Skip to content Skip to navigation

Connexions

You are here: Home » Content » TEST OF THE EQUALITY OF TWO INDEPENDENT NORMAL DISTRIBUTIONS

Navigation

Recently Viewed

This feature requires Javascript to be enabled.

TEST OF THE EQUALITY OF TWO INDEPENDENT NORMAL DISTRIBUTIONS

Module by: Ewa Paszek. E-mail the author

User rating (How does the rating system work?)
Ratings

Ratings allow you to judge the quality of modules. If other users have ranked the module then its average rating is displayed below. Ratings are calculated on a scale from one star (Poor) to five stars (Excellent).

How to rate a module

Hover over the star that corresponds to the rating you wish to assign. Click on the star to add your rating. Your rating should be based on the quality of the content. You must have an account and be logged in to rate content.

:
(0 ratings)

Summary: This course is a short series of lectures on Introductory Statistics. Topics covered are listed in the Table of Contents. The notes were prepared by Ewa Paszek and Marek Kimmel. The development of this course has been supported by NSF 0203396 grant.

Note: Your browser may not currently support MathML. See our browser support page for additional details. You can always view the correct math in the PDF version.

TEST OF THE EQUALITY OF TWO INDEPENDENT NORMAL DISTRIBUTIONS

Let X and Y have independent normal distributions N( μ x , σ x 2 ) N( μ x , σ x 2 ) and N( μ y , σ y 2 ) N( μ y , σ y 2 ) , respectively. There are times when we are interested in testing whether the distribution of X and Y are the same. So if the assumption of normality is valid, we would be interested in testing whether the two variances are equal and whether the two mean are equal.

Let first consider a test of the equality of the two means. When X and Y are independent and normally distributed, we can test hypotheses about their means using the same t-statistic that was used previously. Recall that the t-statistic used for constructing the confidence interval assumed that the variances of X and Y are equal. That is why we shall later consider a test for the equality of two variances.

Let start with an example and then let give a table that lists some hypotheses and critical regions.

Example 1

A botanist is interested in comparing the growth response of dwarf pea stems to two different levels of the hormone indoeacetic acid (IAA). Using 16-day-old pea plants, the botanist obtains 5-millimeter sections and floats these sections with different hormone concentrations to observe the effect of the hormone on the growth of the pea stem.

Let X and Y denote, respectively, the independent growths that can be attributed to the hormone during the first 26 hours after sectioning for ( 0.5 ) ( 10 ) 4 ( 0.5 ) ( 10 ) 4 and ( 10 ) 4 ( 10 ) 4 levels of concentration of IAA. The botanist would like to test the null hypothesis H 0 : μ x μ y =0 H 0 : μ x μ y =0 against the alternative hypothesis H 1 : μ x μ y <0 H 1 : μ x μ y <0 . If we can assume X and Y are independent and normally distributed with common variance, respective random samples of size n and m give a test based on the statistic

T= X ¯ Y ¯ { [ ( n1 ) S x 2 +( m1 ) S Yy 2 ]/( n+m2 ) }( 1/n+1/m ) = X ¯ Y ¯ S P 1/n+1/m , T= X ¯ Y ¯ { [ ( n1 ) S x 2 +( m1 ) S Yy 2 ]/( n+m2 ) }( 1/n+1/m ) = X ¯ Y ¯ S P 1/n+1/m ,

where S P = ( n1 ) S X 2 +( m1 ) S Y 2 n+m2 . S P = ( n1 ) S X 2 +( m1 ) S Y 2 n+m2 .

T has a t distribution with r=n+m2 r=n+m2 degrees of freedom when H 0 H 0 is true and the variances are (approximately) equal. The hypothesis Ho will be rejected in favor of H 1 H 1 if the observed value of T is less than t α ( n+m2 ) t α ( n+m2 ) .

Example 2

In the example 1, the botanist measured the growths of pea stem segments, in millimeters, for n=11 observations of X given in the Table 1:

Table 1: Table 1
0.8 1.8 1.0 0.1 0.9 1.7 1.0 1.4 0.9 1.2 0.5

and m=13 observations of Y given in the Table 2:

Table 2: Table 2
1.0 0.8 1.6 2.6 1.3 1.1 2.4 1.8 2.5 1.4 1.9 2.0 1.2

For these data, x ¯ =1.03, s x 2 =0.24, y ¯ =1.66, x ¯ =1.03, s x 2 =0.24, y ¯ =1.66, and s y 2 =0.35 s y 2 =0.35 . The critical region for testing H 0 : μ x μ y =0 H 0 : μ x μ y =0 against H 1 : μ x μ y <0 H 1 : μ x μ y <0 is t t 0.05 ( 22 )=1.717 t t 0.05 ( 22 )=1.717 . Since H 0 H 0 is clearly rejected at α α =0.05 significance level.

Notice that:

an approximate p-value of this test is 0.005 because t 0.05 ( 22 )=2.819 t 0.05 ( 22 )=2.819 . Also, the sample variances do not differ too much; thus most statisticians would use this two sample t-test.

Content actions

Give Feedback:

E-mail the module author | Rate module ( How does the rating system work?)

Rating system

Ratings

Ratings allow you to judge the quality of modules. If other users have ranked the module then its average rating is displayed below. Ratings are calculated on a scale from one star (Poor) to five stars (Excellent).

How to rate a module

Hover over the star that corresponds to the rating you wish to assign. Click on the star to add your rating. Your rating should be based on the quality of the content. You must have an account and be logged in to rate content.

(0 ratings)

Download:

Add module to:

My Favorites (?)

'My Favorites' is a special kind of lens which you can use to bookmark modules and collections directly in Connexions. 'My Favorites' can only be seen by you, and collections saved in 'My Favorites' can remember the last module you were on. You need a Connexions account to use 'My Favorites'.

| A lens (?)

Definition of a lens

Lenses

A lens is a custom view of Connexions content. You can think of it as a fancy kind of list that will let you see Connexions through the eyes of organizations and people you trust.

What is in a lens?

Lens makers point to Connexions materials (modules and collections), creating a guide that includes their own comments and descriptive tags about the content.

Who can create a lens?

Any individual Connexions member, a community, or a respected organization.

What are tags? tag icon

Tags are descriptors added by lens makers to help label content, attaching a vocabulary that is meaningful in the context of the lens.

| External bookmarks