Diffraction is an important characteristic of waves. It can be said to one of
the defining characteristics of a wave. It occurs when part of a wavefront is
obstructed. The parts of the wavefronts that propagate past the the obstacle
interfere and create a diffraction pattern. Diffraction and interference are
essentially the same physical process, resulting from the vector addition of
fields from different sources. By convention interference refers to only a few
sources and diffraction refers to many sources or a continuous
source.
When a plane wave hits an aperture, Huygens principle says that each point in
the aperture acts as a source of spherical wavelets. The maximum path length
difference of all these sources is between the top and the bottom.
Δ
r
m
a
x
=
a
sin
θ
Δ
r
m
a
x
=
a
sin
θ
The
waves start out in phase. If
a
<
<
λ
a
<
<
λ
then the slit acts as a point source and you get a spherical wave coming out.
If
a
>
>
λ
a
>
>
λ
then the aperture simply casts a bright spot the size of the aperture shadow.
But if
λ
≈
a
λ
≈
a
then an interference pattern is set up.When the resulting pattern is viewed
close to the aperture, the pattern can be very complex, and this is call
Fresnel diffraction. As the the pattern is viewed from further and further
away, it eventually stops changing shape and only grows in size. This is
Fraunhoffer diffraction.
Consider the contribution to the field
E
⃗
E
⃗
at a P due to a small element of the slit
ⅆ
y
ⅆ
y
at
y
y
.
It is a distance
r
r
from P.
R
R
is the distance from the center of the slit to P.
lets define
ε
L
ε
L
which is the source strength per unit length, which is a constant.
then
d
E
=
ε
L
r
ⅆ
y
e
i
(
k
r
−
ω
t
)
d
E
=
ε
L
r
ⅆ
y
e
i
(
k
r
−
ω
t
)
Now from the drawing
r
2
=
(
R
−
y
sin
θ
)
2
+
(
y
cos
θ
)
2
=
R
2
+
y
2
sin
2
θ
−
2
R
y
sin
θ
+
y
2
cos
2
θ
=
R
2
+
y
2
−
2
R
y
sin
θ
=
R
2
[
1
−
2
y
R
sin
θ
+
y
2
R
2
]
r
2
=
(
R
−
y
sin
θ
)
2
+
(
y
cos
θ
)
2
=
R
2
+
y
2
sin
2
θ
−
2
R
y
sin
θ
+
y
2
cos
2
θ
=
R
2
+
y
2
−
2
R
y
sin
θ
=
R
2
[
1
−
2
y
R
sin
θ
+
y
2
R
2
]
Now assume that
y
<
<
R
y
<
<
R
(which gives us the Franhaufer condition) and
r
=
R
[
1
−
2
y
R
sin
θ
]
1
2
r
=
R
[
1
−
2
y
R
sin
θ
]
1
2
now expand the square root
r
=
R
[
1
−
y
R
sin
θ
+
…
]
r
=
R
[
1
−
y
R
sin
θ
+
…
]
and neglect higher terms so that
r
=
R
−
y
sin
θ
r
=
R
−
y
sin
θ
thus
d
E
=
ε
L
R
e
i
(
k
(
R
−
y
sin
θ
)
−
ω
t
)
ⅆ
y
d
E
=
ε
L
R
e
i
(
k
(
R
−
y
sin
θ
)
−
ω
t
)
ⅆ
y
where now we have used R in the denominator since it is much bigger than y
d
E
=
ε
L
R
e
i
(
k
R
−
ω
t
)
e
−
i
k
y
sin
θ
ⅆ
y
d
E
=
ε
L
R
e
i
(
k
R
−
ω
t
)
e
−
i
k
y
sin
θ
ⅆ
y
now integrate assuming that
θ
θ
is a constant over the slit
E
=
ε
L
R
e
i
(
k
R
−
ω
t
)
∫
−
a
/
2
a
/
2
e
−
i
k
y
sin
θ
ⅆ
y
=
ε
L
R
e
i
(
k
R
−
ω
t
)
e
−
i
k
y
sin
θ
−
i
k
sin
θ
|
−
a
/
2
a
/
2
=
ε
L
R
e
i
(
k
R
−
ω
t
)
e
−
i
k
a
2
sin
θ
−
e
i
k
a
2
sin
θ
−
i
k
sin
θ
=
ε
L
R
e
i
(
k
R
−
ω
t
)
−
2
i
sin
(
k
a
2
sin
θ
)
−
i
k
sin
θ
=
ε
L
R
e
i
(
k
R
−
ω
t
)
2
sin
(
k
a
2
sin
θ
)
k
sin
θ
=
ε
L
a
R
e
i
(
k
R
−
ω
t
)
sin
(
k
a
2
sin
θ
)
k
a
2
sin
θ
E
=
ε
L
R
e
i
(
k
R
−
ω
t
)
∫
−
a
/
2
a
/
2
e
−
i
k
y
sin
θ
ⅆ
y
=
ε
L
R
e
i
(
k
R
−
ω
t
)
e
−
i
k
y
sin
θ
−
i
k
sin
θ
|
−
a
/
2
a
/
2
=
ε
L
R
e
i
(
k
R
−
ω
t
)
e
−
i
k
a
2
sin
θ
−
e
i
k
a
2
sin
θ
−
i
k
sin
θ
=
ε
L
R
e
i
(
k
R
−
ω
t
)
−
2
i
sin
(
k
a
2
sin
θ
)
−
i
k
sin
θ
=
ε
L
R
e
i
(
k
R
−
ω
t
)
2
sin
(
k
a
2
sin
θ
)
k
sin
θ
=
ε
L
a
R
e
i
(
k
R
−
ω
t
)
sin
(
k
a
2
sin
θ
)
k
a
2
sin
θ
now we define
β
=
k
a
2
sin
θ
β
=
k
a
2
sin
θ
and see that we can rewrite our expression as
E
=
ε
L
a
R
sin
β
β
e
i
(
k
R
−
ω
t
)
E
=
ε
L
a
R
sin
β
β
e
i
(
k
R
−
ω
t
)
or equivalently
E
=
ε
L
a
R
s
i
n
c
β
e
i
(
k
R
−
ω
t
)
E
=
ε
L
a
R
s
i
n
c
β
e
i
(
k
R
−
ω
t
)
The intensity will go like the square of this so
I
=
I
0
s
i
n
c
2
β
I
=
I
0
s
i
n
c
2
β
Plot of
sin
2
β
β
2
sin
2
β
β
2
The Intensity has a maximum at
β
=
0
β
=
0
or
θ
=
0
θ
=
0
.
there are minima when
sin
β
=
0
sin
β
=
0
or
β
=
k
a
2
sin
θ
=
n
π
β
=
k
a
2
sin
θ
=
n
π
2
π
λ
a
2
sin
θ
=
n
π
2
π
λ
a
2
sin
θ
=
n
π
sin
θ
=
n
λ
a
sin
θ
=
n
λ
a
in the case of small
θ
θ
we see that
Δ
θ
=
λ
a
Δ
θ
=
λ
a
is the distance between adjacent minima.
As
a
a
becomes large, we see that the minima will merge together. This is consistent
with what we said at the beginning, that if
a
>
>
λ
a
>
>
λ
then you just get shadowing but not diffraction.
Finding the secondary maxima is more difficult. (Take the derivative of I and
then look for zeros.) This can not be done analytically.
Note that wee have been considering only one dimension. If the length of the
slit is
L
L
then we have only considered the case that
L
>
>
λ
L
>
>
λ
and so diffraction occurs only in the other dimension.