Connexions

You are here: Home » Content » Best Practices in Online Teaching - During Teaching - Provide Feedback and Support
Content Actions
Lenses

What is a lens?

Lenses

A lens is a custom view of Connexions content. You can think of it as a fancy kind of list that will let you see Connexions through the eyes of organizations and people you trust.

What is in a lens?

Lens makers point to Connexions materials (modules and collections), creating a guide that includes their own comments and descriptive tags about the content.

Who can create a lens?

Any individual Connexions member, a community, or a respected organization.

This content is ...
In these lenses
  • This module is included inLens: Andrei Aiordachioaie's Lens
    By: Andrei AiordachioaieAs a part of collection:"Best Practices in Online Teaching"

    Comments:

    "another test for the lens ... I wonder if the author of this article can read this comment ? :)"

    Click the "AndreiLens" link to see all content selected in this lens.

    AndreiLens
Tags

(?)

These tags come from the endorsement, affiliation, and other lenses that include this content.

Best Practices in Online Teaching - During Teaching - Provide Feedback and Support

Module by: Larry Ragan

Summary: This module focuses on strategies that online instructors can use to provide feedback and support to students in an online environment. This module is part of the Best Practices in Online Teaching Course created by Penn State University World Campus as a guide for faculty who are new to teaching in an online environment.

What to Do?

guitar_player.jpg
Figure 1: Photo, Guitar lesson at the University of Brasilia., Photo by Henrique Pinheiro, Photo #393670, http://www.sxc.hu/photo/393670
Effective online instructors provide timely, quality, and appropriate feedback to support and facilitate students’ learning process.

How to Do It?

  • Encourage students to articulate their confusion or difficulty with course content, projects, requirements, or instructions for activities
  • Provide meaningful feedback on graded assignments with recognition of good work as well as specific suggestions for improvement (See Example)
  • Respond to students’ concerns or technical difficulties quickly and provide contact information of tech support
  • Peer assessment can provide additional feedback opportunity while reducing faculty workload (Ko & Rossen, 2004, p.122).
  • In online discussions, your students will feel motivated to participate and learn when you:
    • Encourage openness in online discussions or collaborative assignment and allow different opinions to exist
    • Diagnose misconception without delay to avoid further misunderstanding or confusion, but explain with background information
    • Provide timely feedback to comment, confirm, evaluate, or to question
    • Provide additional important resources for further study
    • Use gentle reminders to carry the discussion further or redirect discussions
    • Encourage your students to use examples, real cases, or literature to support their views
    • See Anderson et. al (2001) Coding Scheme for Facilitating Discussions for more suggestions
Example 1: Feedback to Students 
Email sent to class, ESL 015, Fall 06
Hi class,
Here's my feedback in your work on the summary of Lean's article.
What I was looking at:
a) if you have explicitly and clearly summarized the points as to why numerical grading system is not appropriate. Don't just say it's bad because it's unfair: Lean explained why it is unfair and how it can be detrimental to the students.
b) if you sum up the points as to why descriptive reports on the students might be a better way to replace the numerical grading. You need to include claims and assumptions about why this system would work better. His claim might be "descriptive way works better", but his assumption can be the reasons why that would work better. Let me see, as your reader, why Lean was supporting the descriptive way.
c) how you citied his examples in your own words to support points a) and b).
Please review your summary and see if you have stated all of these three points. Again, I would welcome your further revision on your summary.
Thank you. K. Park

Voice of Experience

To hear insights from experienced online instructors about preparing for online teaching, access any or all of the following interviews. Please make sure your audio is enabled.
Alfred Turgeon
altugeon.jpg
Figure 2
Alfred Turgeon - Evolution of Teaching Style(Interviewed by Larry Ragan) (mp3)
Figure 3
Alfred Turgeon - Adapting Content to Course Level (Interviewed by Larry Ragan) (mp3)
Figure 4

Why Do It?

Anderson, T. et al. (2001) suggests that a common problem in computer conferencing is the difficulty of focusing and refining discussions, which are typically limited to information sharing instead of knowledge construction, application, and integration. Such problems are attributed to the absence of a teaching presence.
Thomas (2002) suggests that three factors account for the lack of “normal discussion” necessary for learning to take place: “isolated mode of participation, the structural organization of messages, and the conflict between the written form and oral function of technology-mediated interpersonal communication” (p.362); good facilitation by a tutor or moderator is important to creating coherent online discussions.
Direct instruction still plays an important role in online learning, but it may take different forms than in traditional face-to-face settings. See Anderson, et al. (2001) for examples (see Anderson, et al. (2001, table page 10):

References:

Anderson, T., Rourke, L., Garrison, D.R., Archer, W. (2001). Assessing teaching presence in a computer conferencing context. Journal of Asychronous Learning Networks, 5(2), 1-17
Ko, S. & Rossen, S. (2004). Teaching Online: A practical guide. 2nd Ed. New York: Houghton Mifflin Company.
Thomas, M.J.W. (2002). Learning within incoherent structures: the space of online discussion forums. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18, 351-366

Comments, questions, feedback, criticisms?

Send feedback