Skip to content Skip to navigation

Connexions

You are here: Home » Content » Theme 1: Indian response to white incursion

Navigation

Content Actions

  • Download module PDF
  • Add to ...
    Add the module to:
    • My Favorites
    • A lens
    • An external social bookmarking service
    • My Favorites (What is 'My Favorites'?)
      'My Favorites' is a special kind of lens which you can use to bookmark modules and collections directly in Connexions. 'My Favorites' can only be seen by you, and collections saved in 'My Favorites' can remember the last module you were on. You need a Connexions account to use 'My Favorites'.
    • A lens (What is a lens?)

      Definition of a lens

      Lenses

      A lens is a custom view of Connexions content. You can think of it as a fancy kind of list that will let you see Connexions through the eyes of organizations and people you trust.

      What is in a lens?

      Lens makers point to Connexions materials (modules and collections), creating a guide that includes their own comments and descriptive tags about the content.

      Who can create a lens?

      Any individual Connexions member, a community, or a respected organization.

    • External bookmarks
  • E-mail the author

Recently Viewed

This feature requires Javascript to be enabled.

Theme 1: Indian response to white incursion

Module by: Richard Daniel

Summary: This module discusses important events and people of Indian response to white incursion.

Key 5 Indian responses to white

Incursion

OVERVIEW Native Americans were unable to resist the superior numbers and technology of the white society and were forced to accept settlement on whatever lands the U.S. government was willing to give them. Formal warfare between Indians and whites ended by 1886, when Geronimo, an Apache chief in the Southwest, surrendered to white forces.

Indian resistance to white settlement: Indian response emerged from the 1850s to the 1880s and focused on wagon trains, stagecoaches, white soldiers, and scattered settlements.

  • By the 1860s the U.S. Army conducted most of the warfare againstWestern Indians.
  • Fighting was usually small scale.
  • The last native Americans to maintain organized resistance againstwhites were the Apaches, who fought into the 1880s.

Battle of Little Bighorn (1876): One of the most infamous conflicts between whites and native Americans, this battle occurred in Montana.

  • Some 200 soldiers in the U.S. Army, under General GeorgeArmstrong Custer's command, were surrounded and killed bybetween 2,500 and 4,000 Sioux and Cheyenne warriors under theleadership of Crazy Horse and Sitting Bull.
  • These Indians had left their reservation in 1875, although orderedto return by white officials.
  • Thereafter, the U.S. Army sought out the Indians and returnedthem to the Dakotas. Crazy Horse and Sitting Bull accepted life onreservations and were later killed by reservation police.
  • This episode was a reaction to the entrance of miners into theBlack Hills and to the corrupt behavior of white agents.

Chase of the Nez Perce (1877): Another major conflict occurred in Idaho.

  • The Nez Perce, a small tribe, refused a U.S. government order tomove to a smaller reservation.
  • Their leader, Chief Joseph, urged them to follow him into Canada.
  • The 550 men, women, and children who chose to go were pursuedby troops until caught near the Canadian border.
  • They were then forced to live in the Indian Territory in Oklahoma,where many soon died of disease and malnutrition.

Wounded Knee, South Dakota (1890): Led by the Seventh Cavalry, This massacre, in which about 200 Sioux Indians died, was the last episode in a year-long effort by whites to stop a Sioux religious revival known as the Ghost Dance.

Dawes Severalty Act (1887): Designed to accelerate the assimilation of Native Americans into white culture.

  • It provided for the division of Indian lands among individual fam­ilies and for U.S. citizenship for Native Americans who abandonedtribal allegiances.
  • Specifically, 160 acres was allotted to the head of a family, 80 acresto a single adult or an orphan, and 40 acres to each dependent child.Full title to the property was gained after 25 years.
  • In actual practice, much of the reservation land was never distrib­uted to individual owners.
  • Under this act, nearly on half of the Indian land was lost to whitesettlement.

Assimilation: In conjunction with the Dawes Severalty Act, the Bureau of Indian Affairs also tried other means of assimilation.

•Indian children were taken from their families and sent to whiteboarding schools.

Christianity was encouraged, and churches were established on reservations to stop Indian religious festivals.

10

11

Comments, questions, feedback, criticisms?

Send feedback