<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE document PUBLIC "-//CNX//DTD CNXML 0.5 plus MathML//EN" "http://cnx.rice.edu/cnxml/0.5/DTD/cnxml_mathml.dtd">
<document xmlns="http://cnx.rice.edu/cnxml" xmlns:md="http://cnx.rice.edu/mdml/0.4" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:bib="http://bibtexml.sf.net/" id="None">
  <name>CSLS Workshop on Computational Vision and Image Analysis</name>
  <metadata>
  <md:version>1.10</md:version>
  <md:created>2005/03/25 00:49:43 US/Central</md:created>
  <md:revised>2005/04/01 16:52:07.315 US/Central</md:revised>
  <md:authorlist>
      <md:author id="vontobel">
      <md:firstname>Pascal</md:firstname>
      <md:othername>Olivier</md:othername>
      <md:surname>Vontobel</md:surname>
      <md:email>vontobel@ece.wisc.edu</md:email>
    </md:author>
  </md:authorlist>

  <md:maintainerlist>
    <md:maintainer id="vontobel">
      <md:firstname>Pascal</md:firstname>
      <md:othername>Olivier</md:othername>
      <md:surname>Vontobel</md:surname>
      <md:email>vontobel@ece.wisc.edu</md:email>
    </md:maintainer>
  </md:maintainerlist>
  
  <md:keywordlist>
    <md:keyword>computational vision</md:keyword>
    <md:keyword>image analysis</md:keyword>
  </md:keywordlist>

  <md:abstract/>
</metadata>

  <content>

    <section id="overview">
      <name>
        Workshop Overview
      </name>

      <para id="abstract">

        Great advances have been made in the acquisition of image data, from
        conventional photography, CT scanning, and satellite imaging to the
        now ubiquitous digital cameras embedded in cell phones and other
        wireless devices. Although the semantic understanding of the shapes
        and other objects appearing in images is effortless for human beings,
        the corresponding problem in machine perception - namely, automatic
        interpretation via computer programs - remains a major open challenge
        in modern science. In fact, there are very few systems whose value
        derives from the analysis rather than collection of image data, and
        this "semantic gap" impedes scientific and technological advances in
        many areas, including automated medical diagnosis, robotics,
        industrial automation, and effective security and surveillance.

        In this CSLS Workshop, three distinguished experts in the field of
        Computational Vision and Image Analysis share their thoughts on the
        current state of the art and future directions in the field.

      </para>

      <list id="talks">

        <item>
          Go to the talk on
          <link src="#geman_title">
            Hierarchical Designs for Pattern Recognition</link>
          (by Prof. Donald Geman)
        </item>
      
        <item>
          Go to the talk on
          <link src="#soatto_title">
            Modeling and Inference of Dynamic Visual Processes</link>
          (by Prof. Stefano Soatto)
        </item>
  
        <item>
          Go to the talk on
          <link src="#miller_title">
            Computational Anatomy and Models for Image Analysis</link>
            (by Prof. Michael Miller)
        </item>

      </list>

      <para id="remark">
        Remark: This workshop was held on October 30, 2003 as part of the
        <link src="http://cnx.rice.edu/content/col10277/latest/">
          Computational Sciences Lecture Series (CSLS)</link>
        at the University of Wisconsin-Madison.
      </para>


    </section>


    <section id="geman_title">

      <name>
        Hierarchical Designs for Pattern Recognition
      </name>

      <para id="geman_affiliation">
        By
        <link src="http://www.cis.jhu.edu/people/faculty/geman/">
          Prof. Donald Geman</link>
        (Dept. of Applied Mathematics and Statistics and
         Center for Imaging Science,
         Johns Hopkins University,
         USA)
      </para>

      <para id="geman_media">
        <link src="geman_csls_031030.pdf">
          Slides of talk [PDF]</link>
        (Not yet available.)
        |
        <link src="mms://www.cae.wisc.edu/video/ece/CSLS/CSLS1.wmv">
          Video [WMV]</link>
        |
        <link src="http://www.cae.wisc.edu/~vontobel/csls_video1.mpg">
          Video [MPG]</link>
      </para>

      <para id="geman_abstract">

        ABSTRACT: It is unlikely that complex problems in machine perception,
        such as scene interpretation, will yield directly to improved methods
        of statistical learning. Some organizational framework is needed to
        confront the small amount of data relative to the large number of
        possible explanations, and to make sure that intensive computation is
        restricted to genuinely ambiguous regions. As an example, I will
        present a "twenty questions" approach to pattern recognition. The
        object of analysis is the computational process itself rather than
        probability distributions (Bayesian inference) or decision boundaries
        (statistical learning). Under mild assumptions, optimal strategies
        exhibit a steady progression from broad scope coupled with low power
        to high power coupled with dedication to specific
        explanations. Several theoretical results will be mentioned (joint
        work with Gilles Blanchard) as well as experiments in object detection
        (joint work with Yali Amit and Francois Fleuret).

      </para>

    </section>

    <section id="soatto_title">
      <name>
        Modeling and Inference of Dynamic Visual Processes
      </name>

      <para id="soatto_affiliation">
        By
        <link src="http://www.cs.ucla.edu/%7Esoatto">
          Prof. Stefano Soatto</link>
        (Department of Computer Science,
         University of California Los Angeles,
         USA)
      </para>

      <para id="soatto_media">
        <link src="soatto_csls_031030.pdf">
          Slides of talk [PDF]</link>
        (Not yet available.)
        |
        <link src="mms://www.cae.wisc.edu/video/ece/CSLS/CSLS2.wmv">
          Video [WMV]</link>
      </para>

      <para id="soatto_abstract">      

        ABSTRACT: "We see in order to move, and we move in order to see." In
        this expository talk, I will explore the role of vision as a sensor
        for interaction with physical space. Since the complexity of the
        physical world is far superior to that of its measured images,
        inferring a generic representation of the scene is an intrinsically
        ill-posed problem. However, the task becomes well-posed within the
        context of a specific control task. I will display recent results in
        the inference of dynamical models of visual scenes for the purpose of
        motion control, shape visualization, rendering, and classification.

      </para>

    </section>

    <section id="miller_title">

      <name>
        Computational Anatomy and Models for Image Analysis
      </name>

      <para id="miller_affiliation">
        By
        <link src="http://www.cis.jhu.edu/people/faculty/mim/">
          Prof. Michael Miller</link>
        (Director of the Center for Imaging Science,
         The Seder Professor of Biomedical Engineering,
         Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering,
         Johns Hopkins University,
         USA)
      </para>

      <para id="miller_media">
        <link src="miller_csls_031030.pdf">
          Slides of talk [PDF]</link>
        (Not yet available.)
        |
        <link src="mms://www.cae.wisc.edu/video/ece/CSLS/CSLS3.wmv">
          Video [WMV]</link>
      </para>

      <para id="miller_abstract">

        ABSTRACT: University Recent years have seen rapid advances in the
        mathematical specification of models for image analysis of human
        anatomy. As first described in "Computational Anatomy: An Emerging
        Discipline" (Grenander and Miller, Quarterly of Applied Mathematics,
        Vol. 56, 617-694, 1998), human anatomy is modelled as a deformable
        template, an orbit under the group action of infinite dimensional
        diffeomorphisms. In this talk, we will describe recent advances in CA,
        specifying a metric on the ensemble of images, and examine distances
        between elements of the orbits, "Group Actions, Homeomorphisms, and
        Matching: A General Framework" (Miller and Younes,
        Int. J. Comp. Vision Vol. 41, 61-84, 2001), "On the Metrics of
        Euler-Lagrange Equations of Computational Anatomy
        (Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng., Vol. 4, 375-405, 2002). Numerous results
        will be shown comparing shapes through this metric formulation of the
        deformable template, including results from disease testing on the
        hippocampus, and cortical structural and functional mapping.

      </para>

    </section>

  </content>
  
</document>
