Skip to content Skip to navigation

Connexions

You are here: Home » Content » The Complex Wavelet Approach

Navigation

Content Actions

Lenses

What is a lens?

Definition of a lens

Lenses

A lens is a custom view of Connexions content. You can think of it as a fancy kind of list that will let you see Connexions through the eyes of organizations and people you trust.

What is in a lens?

Lens makers point to Connexions materials (modules and collections), creating a guide that includes their own comments and descriptive tags about the content.

Who can create a lens?

Any individual Connexions member, a community, or a respected organization.

This content is ...

Affiliated with (What does "Affiliated with" mean?)

This content is either by members of the organizations listed or about topics related to the organizations listed. Click each link to see a list of all content affiliated with the organization.
  • Rice University ELEC 301 Projects

    This module is included inLens: Rice University ELEC 301 Project Lens
    By: Rice University ELEC 301As a part of collection:"ECE 301 Projects Fall 2003"

    Click the "Rice University ELEC 301 Projects" link to see all content affiliated with them.

  • Rice University OCW

    This module is included inLens: Rice University OpenCourseWare
    By: OpenCourseWare ConsortiumAs a part of collection:"ECE 301 Projects Fall 2003"

    Click the "Rice University OCW" link to see all content affiliated with them.

Tags

(What is a tag?)

These tags come from the endorsement, affiliation, and other lenses that include this content.

The Complex Wavelet Approach

Module by: Tom Mowad, Venkat Chandrasekaran

Summary: A description of our algorithm for generating signatures.

Our basic approach remains the same as that proposed by Jacobs et al. We compute the signatures of images in the database and compare them to the signature of the query. However, we propose a novel method to compute the signatures:

  1. Compute the CDWT of the image and find the magnitudes of the coefficients.
  2. Set all but the highest magnitude coefficients to 0.
  3. Set the remaining coefficients to +1. (No way to use –1 since magnitudes of complex numbers are always positive).
  4. Compute the two-dimensional DFT of each subband.
Figure 1
Figure 1 (our-approach.gif)

After step 3, the signature matrices correspond to the major feature points in an image. The +1’s characterize the image structure. Note that due to the high degree shift-invariance offered by the CDWT, the signature of a shifted image after step 3 will just be a shifted version of the signature of the original image (after step 3). Now, computing the DFT in each subband gets rid of these shift effects, since the magnitude of the DFT of both the signatures (after step 3) will be the same. In this manner, our proposed algorithm incorporates the multiresolution characteristics of the CDWT in addition to accounting for translations in the query image. We compare signatures by computing the L1 norm of the difference between the signature of an image in the database and that of its query.

An implementation of our algorithm is available on Owlnet at

~venkatc/elec301/tmproject/code/cdwt

The m-file for generating signatures is sig_gen.m, and the metric function for comparing signatures is metric.m.

Comments, questions, feedback, criticisms?

Send feedback