Skip to content Skip to navigation

Connexions

You are here: Home » Content » Current Research: DNA Barcode Abstract

Navigation

Recently Viewed

This feature requires Javascript to be enabled.

Current Research: DNA Barcode Abstract

Module by: Alison Fromme. E-mail the author

User rating (How does the rating system work?)
Ratings

Ratings allow you to judge the quality of modules. If other users have ranked the module then its average rating is displayed below. Ratings are calculated on a scale from one star (Poor) to five stars (Excellent).

How to rate a module

Hover over the star that corresponds to the rating you wish to assign. Click on the star to add your rating. Your rating should be based on the quality of the content. You must have an account and be logged in to rate content.

:
(0 ratings)

Summary: Is it possible to use DNA barcodes to identify species? Hebert et al 2004 studied birds to find out.

hebert-abstract.bmp

Identification of Birds through DNA Barcodes

Hebert et al. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0020312

ABSTRACT Scientific papers usually begin with an abstract, which is a summary of the work. Here, the abstract has been annotated in italics to enhance your understanding.

What's the research topic? Short DNA sequences from a standardized region of the genome provide a DNA barcode for identifying species. Compiling a public library of DNA barcodes linked to named specimens could provide a new master key for identifying species, one whose power will rise with increased taxon coverage and with faster, cheaper sequencing.

What previous work has been done? Recent work suggests that sequence diversity in a 648-base pair region of the mitochondrial gene, cytochrome c oxidase I (COI), might serve as a DNA barcode for the identification of animal species.

What did this study do? This study tested the effectiveness of a COI barcode in discriminating bird species, one of the largest and best-studied vertebrate groups.

What were the results? We determined COI barcodes for 260 species of North American birds and found that distinguishing species was generally straightforward. All species had a different COI barcode(s), and the differences between closely related species were, on average, 18 times higher than the differences within species. Our results identified four probable new species of North American birds, suggesting that a global survey will lead to the recognition of many additional bird species. The finding of large COI sequence differences between, as compared to small differences within, species confirms the effectiveness of COI barcodes for the identification of bird species.

What are the implications of this sudy? This result plus those from other groups of animals imply that a standard screening threshold of sequence difference (10× average intraspecific difference) could speed the discovery of new animal species. The growing evidence for the effectiveness of DNA barcodes as a basis for species identification supports an international exercise that has recently begun to assemble a comprehensive library of COI sequences linked to named specimens.

Your turn...

  • What was the purpose of this research?
  • What are the implications of the study?
  • What future research could be done on this same topic?

Original Research Source

Citation: Hebert PDN 1, Stoeckle MY 2, Zemlak TS 1, Francis CM 3 (2004) Identification of Birds through DNA Barcodes. PLoS Biol 2(10): e312.

1 Department of Zoology, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada, 2 Program for the Human Environment, Rockefeller University, New York, New York, United States of America, 3 National Wildlife Research Centre, Canadian Wildlife Service, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0020312

Copyright: © 2004 Hebert et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Content actions

Give Feedback:

E-mail the module author | Rate module ( How does the rating system work?)

Rating system

Ratings

Ratings allow you to judge the quality of modules. If other users have ranked the module then its average rating is displayed below. Ratings are calculated on a scale from one star (Poor) to five stars (Excellent).

How to rate a module

Hover over the star that corresponds to the rating you wish to assign. Click on the star to add your rating. Your rating should be based on the quality of the content. You must have an account and be logged in to rate content.

(0 ratings)

Download:

Add module to:

My Favorites (?)

'My Favorites' is a special kind of lens which you can use to bookmark modules and collections directly in Connexions. 'My Favorites' can only be seen by you, and collections saved in 'My Favorites' can remember the last module you were on. You need a Connexions account to use 'My Favorites'.

| A lens (?)

Definition of a lens

Lenses

A lens is a custom view of Connexions content. You can think of it as a fancy kind of list that will let you see Connexions through the eyes of organizations and people you trust.

What is in a lens?

Lens makers point to Connexions materials (modules and collections), creating a guide that includes their own comments and descriptive tags about the content.

Who can create a lens?

Any individual Connexions member, a community, or a respected organization.

What are tags? tag icon

Tags are descriptors added by lens makers to help label content, attaching a vocabulary that is meaningful in the context of the lens.

| External bookmarks