Skip to content Skip to navigation

Connexions

You are here: Home » Content » Understanding the Promotion and Tenure Process

Navigation

Content Actions

  • Download module PDF
  • Add to ...
    Add the module to:
    • My Favorites
    • A lens
    • An external social bookmarking service
    • My Favorites (What is 'My Favorites'?)
      'My Favorites' is a special kind of lens which you can use to bookmark modules and collections directly in Connexions. 'My Favorites' can only be seen by you, and collections saved in 'My Favorites' can remember the last module you were on. You need a Connexions account to use 'My Favorites'.
    • A lens (What is a lens?)

      Definition of a lens

      Lenses

      A lens is a custom view of Connexions content. You can think of it as a fancy kind of list that will let you see Connexions through the eyes of organizations and people you trust.

      What is in a lens?

      Lens makers point to Connexions materials (modules and collections), creating a guide that includes their own comments and descriptive tags about the content.

      Who can create a lens?

      Any individual Connexions member, a community, or a respected organization.

    • External bookmarks
  • E-mail the author

Recently Viewed

This feature requires Javascript to be enabled.

Understanding the Promotion and Tenure Process

Module by: Susan Cates

Summary: 2006 presentation in the Rice University NSF Advance Conference entitled “Negotiating the Ideal Faculty Position”. The focus of this presentation was educating graduate students and post-docs who aspire to academic faculty positions regarding the university promotion and tenure process. The authors of this presentation were Julia Morgan, Earth Science; Jennifer West, Bioengineering; and Kathleen S. Matthews, Dean of Natural Sciences.

Workshop Authors: Morgan, J., West, J. and Matthews K.

Slide 1: What can I do now?

  • Think about your steps all along the way
    • Consistently evaluate your own progress
      • Goals
      • Mechanisms to get there
      • Ways to learn from others and engage them
    • Keep data on all your activities
    • Ask for feedback
      • Grant writing
      • Papers
      • Teaching
  • This process is the accumulation of years of effort
    • THINK AHEAD!!!

Slide 2: Understand the General Process

  • Learn about the promotion and tenure process at your institution
    • Ask about the process when you interview
  • Request a copy of the policy
    • Be sure when you are interviewing that the policy is consistent with your personal goals
  • Understand the balance of teaching, research, and service that the institution AND the department will expect

Slide 3: General Process

Dossier

  • Summary of your independent career at institution
  • Information on all aspects of your career
    • Research summary (publications, grants, citations, awards)
    • Teaching summary (courses, evaluations, awards)
    • Service summary (activities, awards)
  • Inside reviews/letters
  • Outside letters****
    • Writers identified by department
    • Also usually writers identified by individual

Understand the timing of preparing the dossier, what you should submit and when

  • If you should submit names for Outside Letters

Understand the process completely

Don’t wait until the last minute to prepare your materials

  • Think about your research/teaching summary
  • Ensure that your papers are submitted in a timely way

Ask QUESTIONS if you do not understand

Outside Letters

  • Highly influential in decision process
  • May have opportunity to suggest names
    • Develop relationships - create a network
    • MARKET yourself!
  • Post-decision: Ask about possibility for feedback from the letters (can be useful)
  • Anticipate whom you would want to write letters and get to know those individuals

Slide 4: Publications

  • Demonstrate your contributions
  • Provide evidence of your independence
    • Issues of collaborators
      • How many?
      • How much of your time?
  • Used to assess your productivity
    • Numbers vary widely among disciplines
    • Type of publications expected also vary widely
  • Used to assess the quality of work produced
    • Citations
    • H-factor
    • Impact on the field

Slide 5: Factors Considered

  • Research
  • Teaching
  • Service
    • These factors combine to reach a decision — but the specific combination varies widely across institutions

Slide 6: Research

  • Publications/Citations/h-factor
    • Way you are known for your work
  • Grants
    • Demonstrate ability to secure funding for research
  • Presentations
    • Invitations reflect status in the field
  • Visibility/Engagement/Focus
    • Present at multiple conferences
    • Present at multiple conferences
    • Engage the leaders at those conferences
    • Invite leaders to your institution via department events
    • Reflect on level of focus in work and, if broad, engage multiple communities
  • Keep your CV up to date
    • Include students mentored at all levels (primary and secondary mentoring)
      • Undergraduates
      • Graduate Students
      • Post-doctoral Associates
    • Include advising responsibilities at all levels
    • Refereed publications
      • Some institutions request an evaluation of % effort on each
      • Citations — check your “h-factor”
    • Abstracts / Conference Proceedings
    • Presentations
      • Seminars/Workshops/Panels/etc.
      • Posters
      • Invited talks at meetings

Slide 7: Teaching

  • Effectiveness
    • Often evaluated by students
    • Ask assigned or selected mentor to provide review
  • Innovation
    • Think about ways to do it better/more effectively
    • Engage students
  • Range/breadth
    • Assignments may be focused or broad
    • Be prepared to teach beyond your comfort zone
  • Enthusiasm
    • Convey why you love what you do
    • Occasionally volunteer for something extra
  • Develop of portfolio of your teaching
    • Syllabi
    • Handouts
    • Problem sets
    • Other written materials
    • Computer-based materials
    • Examinations
    • Copies of graded papers where there is a significant writing component
    • Evaluation by a colleague
    • Student evaluations

Slide 8: Service

  • Department
    • Help your department accomplish the faculty’s goals
  • University
    • Engage in the broad community, but wisely — most P/T committees are broad
  • National Organizations
    • Choose wisely for visibility with minimum time
  • K12/Outreach Opportunities
    • Choose wisely, but make a difference

Slide 9: What Happens After Dossier Is Prepared?

  • Department Review
    • Tenured faculty generally involved in decision to recommend or deny tenure
    • Department chair writes letter
      • Some schools have subcommittee
  • School Review
    • Often school-level committee reviews and makes recommendation to dean
    • Dean makes recommendation
  • Promotion/Tenure Committee (Provost)
    • Makes recommendation to President
  • President makes final decision
  • Multiple levels of review — no one person makes the decision! Many voices are part of the process.

Slide 10: P/T versus Performance Reviews

  • Ask your institution about frequency and nature of performance reviews
    • Can be very helpful in guiding activities
    • Opportunity for mid-term feedback
    • Provide an internal view of accomplishments
      • Some may have external letters
      • Dossier can be similar to promotion dossier

Slide 11: Are there answers to my questions?

  • How many publications do I need?
  • How much grant funding?
  • How many graduate students? Post-docs?
  • How good must my teaching be? Does it matter?
  • How do I know if I’m doing enough?

There are no “right” answers to these questions, because the process is a composite of all of these and varies from place to place:

FIND OUT WHAT YOU CAN ABOUT YOUR INSTITUTION - ASK QUESTIONS!!!

Slide 12: Questions?

Ask many, ask often….

References

  1. Morgan, J., West, J. and Matthews K. (2006, October). Understanding the Promotion and Tenure Process: NSF Advance Workshop at Rice University. [http://www.advance.rice.edu/negotiatingtheidealfacultyposition/agenda.html].

Comments, questions, feedback, criticisms?

Send feedback