Skip to content Skip to navigation

Connexions

You are here: Home » Content » Ethics in Statistics

Navigation

Lenses

What is a lens?

Definition of a lens

Lenses

A lens is a custom view of the content in the repository. You can think of it as a fancy kind of list that will let you see content through the eyes of organizations and people you trust.

What is in a lens?

Lens makers point to materials (modules and collections), creating a guide that includes their own comments and descriptive tags about the content.

Who can create a lens?

Any individual member, a community, or a respected organization.

What are tags? tag icon

Tags are descriptors added by lens makers to help label content, attaching a vocabulary that is meaningful in the context of the lens.

This content is ...

Affiliated with (What does "Affiliated with" mean?)

This content is either by members of the organizations listed or about topics related to the organizations listed. Click each link to see a list of all content affiliated with the organization.
  • EAC Toolkit display tagshide tags

    This module is included inLens: Collaborative Development of Ethics Across the Curriculum Resources and Sharing of Best Practices
    By: University of Puerto Rico at Mayaguez - College of Business Administration

    Click the "EAC Toolkit" link to see all content affiliated with them.

    Click the tag icon tag icon to display tags associated with this content.

Recently Viewed

This feature requires Javascript to be enabled.

Tags

(What is a tag?)

These tags come from the endorsement, affiliation, and other lenses that include this content.
 

Ethics in Statistics

Module by: Maria de los A. Medina. E-mail the author

Based on: Building an Ethics Module for Business, Science, and Engineering Students by Jose A. Cruz-Cruz, William Frey

Summary: Statisticians and researchers encounter many ethical issues in their jobs. Statistics students could benefit if they study examples of non ethical behaviors in the field of statistics. After reading different scenarios, they will describe the wrong behavior, comment on the consequences of the behavior, and suggest steps to avoid it.

Introduction

Introduction

This module is designed to help you understand how ethical issues arise daily in the field of statistics. You will examine everyday scenarios or decision points and respond in terms of the ethical issues that arise. Below are frameworks that describe how to test your decisions and solutions in terms of their ethics.

What you need to know …

One of the most difficult stages in problem solving is to jump start the process of brainstorming solutions. If you are stuck then here are some generic options guaranteed to get you "unstuck."

  1. Gather Information: Many disagreements can be resolved by gathering more information. Because this is the easiest and least painful way of reaching consensus, it is almost always best to start here. Gathering information may not be possible because of different constraints: there may not be enough time, the facts may be too expensive to gather, or the information required goes beyond scientific or technical knowledge. Sometimes gathering more information does not solve the problem but allows for a new, more fruitful formulation of the problem. Harris, Pritchard, and Rabins in Engineering Ethics: Concepts and Cases show how solving a factual disagreement allows a more profound conceptual disagreement to emerge.
  2. Nolo Contendere. Nolo Contendere is latin for not opposing or contending. Your interests may conflict with your supervisor but he or she may be too powerful to reason with or oppose. So your only choice here is to give in to his or her interests. The problem with nolo contendere is that non-opposition is often taken as agreement. You may need to document (e.g., through memos) that you disagree with a course of action and that your choosing not to oppose does not indicate agreement.
  3. Negotiate. Good communication and diplomatic skills may make it possible to negotiate a solution that respects the different interests. Value integrative solutions are designed to integrate conflicting values. Compromises allow for partial realization of the conflicting interests. (See the module, The Ethics of Team Work, for compromise strategies such as logrolling or bridging.) Sometimes it may be necessary to set aside one's interests for the present with the understanding that these will be taken care of at a later time. This requires trust.
  4. Oppose. If nolo contendere and negotiation are not possible, then opposition may be necessary. Opposition requires marshalling evidence to document one's position persuasively and impartially. It makes use of strategies such as leading an "organizational charge" or "blowing the whistle." For more on whistle-blowing consult the discussion of whistle blowing in the Hughes case that can be found at computing cases.
  5. Exit. Opposition may not be possible if one lacks organizational power or documented evidence. Nolo contendere will not suffice if non-opposition implicates one in wrongdoing. Negotiation will not succeed without a necessary basis of trust or a serious value integrative solution. As a last resort, one may have to exit from the situation by asking for reassignment or resigning.

What you will do ...

INSTRUCTIONS: Step 1. Read the scenarios and individually answer the questions below them.Step 2. Informally share or duscuss your answers with the class.Step 3. Use tests to evaluate the scennarios proposed in step 1.

There are three steps to complete the module.

Step 1: Individually evaluate the scenarios below and for each of them:

  • Describe the unethical behavior.
  • Describe the consequences of this behavior.
  • Suggest possible positive changes to the unethical behavior.

A data collector intentionally misses three houses he should visit because it is time to pick up her daughter at school. Later, he fills the three questionnaires for the homes missed.

  • Describe the unethical behavior.
  • Describe the consequences of this behavior.
  • Suggest possible positive changes to the unethical behavior.

After analyzing a set of data, a researcher found the results of the study were not the ones expected by his boss. He decided to change the data items needed to make a significant change in the results.

  • Describe the unethical behavior.
  • Describe the consequences of this behavior.
  • Suggest possible positive changes to the unethical behavior.

A researcher wanted to prove that the students of a certain university drank more alcohol beverages than the students from another university. He collected the data for the study in different pubs of the city located near the first university.

  • Describe the unethical behavior.
  • Describe the consequences of this behavior.
  • Suggest possible positive changes to the unethical behavior.

A researcher is in favor of integrating sex education in elementary school. When asked to conduct a study in this area, he developed a questionnaire that enhances the benefits of the program and degrades ones not in favor.

  1. Describe the unethical behavior.
  2. Describe the consequences of this behavior.
  3. Suggest possible positive changes to the unethical behavior.

A newspaper published the results of a poll in a very controversial issue. After reading it, a statistician thinks the study was not reliable because it had a lot of mistakes. He wanted to call the editor to inform about the mistakes of the poll. The stress in his job makes him forget about the call and he did not did it.

  • Describe the unethical behavior.
  • Describe the consequences of this behavior.
  • Suggest possible positive changes to the unethical behavior.

After concluding a study, the researcher found the level of significance to be statistically unacceptable. Since he knew his boss did not know a lot about statistics he did not include this information on his report.

  • Describe the unethical behavior.
  • Describe the consequences of this behavior.
  • Suggest possible positive changes to the unethical behavior.

An employer spent a lot of money in the establishment of a new program. The program did not produce the profits expected. When he presented the results, he used a big scale in the profit graphic to make believe the profits produced were greater.

  • Describe the unethical behavior.
  • Describe the consequences of this behavior.
  • Suggest possible positive changes to the unethical behavior.

Step Two: Informally share or discuss your answers with the class. Use the space below to make notes.

Step Three: Use these tests to structure your discussion of another scenario.

  • REVERSIBILITY: Would I think this a good choice if I were among those affected by it?
  • PUBLICITY: Would I want this action published in the newspaper?
  • HARM: Does this action do less harm than any available alternative?
  • FEASIBILITY: Can this solution be implemented given resource, interest, and technical constraints?

Gray Matters

What did you learn?

Sample Module Close Out

Reflection helps us successfully to close the act of learning. Module activities are designed to give us feedback on our decisions and problem solving. How did your group, your class, and your teacher react to your conclusions and arguments? What can you learn from these reactions?

Appendix

EAC ToolKit Project

This module is a WORK-IN-PROGRESS; the author(s) may update the content as needed. Others are welcome to use this module or create a new derived module. You can COLLABORATE to improve this module by providing suggestions and/or feedback on your experiences with this module.

Please see the Creative Commons License regarding permission to reuse this material.

Funded by the National Science Foundation: "Collaborative Development of Ethics Across the Curriculum Resources and Sharing of Best Practices," NSF-SES-0551779

Content actions

Download module as:

PDF | EPUB (?)

What is an EPUB file?

EPUB is an electronic book format that can be read on a variety of mobile devices.

Downloading to a reading device

For detailed instructions on how to download this content's EPUB to your specific device, click the "(?)" link.

| More downloads ...

Add module to:

My Favorites (?)

'My Favorites' is a special kind of lens which you can use to bookmark modules and collections. 'My Favorites' can only be seen by you, and collections saved in 'My Favorites' can remember the last module you were on. You need an account to use 'My Favorites'.

| A lens I own (?)

Definition of a lens

Lenses

A lens is a custom view of the content in the repository. You can think of it as a fancy kind of list that will let you see content through the eyes of organizations and people you trust.

What is in a lens?

Lens makers point to materials (modules and collections), creating a guide that includes their own comments and descriptive tags about the content.

Who can create a lens?

Any individual member, a community, or a respected organization.

What are tags? tag icon

Tags are descriptors added by lens makers to help label content, attaching a vocabulary that is meaningful in the context of the lens.

| External bookmarks