Skip to content Skip to navigation

Connexions

You are here: Home » Content » Conclusions and References

Navigation

Content Actions

  • Download module PDF
  • Add to ...
    Add the module to:
    • My Favorites
    • A lens
    • An external social bookmarking service
    • My Favorites (What is 'My Favorites'?)
      'My Favorites' is a special kind of lens which you can use to bookmark modules and collections directly in Connexions. 'My Favorites' can only be seen by you, and collections saved in 'My Favorites' can remember the last module you were on. You need a Connexions account to use 'My Favorites'.
    • A lens (What is a lens?)

      Definition of a lens

      Lenses

      A lens is a custom view of Connexions content. You can think of it as a fancy kind of list that will let you see Connexions through the eyes of organizations and people you trust.

      What is in a lens?

      Lens makers point to Connexions materials (modules and collections), creating a guide that includes their own comments and descriptive tags about the content.

      Who can create a lens?

      Any individual Connexions member, a community, or a respected organization.

    • External bookmarks
  • E-mail the authors

Lenses

What is a lens?

Definition of a lens

Lenses

A lens is a custom view of Connexions content. You can think of it as a fancy kind of list that will let you see Connexions through the eyes of organizations and people you trust.

What is in a lens?

Lens makers point to Connexions materials (modules and collections), creating a guide that includes their own comments and descriptive tags about the content.

Who can create a lens?

Any individual Connexions member, a community, or a respected organization.

This content is ...

Affiliated with (What does "Affiliated with" mean?)

This content is either by members of the organizations listed or about topics related to the organizations listed. Click each link to see a list of all content affiliated with the organization.
  • Rice University ELEC 301 Projects

    This module is included inLens: Rice University ELEC 301 Project Lens
    By: Rice University ELEC 301As a part of collection:"ELEC 301 Projects Fall 2005"

    Click the "Rice University ELEC 301 Projects" link to see all content affiliated with them.

Recently Viewed

This feature requires Javascript to be enabled.

Conclusions and References

Module by: Deborah Miller, Warren Scott

Conclusions

Using the terahertz reflected waveforms, we were able to measure the projections and reconstruct the original image. This process was completed in two steps. In the first, inverse and Wiener filtering were used to deconvolve the data from the reference pulse to obtain the actual projections of the test object. In the second, the Filtered Backprojection Algorithm featuring the Fourier Slice Theorem was used to filter the projections using a ramp filter and backproject the result over the image plane, thus reconstructing the image of the object.

As far as the deconvolution part of the project concerns, the regularized inverse filter gives better results than Wiener filtering, as already pointed out. Care should be exercised when picking the regularized parameter γ, so as not to increase the noise level of the resulting signal. Usually, this is a case-dependent procedure that takes numerical experimentation. It should be noted that the original data at hand were of very good quality with low noise level. Thus the results of Wiener filtering were worse than those obtained by inverse filtering.

For the reconstruction part, it was found that the number of projection angles used was vital to the clarity of the final image. We were able to greatly downsample the data and still maintain image quality to a certain point. Due to the size of the data, the algorithms ran for minutes.

Future Work

Much potential for future improvement and implementation is possible using this method of computerized tomography. Advanced deconvolution methods featuring wavelets for efficient noise reduction can be used for isolating the projections out of the measured waveforms. Furthermore, it seems reasonable to cut-off the first part of each measured waveform since it only contains noise and no useful information for the image reconstruction. This can be accomplished by appropriately windowing the raw measurements before any other manipulations takes place. Due to the linear nature of the process, different algorithm code could have been written to start reconstructing the image immediately after the first projection had been calculated. This and other efficiency tools could be implemented to greatly increase the speed of the overall reconstruction, making the process applicable for real-time use.

References

J. Pearce, H. Choi, D. M. Mittleman, J. White, and D. Zimdars, Opt. Lett. 30, 1653 (2005).

A. C. Kak and M. Slaney, Principles of Computerized Tomographic Imaging (IEEE Press, 1988).

J. S. Lim, Two- Dimensional Signal and Image Processing (Prentice- Hall Inc., 1990).

D. M. Mittleman, S. Hunsche, L. Bovin, and M. C. Nuss, Opt. Lett. 22, 904 (1997).

B. B. Hu and M. C. Nuss, Opt. Lett., 20, 1716 (1995).

Comments, questions, feedback, criticisms?

Send feedback