Skip to content Skip to navigation

Connexions

You are here: Home » Content » Collection coverage

Navigation

Recently Viewed

This feature requires Javascript to be enabled.

Collection coverage

Module by: Joseph Grimes. E-mail the author

User rating (How does the rating system work?)
Ratings

Ratings allow you to judge the quality of modules. If other users have ranked the module then its average rating is displayed below. Ratings are calculated on a scale from one star (Poor) to five stars (Excellent).

How to rate a module

Hover over the star that corresponds to the rating you wish to assign. Click on the star to add your rating. Your rating should be based on the quality of the content. You must have an account and be logged in to rate content.

:
(0 ratings)

Summary: The geographic location of the languages being studied may or may not match their linguistic relationships. So we need to know where they are.

Figure 1: Geographic distribution of languages included in JG-SulSel12, from the Collection panel.
Figure 1 (Coll-Geog.jpg)

Geography is a factor in comparative linguistics. Some languages are spread all over the world. Others are used only in one valley on a small island. Language boundaries may or may not coincide with political or geographic boundaries at any level.

Back in the days when comparing even a couple of dozen languages was a lifetime task, because everything had to be done by hand, there was a temptation to classify the intermediate levels of the language family tree by geography. So one sees references to languages of Borneo, or Formosan languages, or languages of the Grassfields, in the comparative linguistic literature. And it is true that there are places where linguistically close varieties live next to each other and linguistically distant varieties don’t.

But finding that a geographic region contains a single family of languages ought to be a conclusion of comparative research, not a premise. The geographic aggregation of languages may or may not match linguistic history; it is always suspect until we’ve done the actual comparison. But we still want to know where the languages are spoken.

Content actions

Give Feedback:

E-mail the module author | Rate module ( How does the rating system work?)

Rating system

Ratings

Ratings allow you to judge the quality of modules. If other users have ranked the module then its average rating is displayed below. Ratings are calculated on a scale from one star (Poor) to five stars (Excellent).

How to rate a module

Hover over the star that corresponds to the rating you wish to assign. Click on the star to add your rating. Your rating should be based on the quality of the content. You must have an account and be logged in to rate content.

(0 ratings)

Download:

Add module to:

My Favorites (?)

'My Favorites' is a special kind of lens which you can use to bookmark modules and collections directly in Connexions. 'My Favorites' can only be seen by you, and collections saved in 'My Favorites' can remember the last module you were on. You need a Connexions account to use 'My Favorites'.

| A lens (?)

Definition of a lens

Lenses

A lens is a custom view of Connexions content. You can think of it as a fancy kind of list that will let you see Connexions through the eyes of organizations and people you trust.

What is in a lens?

Lens makers point to Connexions materials (modules and collections), creating a guide that includes their own comments and descriptive tags about the content.

Who can create a lens?

Any individual Connexions member, a community, or a respected organization.

What are tags? tag icon

Tags are descriptors added by lens makers to help label content, attaching a vocabulary that is meaningful in the context of the lens.

| External bookmarks