Skip to content Skip to navigation


You are here: Home » Content » Voice Conversion Experiment and Conclusion


Recently Viewed

This feature requires Javascript to be enabled.

Voice Conversion Experiment and Conclusion

Module by: Justin Chen. E-mail the author

Summary: The results of an experiment testing our voice conversion algorithm and possible ways to improve it.

Note: You are viewing an old version of this document. The latest version is available here.

Description of Experiment

To test our voice conversion algorithm, we administered a speaker identification test to twelve randomly selected people. Prior to the experiment, we recorded speech samples from four different speakers (two male and two female) and used our algorithm to convert between various combinations of their voices. For example, we took the sound of speaker #1 (the "source speaker") saying a certain phrase and converted it to the voice of speaker #2 (the "target speaker"). The participants listened to a series of these synthesized sounds, and we asked them to identify the speaker (the target) as well as the speaker's gender.

Results of Experiment

The target speaker was correctly identified 74% of the time.

The target speaker's gender was correctly identified 93% of the time.

Figure 1: The first bar, "Female to Female," indicates a conversion from a female source speaker to a female target speaker was correctly identified 83% of the time.
Graph of Gender-specific Conversion Accuracy
Graph of Gender-specific Conversion Accuracy (experiment.JPG)


Our voice conversion system was fairly effective at imitating a certain target speaker. From the "Gender-Specific Conversion Accuracy" graph, it can be implied that our system was better at converting female source speakers than male source speakers. One reason for this may be that the voices of the two male speakers used in the experiment had only a minor difference in pitch. The female speakers' voices, however, had a more noticeable difference.

Possible Improvements

At its current state, our system can only convert between two voices when it has samples of the speakers saying the same word or phrase. In order to make our system text-independent, we would need to implement neural mapping. This could be accomplished by using the cepstrum to identify certain characteristic sounds (such as vowel sounds) in the target speaker's speech sample and mapping their filters to the corresponding characteristic sounds in the source speaker's sample. In addition to adding text-independence to our system, we could add a band-pass filter at the end of our system to help eradicate speech artifacts in our synthesized sounds. The filter would block out frequencies that are not in the range of human speech.

Content actions

Download module as:

Add module to:

My Favorites (?)

'My Favorites' is a special kind of lens which you can use to bookmark modules and collections. 'My Favorites' can only be seen by you, and collections saved in 'My Favorites' can remember the last module you were on. You need an account to use 'My Favorites'.

| A lens I own (?)

Definition of a lens


A lens is a custom view of the content in the repository. You can think of it as a fancy kind of list that will let you see content through the eyes of organizations and people you trust.

What is in a lens?

Lens makers point to materials (modules and collections), creating a guide that includes their own comments and descriptive tags about the content.

Who can create a lens?

Any individual member, a community, or a respected organization.

What are tags? tag icon

Tags are descriptors added by lens makers to help label content, attaching a vocabulary that is meaningful in the context of the lens.

| External bookmarks