SIGNAL TIME – SPREADING
Signal Time-Spreading Viewed in the Time-Delay Domain
A simple way to model the fading phenomenon is proposed the notion wide-sense stationary uncorrelated scattering. The model treats arriving at a receive antenna with different delay as uncorrelated.
In Figure 1(a), a multipath-intensity profile S(τ) is plotted. S(τ) helps us understand how the average received power vary as a function of time delay τ. The term “time delay” is used to refer to the excess delay. It represents the signal’s propagation delay that exceeds the delay of the first signal arrival at the receiver. In wireless channel, the received signal usually consists of several discrete multipath components causing S(τ). For a single transmitted impulse, the time
TmTm size 12{T rSub { size 8{m} } } {} between the first and last received component represents the maximum excess delay.
Degradation Categories due to Signal Time-Spreading Viewed in the Time-Delay Domain
In a fading channel, the relationship between maximum excess delay time
TmTm size 12{T rSub { size 8{m} } } {} and symbol time
TsTs size 12{T rSub { size 8{s} } } {} can be viewed in terms of two different degradation categories: frequency-selective fading and frequency nonselective or flat fading.
A channel is said to exhibit frequency selective fading if
Tm>TsTm>Ts size 12{T rSub { size 8{m} } >T rSub { size 8{s} } } {}. This condition occurs whenever the received multipath components of a symbol extend beyond the symbol’s time duration. In fact, another name for this category of fading degradation is channel-induced ISI. In this case of frequency-selective fading, mitigating the distortion is possible because many of the multipath components are resolved by receiver.
A channel is said to exhibit frequency nonselective or flat fading if
Tm<TsTm<Ts size 12{T rSub { size 8{m} } <T rSub { size 8{s} } } {}. In this case, all of the received multipath components of a symbol arrive within the symbol time duration; hence, the components are not resolvable. There is no channel-induced ISI distortion because the signal time spreading does not result in significant overlap among neighboring received symbols.
Signal Time-Spreading Viewed in the Frequency Domain
A completely analogous characterization of signal dispersion can be specified in the frequency domain. In figure 1b, the spaced-frequency correlation function
∣R(Δf)∣∣R(Δf)∣ size 12{ lline R \( Δf \) rline } {} can be seen, it is the Fourier transform of S(τ). The correlation function
∣R(Δf)∣∣R(Δf)∣ size 12{ lline R \( Δf \) rline } {} represents the correlation between the response of channel to two signals as a function of the frequency difference between two signals. The function
∣R(Δf)∣∣R(Δf)∣ size 12{ lline R \( Δf \) rline } {} helps answer the correlation between received signals that are spaced in the frequency
Δf=f1−f2Δf=f1−f2 size 12{Δf=f rSub { size 8{1} } - f rSub { size 8{2} } } {} is what.
∣R(Δf)∣∣R(Δf)∣ size 12{ lline R \( Δf \) rline } {} can be measured by transmitting a pair of sinusoids separated in frequency by Δf, cross-correlating the complex spectra of two separated received signals, and repeating the process many times with ever-larger separation Δf. Spectral components in that range are affected by the channel in a similar manner. Note that the coherence bandwidth
f0f0 size 12{f rSub { size 8{0} } } {} and the maximum excess delay time
TmTm size 12{T rSub { size 8{m} } } {} are related as approximation below
f0≈1Tmf0≈1Tm size 12{f rSub { size 8{0} } approx { {1} over {T rSub { size 8{m} } } } } {}(1)
A more useful parameter is the delay spread, most often characterized in terms of its root-mean-square (rms) value, can be calculated as
στ=(τ2¯−τ¯2)1/2στ=(τ2¯−τ¯2)1/2 size 12{σ rSub { size 8{τ} } = \( {overline {τ rSup { size 8{2} } }} - {overline {τ}} rSup { size 8{2} } \) rSup { size 8{1/2} } } {}(2)
Where
τˉτˉ size 12{ { bar {τ}}} {} is the mean excess delay,
(τˉ)2(τˉ)2 size 12{ \( { bar {τ}} \) rSup { size 8{2} } } {} is the mean squared,
τ2¯τ2¯ size 12{ {overline {τ rSup { size 8{2} } }} } {} is the second moment and
στστ size 12{σ rSub { size 8{τ} } } {} is the square root of the second central moment of S(τ).
A relationship between coherence bandwidth and delay spread does not exist. However, using Fourier transform techniques an approximation can be derived from actual signal dispersion measurements in various channel. Several approximate relationships have been developed.
If the coherence bandwidth is defined as the frequency interval over which the channel’s complex frequency transfer function has a correlation of at least 0.9, the coherent bandwidth is approximately
f0≈150στf0≈150στ size 12{f rSub { size 8{0} } approx { {1} over {"50"σ rSub { size 8{τ} } } } } {}(3)
With the dense-scatterer channel model, coherence bandwidth is defined as the frequency interval over which the channel’s complex frequency transfer function has a correlation of at least 0.5, to be
f0≈12πστf0≈12πστ size 12{f rSub { size 8{0} } approx { {1} over {2 ital "πσ" rSub { size 8{τ} } } } } {}(4)
Studies involving ionospheric effects often employ the following definition
f0≈15στf0≈15στ size 12{f rSub { size 8{0} } approx { {1} over {5σ rSub { size 8{τ} } } } } {}(5)
The delay spread and coherence bandwidth are related to a channel’s multipath characteristic, differing for different propagation paths. It is important to note that all parameters in last equation independent of signaling speed, a system’s signaling speed only influences its transmission bandwidth W.
Degradation Categories due to Signal Time-Spreading Viewed in the Frequency Domain
A channel is preferred to as frequency-selective if
f0<1/Ts≈Wf0<1/Ts≈W size 12{f rSub { size 8{0} } <1/T rSub { size 8{s} } approx W} {} (the symbol rate is taken to be equal to the signaling rate or signal bandwidth W). Frequency selective fading distortion occurs whenever a signal’s spectral components are not all affected equally by the channel. Some of the signal’s spectra components failing outside the coherent bandwidth will be affected differently, compared with those components contained within the coherent bandwidth (Figure 2(a)).
Frequency- nonselective of flat-fading degradation occurs whenever
f0>Wf0>W size 12{f rSub { size 8{0} } >W} {}. hence, all of signal’s spectral components will be affected by the channel in a similar manner (fading or non-fading) (Figure 2(b)). Flat fading does not introduce channel-induced ISI distortion, but performance degradation can still be expected due to the loss in SNR whenever the signal is fading. In order to avoid channel-induced ISI distortion, the channel is required to exhibit flat fading. This occurs, provide that
f
0
>
W
≈
1
T
s
f
0
>
W
≈
1
T
s
size 12{f rSub { size 8{0} } >W approx { {1} over {T rSub { size 8{s} } } } } {}
(6)
Hence, the channel coherent bandwidth f0 set an upper limit on the transmission rate that can be used without incorporating an equalizer in the receiver.
However, as a mobile radio changes its position, there will be times when the received signal experiences frequency-selective distortion even though
f0>Wf0>W size 12{f rSub { size 8{0} } >W} {} (in Figure 2(c)). When this occurs, the baseband pulse can be especially mutilated by deprivation of its low-frequency components. Thus, even though a channel is categorized as flat-fading, it still manifests frequency-selective fading.
Examples of Flat Fading and Frequency-Selective Fading
The signal dispersion manifestation of the fading channel is analogous to the signal spreading that characterizes an electronic filter. Figure 3(a) depicts a wideband filter (narrow impulse response) and its effect on a signal in both time domain and the frequency domain. This filter resembles a flat-fading channel yielding an output that is relatively free of dispersion. Figure 3(b) shows a narrowband filter (wide impulse response). The output signal suffers much distortion, as shown both time domain and frequency domain. Here the process resembles a frequency-selective channel.