- You need to be prepared to address the issue in the long run
- You need more than a great idea
- You need to understand the logistics
“To everyone who has ever faced adversity, whether in business, professional or personal life. I admire the person who says: Every day someone does something great. Today that person will be me.”
-- Lou Holtz
- Bonus points if not much work has been done on the problem
- More bonus points if you have done the important work
- Established track record of publications
- Clear and convincing preliminary data
- “Calm down, understand the situation and communicate clearly” – We Were Soldiers
Navigating the Scylla of building on your accomplishments and the Charybdis of creating new research problems and attacking new research areas, given your situation:
- Laboratory techniques not yet working
- Students not yet trained/busy with classes
- Teaching and other responsibilities
- Not making clear the points and connections that are obvious to you
- Do not redo your Ph.D. or postdoc work.
- Find a substantially new project if your proposal is rejected twice.
- Read deeply and broadly (several articles a day).
- Be creative.
- Do not be afraid to do something really different.
- Talk to lots of people about research.
- Keeps you excited.
- When one project faces problems, another could be blooming.
- Increases funding opportunities.
- Synergy in thinking about different things can suggest novel pathways.
- Increases your visibility.
“Do one thing and do it better than anyone”
-- Orville Redenbacher
- Identify a funding agency and learn everything you can about this agency (the web and your colleagues are good sources)
- Understand what is the mechanism for submitting a proposal from your institution (“Office of Sponsored Research”)
- Develop a time frame for writing and proofreading the proposal
NIH - www.nih.gov
- CRISP – Database of funded projects
- http://crisp.cit.nih.gov/
- NIH Review Criteria
- Article: How to get NIH funding
NSF - www.nsf.gov
- CAREER program
- Engineering Division
- http://www.nsf.gov/home/eng/
- Article: NSF grant writing
Private Foundations
- Coulter, March of Dimes, and many others
[slide modified from Kinney, Neptune and Wilson]
- Office of Naval Research (ONR) and other federal programs
NIDRR - The National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research
- Miscellaneous Funding links
- Industry
- SBIR mechanism (NSF, NIH)
- Direct Funding from Companies
[slide modified from Kinney, Neptune and Wilson]
- Do not necessarily assume the person who reviews your grant will be an expert in your area or know why your research is novel
The response to a revised NIH grant is very important.
- Never appear to be angry or emotional. Just stick to the science. If a reviewer got something wrong (which often happens), just lay out the facts.
- This is hard because you have put so much effort into the grant it’s easy to take comments personally
- Criticisms are of the science, not of you!
Get grants done in advance and have colleagues read them!
- Resist the thrill of pulling it off on “third and long”
- Your “growth” as a researcher is essential
- Publish, collaborate, discuss your ideas, read, be brave and be prepared to fail
- Funding is a means to an end, not an end in itself
- Ignore colleagues who imply otherwise
Raphael Lab
- Emily, Yong, Ryan, Jeff, Imran, Jenni, Louise
Thanks for Believing in Us!
- NSF CAREER
- NIH NIDCD
- Whitaker Foundation
- Texas Advanced Technology Program
- National Organization for Hearing Research
- NIH NRSA (Greeson, Organ)
- NSF-IGERT
- Keck Center for Computational and Structural Biology
- DOE Computational Science Graduate Fellowship