Skip to content Skip to navigation

Connexions

You are here: Home » Content » Integrative Thinking From a Students Perspective

Navigation

Content Actions

  • Download module PDF
  • Add to ...
    Add the module to:
    • My Favorites
    • A lens
    • An external social bookmarking service
    • My Favorites (What is 'My Favorites'?)
      'My Favorites' is a special kind of lens which you can use to bookmark modules and collections directly in Connexions. 'My Favorites' can only be seen by you, and collections saved in 'My Favorites' can remember the last module you were on. You need a Connexions account to use 'My Favorites'.
    • A lens (What is a lens?)

      Definition of a lens

      Lenses

      A lens is a custom view of Connexions content. You can think of it as a fancy kind of list that will let you see Connexions through the eyes of organizations and people you trust.

      What is in a lens?

      Lens makers point to Connexions materials (modules and collections), creating a guide that includes their own comments and descriptive tags about the content.

      Who can create a lens?

      Any individual Connexions member, a community, or a respected organization.

    • External bookmarks
  • E-mail the author

Recently Viewed

This feature requires Javascript to be enabled.

Integrative Thinking From a Students Perspective

Module by: Hope Matney

Summary: A principal prep students views on integrative thinking.

INTEGRATIVE THINKING

Determining Salience basically means figuring out what is or is not important in a specific matter. Integrative thinkers believe that all factors are important and should be considered when making a decision. Just like corporate leaders, school administrators see an abundance of unique problems on a daily basis. For example, special education, regular education, and gifted education all have different issues that must be addressed accordingly. Additionally there is the business aspect of education (budget, technology, and school improvement, etc.) that must be properly dealt with in order to run an efficient school. If an administrator begins to narrow down the options without addressing all of them, then they will miss out on some better results. In short, the “either/or” concept must be abandoned in order to be a good administrator.

Analyzing Causality

While it is true that the shortest distance between two points is a straight line if you do not connect all of the dots then you do not get to see the complete puzzle. Conventional thinkers typically go from point A to point B with as little upset to business as usual. Where as, the integrative thinker likes to conceptualize all of the options between point A to point Z. It’s not the shortest distance between two point that makes for the best decision. It is the smartest, most beneficial, and overall best decision, where all factors have been considered simultaneously, that is the most important to an integrative thinker.

Envisioning the Decision Architecture

Conventional thinkers often fix things one problem at a time. They break down the problem into sections and fix it one section at a time. This is not a very productive way to solve problems, especially in a school system. School administrators face many different problems everyday. Like integrative thinkers, they must embrace every aspect of the problem. If not, the problem will arise in the future. For example, if a brick mason leaves a brick out a wall on a new school he is helping to build, the hole in the wall will eventually cause problems and will weaken the school. The same applies to administrators, if you do not address the problem when it arises, it will weaken the school in some form or another in the future.

Achieving Resolution

It is human nature to solve a problem the quickest and simplest way. A conventional thinker would believe that the sooner the problem is solved, the better the situation. This however, may not be the most efficient choice. Integrative thinkers believe that solving a problem the simplest and quickest way important aspects can be left out. Although this can produce positive results, it will not produce the highest potential that solving the problem can bring. We want positive results as administrators but we should strive for the highest potential that solving a problem can bring.

Comments, questions, feedback, criticisms?

Send feedback