Summary: Avoiding plagiarism is an increasingly important requirement for student writing. This document therefore defines plagiarism, both intentional and accidental; gives the imperatives for avoiding it; shows citation examples; and demonstrates how paraphrase can replace plagiarism by means of an interactive exercise. Coverage of the plagiarism issues will be more complete if you use this document in conjunction with Copyright and Electronic Publishing: Citation and with the Template for Taking Notes on Research Articles, both found in the Cain Project resources. Do not consider these documents to be legal advice: The author is not an attorney.
Plagiarism is the use of someone else’s ideas, results, equipment design, visuals, wording, or even sentence structure as if they were your own.
Plagiarism can be intentional:
Or it can be accidental:
In the United States, plagiarism is considered academic misconduct, and you are expected to avoid plagiarism, either intentional or accidental.
Plagiarized work can result in a failing course grade, expulsion, rejection of a paper submitted for publication, denial of an advanced degree, or loss of job. It is increasingly serious now that the Internet has made plagiarism easier than ever before.
For each source you read, use a Template for Taking Notes such as the one on the Cain Project web site: http://www.owlnet.rice.edu/~cainproj. As you enter the information, proofread for completeness and accuracy. As you take notes, put quotation marks around any wording that you copy directly from the source so that later you can put it into your own words and won’t accidentally plagiarize.
If you copy something word for word, put quotation marks around it and cite it: (Jones 2005). If you paraphrase by putting ideas into your own words, cite the source of the ideas: (Jones 2005). If you copy a Figure or Table, cite it at the end of the caption and inside the period: (Jones 2005). If you adapt a Figure or Table or use only part of it, cite it at the end of the caption: (Adapted from Jones 2005). Put the complete bibliographic reference for all citations in the Bibliography (or Works Cited).
Practice paraphrasing (putting someone else’s ideas into your own words) because it’s often difficult to do. Avoid the temptation of paraphrasing too many details. Focus on the main idea or evidence that you need to cite. Once you have determined what you need to paraphrase, reread the source and then cover it up. Write the main idea from memory and then check to verify that you haven’t used exact wording or sentence structure. Simply changing the verb tense or substituting one adverb for another, but leaving the sentence structure essentially the same, is still considered to be plagiarism.
If you simply cannot figure out a different way of saying it, use quotation marks to indicate that you are quoting exactly. [Because few writers in science or engineering use quotations, generally preferring paraphrases, paraphrasing is a skill you must learn in those fields. In contrast, writers in the humanities often use quotations to illustrate key points, but they also paraphrase when exact wording is not essential.]
Always cite your source, whether for text, visuals, or ideas. If you cannot remember the source, you can’t use the information. Put citations in as you write your first draft so that you don’t have to go back later when identifying the source may be difficult.
In your text, make clear what the source is. Generally, it is a good idea to identify an author by name rather than by referring to a number in your bibliography, though this practice varies somewhat by field or by journal. In any case, try not use a reference number as a part of speech. Do not, for example, write that “[10] gives more compelling evidence than [98] provides.” Think of how time consuming it is for a reader to have to keep flipping to the bibliography to see who has said what. It would be preferable to write “Johnson (10) gives more compelling evidence than Dickerson (98) provides.” And then move to the evidence, clearly identifying the references as you discuss the evidence each author gives. [Whether you use square brackets or parentheses depends on the field or journal.]
CONFUSING: [10] and [15] were the next to apply this algorithm to new genetic sequences.
CONFUSING: The first big improvement came in the work of [10].
CLEAR: Koninsky et al. and Rebert et al. were the next to apply this algorithm to new genetic sequences (10, 15).
CLEAR: Koninsky et al. (10) and Rebert et al. (15) were the next to apply this algorithm to new genetic sequences.
CLEAR: Smith and Wesson (2001) were the next to apply this algorithm to new genetic sequences.
CLEAR: Research teams then began to apply this algorithm to new genetic sequences (Smith and Wesson 2001).
CLEAR: Research teams then began to apply this algorithm to new genetic sequences. (See, for example, Smith and Wesson 2001 and Rebert et al. 2004.)
RIGHT, but LESS CLEAR: Research teams then began to apply this algorithm to new genetic sequences. (See, e.g., 10, 15, and 22.)
For suggestions on how to avoid plagiarism and cite information, see Diana Hacker’s The Bedford Handbook, 7th ed. (2006), pp. 572-579; 698-790. She includes extensive examples of APA and Chicago style guides. I suggest, too, that you check the Web site for the book: www.dianahacker.com/bedhandbook for further information. Or go to other Web Site sources: Check Google for the APA Citation Style Guide or the Chicago Manual of Style Citation Guide.
The original text:
“The new Internet economy has brought about the development of competing search engine companies, each with its own proprietary software. Sites are collected and updated differently. After a search is conducted, one search engine provides exactly what’s required within the first ten hits whereas another is useless. Frequently there is tremendous overlap, although no two search engines are exactly alike. Since the outcome varies from search engine to search engine, researchers often find it necessary to use several engines for the same question for either the best or more comprehensive results.”Burnett, Rebecca E. (2001). Technical Communication (5th ed.). Fort Worth: Harcourt, Inc., p. 199.
Read the following examples and decide if each is an example of acceptable paraphrasing or of plagiarism.
You don’t have to cite basic knowledge that is found in two or more textbooks. But neither can you use it word for word—you must paraphrase. The exception would be something like a common formula or algorithm; those you would have to use as they appear in the source.
If you use it word for word rather than paraphrasing it, you must cite the source. I know of an Assistant Professor who was denied tenure for taking a method word for word from a published paper.
You will have to cite the source as well as the review article. It’s always best to get a copy of the original article instead of relying on what someone else says about it. Reviewers are not equally good, and even a good reviewer may be focusing on different aspects of the article than you need. The exception would be an article originally published in a language you can’t read or an article that is no longer available. In such cases you must make clear that it is the reviewer’s interpretation that you are citing.
Everything you cited and nothing that you didn’t cite.
See if you can track it down via the Internet. If you can’t find it, you can’t use it.
Of course! Keep in mind, though, that every author listed on a published paper has equal copyright ownership and can also cite the paper. Being first author does not give you sole ownership. If you were first author and are now using essentially the entire paper as a chapter in your Master’s or PhD thesis, make clear at the outset of the chapter that it comes largely from your paper (cite it clearly!). Then later in the chapter make it absolutely clear that the chapter is based on your paper. If you use any figures or tables from the published paper, cite those as well. If you are using your thesis as the basis for a paper, make that clear, too. You can cite it as an unpublished thesis or dissertation.
In the academic world, this is sometimes a gray area. You usually don’t have to get permission for use if you are writing a paper for a class, a Master’s thesis, or a PhD dissertation, though you must cite the source. And because being cited helps faculty receive tenure or academic awards, most researchers are delighted to be cited in academic journals. Journals may have guidelines, though, so be sure to check. The issue becomes less clear if your paper is chosen to be published in a Proceedings; you may well have to get permission for use there. Check with the editors. And if you publish a book, you will almost certainly need to get permission from the author. Keep a paper copy of your request and a paper copy of the reply. If your paper comes out of funded research, you may need permission to publish what might otherwise be considered the intellectual property of the funding agency.
Author: Janice L. Hewitt, Ph.D., Rice University. jhewitt@rice.edu