Connexions

You are here: Home » Content » DMT: Equalization and Approximation
Content Actions
Lenses

What is a lens?

Lenses

A lens is a custom view of Connexions content. You can think of it as a fancy kind of list that will let you see Connexions through the eyes of organizations and people you trust.

What is in a lens?

Lens makers point to Connexions materials (modules and collections), creating a guide that includes their own comments and descriptive tags about the content.

Who can create a lens?

Any individual Connexions member, a community, or a respected organization.

This content is ...
Affiliated with (?)
This content is either by members of the organizations listed or about topics related to the organizations listed. Click each link to see a list of all content affiliated with the organization.
  • This module is included inLens: Rice University ELEC 301 Project Lens
    By: Rice University ELEC 301As a part of collection:"ECE 301 Projects Fall 2003"

    Click the "Rice University ELEC 301 Projects" link to see all content affiliated with them.

    Rice University ELEC 301 Projects
  • This module is included inLens: Rice University OpenCourseWare
    By: OpenCourseWare ConsortiumAs a part of collection:"ECE 301 Projects Fall 2003"

    Click the "Rice University OCW" link to see all content affiliated with them.

    Rice University OCW
Tags

(?)

These tags come from the endorsement, affiliation, and other lenses that include this content.

DMT: Equalization and Approximation

Module by: Cosme Garza, Chris Sramek

Summary: Explains what happens during the process of approximation and equalization in our DMT project.

Equalization

In equalization, the received spectral coefficient blocks (i.e. after cyclic prefix removal and FFT) are adjusted to compensate for the frequency response of the channel (nothing can be done here about the additive noise). Due to the cyclic prefix, each block has essentially undergone cyclic convolution with the channel's impulse response. In the frequency domain, this is the same as if the spectral coefficients were pointwise multiplied by the frequency response of the channel. If the freq. response has no zeros and is known by the receiver, it is possible to perfectly remove the effect of the channel's filter. Since the channel pointwise multiplied the blocks by its freq. response, all that needs to be done is multiply the blocks pointwise by the 1 over the freq. response. Because we implemented the channel's impulse response as non-ideal low-pass, it's freq. response has no zeros and equalization is rather trivial.
Frequency response of equalizer
equalizerxfer1.jpg
Figure 1: This is the transfer function of the equalizer. If you compare it to the transfer function of the channel, you will see that the dips there correspond to the peaks here.

Approximation

After equalization, the effect of the channel's low-pass filter is removed, but the additive noise is still there. It manifests itself as causing the received constellation points to deviate from their location in the original constellation. To enable the bitstream to be recovered, a nearest-neighbor approximation is performed on each point. As long as the noise amplitude is small or the constellation points are far apart, it is unlikely that any single point will deviate enough from it's original location such that it has a new nearest-neighbor. With high noise power, however, the points are scattered all over the constellation; the nearest neighbor in this case is unlikely to be the original point. In our system, we implemented this approximation with a parser and look up table; we would examine each complex value in the blocks and compare it to every point in the constellation, selecting the closest point as the approximation.
Received constellation points (SNR = 52dB)
conststar.jpg
Figure 2
Received constellation points (SNR = 25dB)
conststar2.jpg
Figure 3
Our related MATLAB functions: filterchannel.m, approximate.m

Comments, questions, feedback, criticisms?

Send feedback