Skip to content Skip to navigation

Connexions

You are here: Home » Content » Conclusions

Navigation

Content Actions
  • Download module PDF
  • Add to ...
    Add the module to:
    • My Favorites
    • A lens
    • An external social bookmarking service
    • My Favorites (What is 'My Favorites'?)
      'My Favorites' is a special kind of lens which you can use to bookmark modules and collections directly in Connexions. 'My Favorites' can only be seen by you, and collections saved in 'My Favorites' can remember the last module you were on. You need a Connexions account to use 'My Favorites'.
    • A lens (What is a lens?)

      Definition of a lens

      Lenses

      A lens is a custom view of Connexions content. You can think of it as a fancy kind of list that will let you see Connexions through the eyes of organizations and people you trust.

      What is in a lens?

      Lens makers point to Connexions materials (modules and collections), creating a guide that includes their own comments and descriptive tags about the content.

      Who can create a lens?

      Any individual Connexions member, a community, or a respected organization.

      What are tags? tag icon

      Tags are descriptors added by lens makers to help label content, attaching a vocabulary that is meaningful in the context of the lens.

    • External bookmarks
  • E-mail the author
  • Rate this module (How does the rating system work?)

    Rating system

    Ratings

    Ratings allow you to judge the quality of modules. If other users have ranked the module then its average rating is displayed below. Ratings are calculated on a scale from one star (Poor) to five stars (Excellent).

    How to rate a module

    Hover over the star that corresponds to the rating you wish to assign. Click on the star to add your rating. Your rating should be based on the quality of the content. You must have an account and be logged in to rate content.

    		(0 ratings)

Lenses

What is a lens?

Definition of a lens

Lenses

A lens is a custom view of Connexions content. You can think of it as a fancy kind of list that will let you see Connexions through the eyes of organizations and people you trust.

What is in a lens?

Lens makers point to Connexions materials (modules and collections), creating a guide that includes their own comments and descriptive tags about the content.

Who can create a lens?

Any individual Connexions member, a community, or a respected organization.

What are tags? tag icon

Tags are descriptors added by lens makers to help label content, attaching a vocabulary that is meaningful in the context of the lens.

This content is ...

Affiliated with (What does "Affiliated with" mean?)

This content is either by members of the organizations listed or about topics related to the organizations listed. Click each link to see a list of all content affiliated with the organization.
  • Rice University ELEC 301 Projects

    This module is included inLens: Rice University ELEC 301 Project Lens
    By: Rice University ELEC 301As a part of collection:"ECE 301 Projects Fall 2003"

    Click the "Rice University ELEC 301 Projects" link to see all content affiliated with them.

Recently Viewed

This feature requires Javascript to be enabled.

Conclusions

Module by: Genaro Picazo

Summary: Conclusions for our ELEC 301 Project for Fall 2003. By: Chris Omidiran, Genaro Picazo, Ian Wells, Daniel Wu

Discoveries

Our results illustrate that redundant dictionaries can reveal the innate structure of signals - sharp lines and gradual changes in color can represent themselves as artifacts in a compressed image. The conciseness of the representations depends on both the dictionary chosen and the nature of the signal, the compression rates will vary depending on their similarities. In real world situations, ie those in which we could gather an idea of the kind of signal we were trying to represent, it would be possible to choose a more "fitting" basis. This project was very effective at helping us to better understand the basics of signal processing in different domains.

Unfortunately, a comparison of the images generated with a non-redundant basis, as opposed to those with an overcomplete basis, suggests that compression schemes that use a single basis are superior to the new, multiple basis schemes (with the exception of the dirac basis). It is important to understand, however, that this is probably due to the very nature of a greedy algorithm (particularly their propensity to paint themselves into corners), and, as our research suggests, is one of the major unsolved problems facing the field of image compression over redundant dictionaries. Also, it should be noted that, while the images generated look different, they have very similiar levels of error when calculated strictly mathematically (ie power of the resultant over power of the original signal).

Future Work

Future studies can encompass determining better heuristics for basis selection, other algorithmic approaches to sparse approximations, and further optimizations. Applications could be generalized to other seemingly unrelated fields of study such as biological signal processing (imagine representing a heartbeat with a basis consisting of known healthy and sick heartbeats, and then diagnosing a condition based on the sparsity of the transformation), financial market analysis, and weather mapping.

Comments, questions, feedback, criticisms?

Send feedback