Summary: Each particle of the body follows a circular path about axis in rotational motion.
Nature displays varieties of motion. Most of the time, we encounter motion, which is composed of different basic forms of motion. The most important challenge in the study of motion is to establish a clear understanding of the components (types) of motion that ultimately manifests in the world around us. Translational motion is the basic form. It represents the basic or inherent property of natural objects. However, what we see around is not what is fundamental to the matter (straight line motion), but something which is grossly modified by the presence of force. This is the reason planets move around the Sun; electrons orbit about nucleus and aeroplanes circle the Earth on inter-continental flight.
Variety of motion is one important aspect of the study of motion. Another important aspect is the restrictive paradigm of fundamental laws that needs to be expanded to real time bodies and objects. For example, Newton's laws of motion are restricted to particle or particle like bodies. Now, the big question is whether Newtonian dynamics is capable to describe real time situation? The answer is yes. But, it needs further development that addresses issues like rotation and rigid bodies.
Rotational dynamics is an important step towards the study of real time motion. We seek to study the cause and effect relationship for the rotational motion. However, before we proceed let us recapitulate motion types and associated terminologies. This will enable us to clearly understand the domain of different motion types, as we proceed to study more complex motions like rotation, rolling and angular motion etc.
Following description is a brief of motion types and associated terms :
1: Particle
It is a hypothetical object construct occupying a single coordinate point. All mass is concentrated at that point.
2: Particle like objects
All particles composing the object under go same motion (parallel trajectories, same velocity and acceleration).
3: Extended or rigid bodies
The bodies, which are not a particle, are extended bodies. The important feature of rigid body is that mass distribution does not change with motion. Different parts of the body are locked or fixed with respect to other parts.
4: Pure translational motion
It is a motion along a straight line. We must note that motion such as projectile motion under gravity is not a pure translational motion. In general, we drop the prefix "pure" and refer it by the term "translation" alone. The idea is that if we have to refer "impure" translation, we shall qualify the same.
5: Translational kinematics
The description of motion in translation forms the subject of translational kinematics. In case of rigid or extended objects, kinematics describes motion of "center of mass" instead of individual particles or particle like objects. This study also covers translation, which are strictly not pure translational i.e. we also study translation along non-linear paths.
6: Translational dynamics
The study of cause and effect for translational motion constitutes the subject here. The Laws of motion as applied directly is valid for a particle or particle like objects only. Translational motion of a system of particles or rigid bodies is studied in conjunction with the concept of "center of mass". The law of motion, in this case, is applied not on individual particles, but on the "center of mass" of the rigid bodies.
7: Pure rotational motion
It is a motion of a particle or rigid body about a fixed axis. Each particle of the rigid body moves along a circular path. A central force called centripetal force is the requirement of rotational motion. Each of the particle constituting the body under go circular motion with same angular velocity and acceleration. Like in the case of translation, we may choose to drop the prefix "pure" and refer this motion simply by the term "rotation".
| Pure rotational motion |
|---|
![]() |
8: Rotational kinematics
The description of motion in rotation about a fixed axis forms the subject of rotational kinematics. If a rigid body is involved, then the mass distribution of the body should not change during rotation.
9: Rotational dynamics
The study of cause and effect for rotational motion constitutes the subject here. This is the subject matter of the discussion in this module and modules following it. Here, we shall study rotation of a particle or particle like object and rigid body. Our discussion will start with answering questions such as what is the "cause" of rotation ?
A particle or a rigid body in rotation about a fixed axis should continue to rotate with the given angular velocity indefinitely unless obstructed externally. Like translational motion, however, angular velocity of rotation can be changed by external cause. In the case of translation motion, the external cause is "force". We have to investigate what is the equivalent cause in the case of rotational motion.
Let us consider a rigid block placed over a smooth horizontal surface as shown in the figure which is subjected to a force across one of its face. What is expected? The center of mass will move with linear acceleration following Newton's second law. However, the force is not passing through the center of mass. As such, the face of the block will also be turned in the direction shown. The resulting motion will be a composite motion constituting both translation and rotation.
| Composite motion |
|---|
![]() |
Let us now imagine if the body is pierced through in the middle by a vertical bar with some clearance. The vertical bar will inhibit translation and the block will only rotate about the vertical bar. The question is what caused the block to turn around? Indeed it is the force that caused the angular motion. However, it is not only the force that determined the outcome (magnitude and direction of angular velocity). There are other considerations as well.
| Rotational motion |
|---|
![]() |
We all have the experience of opening and closing a hinged door in our house. It takes lesser effort (force) to open the door when force is applied farther from the hinge. We can further reduce the effort by applying force normal to the plane of the door. On the other hand, we would require greater effort (force) if we push or pull the door from a point closer to the hinge. If we apply force in the radial direction (in the plane of door) towards the hinge, then the door does not rotate a bit - whatever be the magnitude of force. In the nutshell, rotation of the door depends on :
These factors, which cause rotation, are captured by a quantity known as torque, which is defined as :
where "r" is the position vector. There is a slight difficulty in interpreting this vector equation as applicable to rotation. The position vector,"r", as we can recall, is measured from a point. Now, the question is what is that point in the case of rotation about a fixed axis? Here, we observe that there is a unique point of application of the force. By the nature of motion, this point rotates in a plane perpendicular to the axis of rotation. We can, therefore, uniquely define the position of the point of application of force by measuring it from the point on the axis in that plane of rotation.
| Rotational motion |
|---|
![]() |
The force may be directed in any possible direction. However, the body rotates about a fixed axis. It is not allowed to rotate or move about any other axes. What it means that we are limited only to the component of torque along the axis of rotation. It, then, means that we are only interested to calculate component of torque about the axis of rotation.
We can implicitly ensure calculation of the component of torque in the direction of rotation, by ensuring to only consider the component of force which is perpendicular to the axis of rotation. In the figure below, we have tried to capture this aspect. We consider only the component of force in xy-plane while evaluating the vector torque equation.
| Rotational motion |
|---|
![]() |
In the nutshell, we interpret the vector product with two specific conditions :
Clearly, the plane of rotation of the point of application of force is perpendicular to the axis of rotation.
With the understandings as deliberated above, the magnitude of torque for rotation is given by :
| Torque |
|---|
![]() |
where "r","F" and "θ" are quantities measured in the plane perpendicular to the axis of rotation.
Torque can be evaluated in two other alternative ways :
The magnitude is equal to the product of the magnitude of position vector and component of force perpendicular to position vector. This is an important interpretation as it highlights that it is the tangential component (perpendicular to radial direction) of force, which is capable to produce change in the rotation. The component of force in the radial direction (F cosθ) does not affect rotation.
Also,
The magnitude is equal to the product of the perpendicular distance and magnitude of the force. Perpendicular distance is obtained by drawing a perpendicular on the extended line of application of force as shown in the figure below. We may note here that this line is perpendicular to both the axis of rotation and force. This perpendicular distance is also known as "moment arm" of the force and is denoted as "
| Torque |
|---|
![]() |
The nature of cross (or vector) product of two vectors, conveys a great deal about the direction of cross product i.e. torque in our case. It tells us that (i) torque vector is perpendicular to the plane formed by operand vectors i.e. "r" and "F" and (ii) torque vector is individually perpendicular to each of the operand vectors. Applying this explanation to the case in hand, we realize here that torque is perpendicular to the plane formed by radius and force vectors. Since this plane is defined by "xy" plane in the figure shown, the torque vector acts along z-axis. However, we do not know which side of the plane i.e +z or -z direction, the torque is directed.
| Direction of torque |
|---|
![]() |
We apply right hand rule to determine the remaining piece of information, regarding direction of torque. We have two options here. Either we can shift radius vector such that tails of two vectors meet at the position of particle or we can shift the force vector (parallel shifting) so that tails of two vectors meet at the axis. Second approach has the advantage that direction of torque vector along the axis also gives the sense of rotation about that axis. Thus, following the second approach, we shift the force vector parallely to the origin as shown here.
| Direction of torque |
|---|
![]() |
Now, the direction of rotation is obtained by applying rule of vector cross product. We place right hand with closed fingers such that the curl of fingers point in the direction as we transverse from the direction of position vector (first vector) to the force vector (second vector). Then, the direction of extended thumb points in the direction of torque. A counter clock-wise torque is positive, whereas clock-wise torque is negative. In this case, torque is counter-clockwise and is positive. Therefore, we conclude that torque is acting in +z-direction.
Pure rotation about a fixed axis gives us an incredible advantage in determining torque. We work with only two directions (positive and negative). In general, however, we can consider other directions of torque as well with different orientation of axis of rotation. It is worthy to note that torque follows the superposition principle. Mathematically, we can add torque vectors to obtain net or resultant torque. In words, it means that if a rigid body is subjected to more than one torque, then we can represent the torques by a single torque, which has the same effect on rotation.
Torque has the unit of Newton - meter.
The relation that connects external torque to the angular acceleration has the same form as that of translational motion. In translational motion, this relationship is given as :
Intuitively, we may conclude that relation between torque (cause) and angular acceleration (effect) should have the following form :
However, we shall find that the role of inertia is not represented by mass alone in rotation. As there are corresponding quantities for force and acceleration, there is also a separate corresponding term or quantity that represents inertia to rotation. This quantity is termed as "moment of inertia", represented by symbol, "I". The equivalent Newton's second law for rotation is, thus :
We can reinforce the idea that mass alone does not determine inertia to the external torque in rotation. Often we find that a change in the orientation of the axis or alternatively the change in the distribution of mass with respect to axis of rotation, changes the requirement of external torque to produce a given angular acceleration. To prove the point, let us consider a cylindrical body and its rotation about two different axes as shown in the figure.
| Rotation |
|---|
![]() |
It is found that it takes lesser torque to produce a given angular acceleration in the second case. In this case, mass distribution is closer to the axis than that in the first case and, therefore, presents lesser resistance to external torque.
We introduced torque and second law of motion in respect of a rigid body. This is actually an inverted sequence of study. We should have started with a particle and then should have extended the concept to the rigid body, which is an aggregation of particles with locked positions. We did this inversion purposely, because physical meaning of torque and rotation is best visualized in terms of rigid body.
For the rotation of a particle, we simulate a situation in which a particle like sphere of mass "m" is rotated by applying external force. We consider a particle of mass "m" attached to one end of a mass-less (it is a mere theoretical consideration) rod of length "r". The other hand of the rod is hinged at "O" such that the particle can be rotated in a horizontal plane about a vertical axis passing through center of circle, "O" .
| Rotation |
|---|
![]() |
Now let us consider that a force "F" is applied to the particle in the plane of the circular path as shown in the figure. The radial component does not produce any acceleration as the rod is hinged at "O". The tangential component of force produces tangential acceleration,
On the other hand, torque on the particle is :
But we know that tangential acceleration is related to angular acceleration as :
Substituting in the expression of torque, we have :
where
Problem : A particle of mass 0.1 kg attached to a light rod that rotates about an axis at a perpendicular distance of 1 m. If the angular speed of the particle is 60 rpm, find the constant torque that can stop the rotation of the particle in one minute.
Solution : The idea here is to apply Newton's second law of rotation for a particle. For this, we need to find angular deceleration.
In order to find angular deceleration, we first convert angular velocity in rad/s :
Since torque "τ" is constant as given in the question, this is obviously the case of uniform deceleration. As such, we can apply equation of rotational motion for constant acceleration,
Here,
Putting values in the equation of motion, we have :
Now, applying Newton's second law of motion for rotation,
Here,
Dropping the sign of deceleration and putting values in the expression of torque, we have the magnitude of torque :
1. The particles in a rigid body are locked and are placed at fixed linear distances from others.
2. Each particle constituting a rigid body executes circular motion about a fixed axis in pure rotation.
3. The cause of change in angular velocity in rotation is torque. It is defined as :
where position vector,"r", and the force vector," (F)" are in the plane of rotation of the point of application of force, which is perpendicular to the axis.
4. The magnitude of torque
The magnitude of torque is determined in three equivalent ways :
(i) In terms of angle between position vector (r) and force (F)
(ii) In terms of tangential component of force (
(iii) In terms of moment arm (
4. Direction of torque
The vector equation of torque reveals that torque is perpendicular to the plane formed by position and force vectors and is also perpendicular to each of them individually. In order to know the sign of torque (positive for anticlockwise and negative for clockwise rotation), we apply right hand rule.
5. Newton’s second law of motion in angular form for a rotating rigid body
It is given as :
6. Newton’s second law of motion in angular form for a rotating particle
It is given as :
where I is
7. Rotation about an axis can be analyzed in terms of a simplified vector notation format. Since only two directions are involved, we can use Newton’s second law of motion for rotation in terms of equivalent scalar angular quantities with appropriate sign : positive for anticlockwise rotation and negative for clockwise rotation.