that are expected or allowed in a particular piece of music is a <cnxn document="m10851">scale</cnxn>. A long tradition of using scales in particular ways has trained listeners to expect certain things from a piece of music. If you hear a song in C major, for example, not only will your ear/brain expect to hear the notes from the C <cnxn document="m10851">major scale</cnxn>, it will expect to hear them grouped into certain <cnxn document="m11654" target="l0b">chords</cnxn>, and it will expect the chords to follow each other in certain patterns (<cnxn document="m11654" target="l0b">chord progressions</cnxn>) and to end in a certain way (a <cnxn document="m12402">cadence</cnxn>). You don't have to have any musical training at all to have these expectations; you only need to have grown up in a culture that listens to this kind of music. 
    </para>
    <para id="p0ab">
The expectations for music in a minor key are a little different than for music in a major key. But it is important to notice that you can move that song in C major to E major, G flat major, or any other major key. It will sound basically the same, except that it will sound higher or lower. In the same way, all minor keys are so alike that music can easily be <term>transposed</term> from one minor key to another. (For more on this subject, see <cnxn document="m10851">Major Scales</cnxn>, <cnxn document="m10856" strength="9">Minor Scales</cnxn>, <cnxn document="m11636">Scales that aren't Major or Minor</cnxn>, and <cnxn document="m10668" strength="8">Transposition</cnxn>.)
    </para>
    <para id="p0b">
This sameness is not true for musical traditions that use modes instead of scales. In these traditions, <emphasis>the <term>mode</term>, like a scale, lists the notes that are used in a piece of music. But each mode comes with a different set of expectations in how those notes will be used and arranged.</emphasis>
    </para>
    <figure id="fig0a"><name>Comparison of Scale and Mode</name>
<media type="application/postscript" src="ScalevsMode-0.eps">
      <media type="image/png" src="ScalevsMode.png"/>
</media>
      <caption>
Compare the differences and similarities between the two major scales, and the differences and similarities between the two medieval church modes.
      </caption>
    </figure>

    <para id="p0c"><cnxn target="fig0a"/> shows two scales and two modes. The two <cnxn document="m10851">major scales</cnxn> use different notes, but the relationship of the notes to each other is very similar. For example, the pattern of <cnxn document="m10866">half steps and whole steps</cnxn> in each one is the same, and the <cnxn document="m10867">interval</cnxn> (distance) between the <cnxn document="m10851" target="p1a">tonic</cnxn> and the <cnxn document="m11643" target="s3">dominant</cnxn> is the same. Compare this to the two church modes. The pattern of whole steps and half steps within the <cnxn document="m10862">octave</cnxn> is different; this would have a major effect on a chant, which would generally stay within the one octave range.  Also, the interval between the <cnxn target="p2a">finalis</cnxn> and the <cnxn target="p2a">dominant</cnxn> is different, and they are in different places within the <cnxn document="m12381">range</cnxn> of the mode. The result is that music in one mode would sound quite different than music in the other mode. You can't simply <cnxn document="m10668">transpose</cnxn> music from one mode to another as you do with scales and keys; modes are too different.
    </para>

  </section>

  <section id="s1">
    <name>The Classical Greek Modes</name>

    <para id="p1a">We can only guess what music from ancient Greek and Roman times really sounded like. They didn't leave any recordings, of course, nor did they write down their music. But they did write about music, so we know that they used modes based on tetrachords. A <term>tetrachord</term> is a mini-scale of four notes, in descending <cnxn document="m10943">pitch</cnxn> order, that are contained within a <cnxn document="m10867" target="s21">perfect fourth</cnxn> (five <cnxn document="m10866">half steps</cnxn>) instead of an <cnxn document="m10862">octave</cnxn> (twelve half steps).
    </para>
    <figure id="fig1a"><name>Tetrachords</name>
<media type="application/postscript" src="tetrachords-0.eps">
      <media type="image/png" src="tetrachords.png"/>
</media>
      <caption>
Here are three possible Greek tetrachords, as nearly as they can be written in modern notation. The outer notes are a perfect fourth apart; we can be pretty certain of that, since the perfect fourth is a natural interval playable, for example, on many ancient wind instruments (See <cnxn document="m13686">Harmonic Series II</cnxn> and <cnxn document="m10867">Interval</cnxn>). The actual tuning of the inner notes can only be guessed, however, since our <cnxn document="m11639" target="s22">equal temperament</cnxn> is a relatively modern invention.
      </caption>
    </figure>
    <para id="element-553">
Since a tetrachord fills the interval of a <cnxn document="m10867" target="p21b">perfect fourth</cnxn>, two tetrachords with a <cnxn document="m10866">whole step</cnxn> between the end of one and the beginning of the other will fill an octave. Different Greek modes were built from different combinations of tetrachords.
  </para><para id="p1b">
    <figure id="fig1b"><media type="application/postscript" src="GreekMode-0.eps">
<media type="image/png" src="GreekMode.png"/>
</media>
<caption>Each Greek mode was built of two tetrachords in a row, filling an octave.</caption>
    </figure>
We have very detailed descriptions of tetrachords and of Greek music theory (for example, <cite>Harmonics</cite>, written by Aristoxenus in the fourth century B.C.), but there is still no way of knowing exactly what the music really sounded like. The enharmonic, chromatic, and diatonic tetrachords mentioned in ancient descriptions are often now written as in the figure above. But references in the old texts to "shading" suggest that the reality was more complex, and that they probably did not use the same intervals we do. It is more likely that ancient Greek music sounded more like other traditional Mediterranean and Middle Eastern musics than that it sounded anything like modern <cnxn document="m11421">Western</cnxn> music.
    </para>
    <para id="p1c"><cnxn document="m11421">Western</cnxn> composers often consistently choose <cnxn document="m10856">minor</cnxn> keys over <cnxn document="m10851">major</cnxn> keys (or vice versa) to convey certain moods (minor for melancholy, for example, and major for serene). One interesting aspect of Greek modes is that different modes were considered to have very different effects, not only on a person's mood, but even on character and morality.  This may also be another clue that ancient modes may have had more variety of tuning and pitch than modern keys do.
    </para>

  </section>
  <section id="s2">
    <name>The Medieval Church Modes</name>

    <para id="p2a">Sacred music in the middle ages in Western Europe - Gregorian chant, for example - was also modal, and the medieval <term>Church modes</term> were also considered to have different effects on the listener. (As of this writing the site <link src="http://www.recorderhomepage.net/galilei.html">Ricercares by Vincenzo Galilei</link> had a list of the "ethos" or mood associated with each medieval mode.) In fact, the names of the church modes were borrowed from the Greek modes, but the two systems don't really correspond to each other, or use the same name to indicate the same set of intervals. So some books prefer to name the church modes using a Roman numeral system. Each of these modes can easily be found by playing its one octave range, or <term>ambitus</term>, on the "white key" notes on a piano. But the Dorian mode, for example, didn't have to start on the pitch we call a D. The important thing was the pattern of half steps and whole steps within that octave, and their relationship to the notes that acted as the modal equivalent of <cnxn document="m10851">tonal centers</cnxn>, the <foreign>finalis</foreign> and the <foreign>dominant</foreign>. Generally, the last note of the piece was the <term>finalis</term>, giving it the same "resting place" function as a modern tonal center. The <term>dominant</term>, also called the <term>reciting tone</term> or <term>tenor</term>, was the note most often used for long recitations on the same pitch.</para>
    <figure id="fig2a"><media type="application/postscript" src="ChurchModes-0.eps">
<media type="image/png" src="ChurchModes.png"/>
</media>
      <caption>
The modes came in pairs which shared the same <foreign>finalis</foreign>.
      </caption>
    </figure>
    <para id="p2b">A mode can be found by playing all the "white key" notes on a piano for one octave. From D to D, for example is Dorian; from F to F is Lydian. Notice that no modes begin on A, B, or C. This is because a B flat was allowed, and the modes beginning on D, E, and F, when they use a B flat, have the same note patterns and relationships as would modes beginning on A, B, and C. After the middle ages, modes beginning on A, B, and C were named, but they are still not considered Church modes. Notice that the Aeolian (or the Dorian using a B flat) is the same as an A (or D) <cnxn document="m10856" target="p2a">natural minor</cnxn> scale and the Ionian (or the Lydian using a B flat) is the same as a C (or F) major scale. 
    </para>
    <figure id="fig2b"><media type="application/postscript" src="othermodes-0.eps">
<media type="image/png" src="othermodes.png"/>
</media>
      <caption>
These modes are part of the same theoretical system as the church modes, but they were not used.
      </caption>
    </figure>

     <para id="element-983">In our modern tonal system, any note may be <cnxn document="m10943">sharp, flat, or natural</cnxn>, but in this modal system, only the B was allowed to vary. The symbols used to indicate whether the B was "hard" (our B natural) or "soft" (our B flat) eventually evolved into our symbols for sharps, flats, and naturals. All of this may seem very arbitrary, but it's important to remember that medieval mode theory, just like our modern music theory, was not trying to invent a logical system of music. It was trying to explain, describe, and systematize musical practices that were already flourishing because people liked the way they sounded.
  </para>
      <figure id="fig2c"><media type="application/postscript" src="HardSoftB-0.eps">
<media type="image/png" src="HardSoftB.png"/>
</media>
      <caption>
The modern symbols for sharp, natural, and flat evolved from medieval notation indicating what type of B should be used.
      </caption>
    </figure>
  <para id="p2c">The <cnxn document="m11639">tuning system</cnxn> used in medieval Europe was also not our familiar <cnxn document="m11639" target="s22">equal temperament</cnxn> system. It was a <cnxn document="m11639" target="p12a">just intonation</cnxn> system, based on a <cnxn document="m11639" target="s11">pure</cnxn> <cnxn document="m10867" target="p21a">perfect fifth</cnxn>. In this system, <cnxn document="m10866">half steps</cnxn> are not all equal to each other. Slight adjustments are made in tuning and intervals to make them more pleasant to the ear; and the medieval ear had different preferences than our modern ears. This is another reason that modes sounded very different from each other, although that particular difference may be missing today when chant is sung using equal temperament.
    </para>

  </section>

  <section id="s6">
   <name>Modal Jazz and Folk Music</name>
   
    <para id="p6a">Some jazz and folk music is also considered modal and also uses the Greek/medieval mode names. In this case, the scales used are the same as the medieval church modes, but they do not have a reciting tone and are used much more like modern major and minor scales. Modal European (and American) folk music tends to be older tunes that have been around for hundreds of years. Modal jazz, on the other hand, is fairly new, having developed around 1960.
    </para>
    <para id="p6b">
It is important to remember when discussing these types of music that it does not matter what specific note the modal scale starts on. What matters is the pattern of notes within the scale, and the relationship of the pattern to the <cnxn document="m10851" target="p1a">tonic</cnxn>/<cnxn document="m11633" target="p2a">finalis</cnxn>. For example, note that the Dorian "scale" as written above starts on a D but basically has a C major key signature, resulting in the third and seventh notes of the scale being a <cnxn document="m10866">half step</cnxn> lower than in a D major scale. (A jazz musician would call this <term>flatted</term> or <term>flat</term> thirds and sevenths.) So <emphasis>any scale with a flatted third and seventh can be called a Dorian scale</emphasis>.
    </para>
 <exercise id="ex6a">
  <problem>
    <para id="pex6a">You need to know your <cnxn document="m10851">major keys</cnxn> and <cnxn document="m10867">intervals</cnxn> to do this problem. Use the list of "white key" modes in <cnxn target="fig2a"/> to figure out the following information for each of the four modes below. Before looking at the solutions, check your own answers to make sure that the answers you get for step 2 and step 4 are in agreement with each other.
    </para>
    <list id="problem" type="enumerated"><item>
List the flats and sharps you would use if this were a major scale rather than a mode.
      </item>
      <item>
In this mode, which scale tones are raised or lowered from the major key?
      </item>
      <item>
What is the interval between the mode and the major key with the same key signature?
      </item>
      <item>
List the flats or sharps in this key signature.
      </item>
      <item>
Write one octave of notes in this mode. You may print out this <link src="staffpaper1.pdf">PDF file</link> if you need staff paper. Check to make sure that your "modal scale" agrees with all the things that you have written about it already.
      </item>
    </list>
    <list id="element-783" type="enumerated"><name>Example</name>
<item>
D major has 2 sharps: F sharp and C sharp. 
</item>
<item>
Looking at <cnxn target="fig2a"/>, you can see that the Lydian mode starts on an F. The key of F major would have a B flat, but in the mode this is raised one half step, to B natural. Therefore <emphasis>the fourth degree of the Lydian mode is raised one half step</emphasis>.
</item>
	<item>F lydian has the same key signature as C major, which is a perfect fourth lower. So all Lydian modes have the same key signature as the major key a perfect fourth below them.</item>
	<item>We want D Lydian. The major scale beginning a perfect fourth below D major is A major. A major has three sharps: F sharp, C sharp and G sharp. Adding a G sharp does raise the fourth degree of the scale by one half step, just as predicted in step 2.</item></list><figure id="figexample"><name>Example: D Lydian</name>
<media type="application/postscript" src="D-Lydian-0.eps">
      <media type="image/png" src="D-Lydian.png"/>
    </media></figure>
    <list id="modes" type="enumerated"><item>
A Dorian
      </item>
      <item>
C Lydian
      </item>
      <item>
B flat Mixolydian
      </item>
      <item>
D Phrygian
      </item>
    </list>
  </problem>
  <solution>
    <figure id="fig6a"><media type="application/postscript" src="modeproblem-0.eps">
<media type="image/png" src="modeproblem.png"/>
    </media></figure>
  </solution>
 </exercise>

  </section>

  <section id="s3">
    <name>The Ragas of Classical Indian Music</name>

    <para id="p3a">
The <cnxn document="m12459">ragas</cnxn> of classical India and other, similar traditions, are more like modes than they are like scales. Like modes, different <foreign>raga</foreign>s sound very different from each other, for several reasons. They may have different interval patterns between the "scale" notes, have different expectations for how each note of the <foreign>raga</foreign> is to be used, and may even use slightly different tunings. Like the modal musics discussed above, individual Indian <foreign>raga</foreign>s are associated with specific moods.
    </para>
    <para id="p3aa">In fact, in practice, <foreign>raga</foreign>s are even more different from each other than the medieval European modes were. The <foreign>raga</foreign> dictates how each note should be used, more specifically than a modal or major-minor system does. Some pitches will get more emphasis than others; some will be used one way in an ascending melody and another way in a descending melody; some will be used in certain types of ornaments. And these rules differ from one <foreign>raga</foreign> to the next. The result is that each <foreign>raga</foreign> is a collection of melodic scales, phrases, motifs, and ornaments, that may be used together to construct music in that <foreign>raga</foreign>. The number of possible ragas is practically limitless, and there are hundreds in common use. A good performer will be familiar with dozens of <foreign>raga</foreign>s and can improvise music - traditional classical music in India is improvised - using the accepted format for each <foreign>raga</foreign>. 
    </para>
    <para id="p3b">The <foreign>raga</foreign> even affects the tuning of the notes. Indian classical music is usually accompanied by a <foreign>tanpura</foreign>, which plays a drone background. The <foreign>tanpura</foreign> is usually tuned to a <cnxn document="m11639" target="s11">pure</cnxn> <cnxn document="m10867" target="p21a">perfect fifth</cnxn>, so, just as in medieval European music, the tuning system is a <cnxn document="m11639" target="p12a">just intonation</cnxn> system. As in <cnxn document="m11421">Western</cnxn> just intonation, the octave is divided into twelve possible notes, only some of which are used in a particular <foreign>raga</foreign> (just as Westerners use only some of the twelve notes in each key). But as was true for the <cnxn target="s2">church modes</cnxn>, using the pure perfect fifth means that some "half steps" will be larger than others. (If you would like to understand why this is so, please see <cnxn document="m13686">Harmonic Series II</cnxn> and <cnxn document="m11639">Tuning Systems</cnxn>.) Even though the variations between these different "half steps" are small, they strongly affect the sound of the music. So, the tuning of some of the notes (not the ones dictated by the <foreign>tanpura</foreign>) may be adjusted to better suit a particular <foreign>raga</foreign>. (Please see <cnxn document="m12502">Listening to Indian Classical Music</cnxn> and <cnxn document="m12459">Indian Classical Music: Tuning and Ragas</cnxn> for more information on this subject.)
    </para>

  </section>

  <section id="s4">
    <name>Other Non-Western Modal Musics</name>

    <para id="p4a">To the average Western listener, medieval European chant and classical Indian music are the two most familiar traditions that are not based on major and minor scales. But many other musical traditions around the world are not based on Western scales. Some of these have modes similar to the medieval Church modes; they also tend to be a list of notes (or a pattern of <cnxn document="m10867">intervals</cnxn>) used with a specific <foreign>finalis</foreign>, which may encourage certain types of melodies. While the church mode/jazz mode tradition features <cnxn document="m11421" target="p7f">diatonic</cnxn> modes (which can be played using only the white keys of a piano), non-Western modes may use <cnxn document="m11636">other types of scales</cnxn>. 
    </para>
    <para id="p4b">In other music traditions, modes are much more like Indian <foreign>ragas</foreign>, featuring important variations in tuning and melodic expectations from one mode to the next, so that each mode may be seen as a collection of related melodic ideas, phrases, and ornamentations that are traditionally played with a certain set of notes tuned in a certain way. (Some non-Indian traditions even use the term <foreign>raga</foreign>.) All of these musics have long traditions that are very different from the familiar major-minor tonal system, and usually also have a different approach to harmony, rhythm, and performance practice.
    </para>

  </section>
  <section id="s5">
    <name>Bibliography</name>

    <para id="p5a">Donald Jay Grout's <cite>A History of Western Music</cite> introduces both Greek and medieval modes. Lee Evans's <cite>Modes and Their Use in Jazz</cite> is both comprehensive and accessible for any musician who wants to begin to study that subject. For Western musicians, an introduction to <foreign>ragas</foreign>, that is neither too vague nor too technical, does not seem to be available as of this writing.
    </para>

  </section>

  </content>
  
</document>
