Friction has presence everywhere in our day to day life. It is important to understand how friction affects a rolling motion. A pure rolling disk with constant velocity does not slide on the surface. In this case, there is no tendency of the rolling disk to slide on the surface in contact. Ideally, there is only a point contact with the surface underneath. As such, there is no friction between surfaces.
Absence of friction for rolling at constant velocity has a very significant implication as a disk in pure rolling shall move indefinitely if no other force is acting. This is a slightly unrealistic deduction for we know that all rolling disk is brought to rest ultimately unless external force is applied to maintain the speed. This needs explanation.
As a matter of fact, it is not possible to realize an ideal pure rolling in the first place. All rolling motion in our real world involves contact which spreads beyond a point and there is some amount of sliding involved and therefore some amount of friction is also present to decelerate the rolling. Nevertheless, friction of rolling is comparatively much smaller. This is the reason that all transportation modes (car, rail etc.) on the surface are almost always designed to have rolling wheels.
When external force is applied, it changes the linear and angular velocities in accordance with the relative direction of external force (in the direction of motion or opposite to it). The disk begins to move either faster or slower. If the disk still rolls without sliding, then it is not possible that there is an increase in one component, say linear velocity, and a decrease in other component i.e angular velocity. It means that the external force can not selectively change linear or angular component in pure rolling. It is so because two velocities are bound by the relation :
v
C
=
ω
R
v
C
=
ω
R
So if linear velocity increases, then the angular velocity also increases and vice-versa.
The change in velocities, however, induces a "tendency" to slide. The point in contact tends to slide as against rolling. This is the first implication of an external force or external torque on the rolling disk. If the disk rolls without sliding even after application of external force/ torque, then the friction on the rolling disk is static friction. The static friction can have values in the range from zero to maximum static friction (
μ
s
N
μ
s
N
).
f
s
<
μ
s
N
f
s
<
μ
s
N
However, if the rolling disk begins to slide as a result of the application of net external force (this happens when we give sudden acceleration or deceleration to the rolling disk), then friction at the contact is kinetic friction (
μ
k
N
μ
k
N
).
f
k
=
μ
k
N
f
k
=
μ
k
N
Under this situation, the rolling is no more pure as the rolling disk slides on the surface. The correspondence between angular and linear velocities as valid for pure rolling is not valid now. This means that :
v
C
≠
ω
R
v
C
≠
ω
R
We can appreciate this domain of rolling motion in the context of our day to day experience. Consider applying brakes on a fairly smooth wet road, while driving a car. The breaking pad housed on the axle decreases angular velocity (ω), while the car skids on the road over a distance before coming to rest. If the brake applied is sudden and hard, then the wheel might hardly rotate, whereas it slides with the velocity that of center of mass along the road. Here,
v
C
>
ω
R
v
C
>
ω
R
In this case, center of mass moves greater than "2πR" by the time the wheel completes one rotation. There may be an opposite situation. We may think of accelerating fast on a slippery wet road. The wheel rotates faster, whereas the car as a whole moves not so fast. Here,
v
C
<
ω
R
v
C
<
ω
R
In this case, center of mass moves lesser than "2πR" by the time the wheel completes one rotation.
The friction and its direction have important role to play in accelerated rolling motion on a rough surface. Unlike the case in translational motion, friction plays a positive role in maintaining pure rolling when external force or torque are applied on the disk.
External force
An external force parallel to the surface and passing through COM of the disk accelerates disk in translational motion. As it has no moment arm, the force does not constitute a torque. There is no angular acceleration imparted due to external force. Pure translation, however, requires that the relation between translational and rotational acceleration be always maintained by the relation,
α
=
a
C
R
α
=
a
C
R
In words, a translational acceleration dictates that angular velocity also increases i.e. there also is a corresponding angular acceleration. If it is not so, then rolling is not pure and
a
C
>
α
R
a
C
> α R
. Looking at the inequality, we can see that we need either to decrease translational acceleration or increase angular acceleration in order to maintain the equality relation of pure rolling.
Here, friction comes to the aid working in two ways : (i) Friction acts in such a manner such that translational acceleration is reduced and (ii) torque due to friction induces angular acceleration. This is how friction helps maintain pure rolling.
External torque
An external force not passing through COM constitutes a torque. This torque induces angular acceleration. Again, pure translation requires that the relation between translational and rotational acceleration be always maintained by the relation,
a
C
=
α
R
a
C
=
α
R
In words, an angular acceleration dictates that translational velocity also increases i.e. there also is a corresponding translational acceleration. If it is not so, then rolling is not pure and
a
C
<
α
R
a
C
< α R
. Looking at the inequality, we can see that we need either to decrease translational acceleration or increase angular acceleration in order to maintain the equality relation of pure rolling.
Here, friction comes to the aid working in two ways : (i) Friction acts in such a manner such that translational acceleration is increased and (ii) torque due to friction induces angular deceleration. This is how friction helps maintain pure rolling.
The discussion on the role of friction in rolling motion gives us definite clue about the direction of friction. Evidently it depends on the external force .vs. external torque.
We can accelerate rolling by applying force through its center of mass. Such forces do not constitute a torque about axis of rotation and has the tendency to impart sliding in the direction of acceleration of COM. However, static friction force comes into picture counteracting sliding tendency due to external force so that disk rolls without sliding. Evidently, friction force has to act in opposite direction to the component of external force parallel to contact surface.
Another way to accelerate rolling is to impart a force such that its line of action does not pass through center of mass. In this case, force constitutes a torque that impart angular acceleration. This makes the disk to slide in the opposite direction to the direction of acceleration of COM. Again, friction force comes into picture counteracting this tendency. Evidently, friction force has to act in the direction of the component of external force parallel to contact surface.
In all situations, the direction of friction is such that it opposes the tendency of sliding that results from application of force. If the rolling is accelerated by net force through COM, then friction is opposite to the direction of acceleration. The torque due to friction increases angular acceleration. On the other hand, if the rolling is accelerated by a force constituting torque, then friction is in the direction of acceleration. The torque due to friction decreases angular acceleration.