Thanks to the growth of the World Wide Web over the past decade or so, vast amounts of information are available to anyone in possession of a personal computer with a modem and an Internet connection. Tasks such as finding a favorite poem have been made easy by search engines like Google. One can simply type in a few lines from the poem, and then it’s just a matter of sorting through a few top matches before one has the entire poem on the screen.
While searching textual media is fairly trivial, looking for an image that you have seen before can be a huge problem. If you remember seeing an interesting painting, say Leonardo da Vinci’s Mona Lisa, after walking through a museum, and you’d like to find information on it online, unless you have a word or phrase associated with the painting, such as da Vinci or Mona Lisa, it would be difficult to find any information about the particular work of art. You might be able to find the painting online in some subject-specific database such as an online art gallery; however, such databases for most subjects are fairly uncommon.
Example 1
| Mona Lisa |
|---|
![]() |
When in search of this work of art, while one may not have textual information related to the painting, one usually does have some information about the image in question; that is, the person has a coarse-scale idea of what the Mona Lisa, for instance, looks like. This information should be fairly useful for finding an actual image of the Mona Lisa, but given current techniques, searches for visual data break down as effective strategies when the database size increases to even a small fraction of the number of images on the World Wide Web.










"assafdf"