Skip to content Skip to navigation

Connexions

You are here: Home » Content » Butterworth Filter Properties

Navigation

Lenses

What is a lens?

Definition of a lens

Lenses

A lens is a custom view of Connexions content. You can think of it as a fancy kind of list that will let you see Connexions through the eyes of organizations and people you trust.

What is in a lens?

Lens makers point to Connexions materials (modules and collections), creating a guide that includes their own comments and descriptive tags about the content.

Who can create a lens?

Any individual Connexions member, a community, or a respected organization.

What are tags? tag icon

Tags are descriptors added by lens makers to help label content, attaching a vocabulary that is meaningful in the context of the lens.

This content is ...

Affiliated with (What does "Affiliated with" mean?)

This content is either by members of the organizations listed or about topics related to the organizations listed. Click each link to see a list of all content affiliated with the organization.
  • Featured Content

    This module is included inLens: Connexions Featured Content
    By: ConnexionsAs a part of collection:"Digital Signal Processing and Digital Filter Design (Draft)"

    Click the "Featured Content" link to see all content affiliated with them.

Recently Viewed

This feature requires Javascript to be enabled.

Butterworth Filter Properties

Module by: C. Sidney Burrus. E-mail the author

User rating (How does the rating system work?)
Ratings

Ratings allow you to judge the quality of modules. If other users have ranked the module then its average rating is displayed below. Ratings are calculated on a scale from one star (Poor) to five stars (Excellent).

How to rate a module

Hover over the star that corresponds to the rating you wish to assign. Click on the star to add your rating. Your rating should be based on the quality of the content. You must have an account and be logged in to rate content.

:
(0 ratings)

Note: Your browser may not currently support MathML. See our browser support page for additional details. You can always view the correct math in the PDF version.

This section develops the properties of the Butterworth filter which has as its basic concept a Taylor's series approximation to the desired frequency response. The measure of the approximation is the number of terms in the Taylor's series expansion of the actual frequency response that can be made equal to those of the desired frequency response. The optimal or best solution will have the maximum number of terms equal. The Taylor's series is a power series expansion of a function in the form of

F ( ω ) = K 0 + K 1 ω + K 2 ω 2 + K 3 ω 3 + F ( ω ) = K 0 + K 1 ω + K 2 ω 2 + K 3 ω 3 + (1)

where

K 0 = F ( 0 ) , K 1 = d F ( ω ) d ω | ω = 0 , K 2 = ( 1 / 2 ) d 2 F ( ω ) d ω 2 | ω = 0 , e t c . , K 0 = F ( 0 ) , K 1 = d F ( ω ) d ω | ω = 0 , K 2 = ( 1 / 2 ) d 2 F ( ω ) d ω 2 | ω = 0 , e t c . , (2)

with the coefficients of the Taylor's series being proportional to the various order derivatives of F(ω)F(ω) evaluated at ω=0ω=0. A basic characteristic of this approach is that the approximation is all performed at one point, i.e., at one frequency. The ability of this approach to give good results over a range of frequencies depends on the analytic properties of the response.

The general form for the squared-magnitude response is an even function of ωω and, therefore, is a function of ω2ω2 expressed as

F F ( j ω ) = d 0 + d 2 ω 2 + d 4 ω 4 + . . . + d 2 M ω 2 M c 0 + c 2 ω 2 + c 4 ω 4 + . . . c 2 N ω 2 N F F ( j ω ) = d 0 + d 2 ω 2 + d 4 ω 4 + . . . + d 2 M ω 2 M c 0 + c 2 ω 2 + c 4 ω 4 + . . . c 2 N ω 2 N (3)

In order to obtain a solution that is a lowpass filter, the Taylor's series expansion is performed around ω=0ω=0, requiring that FF(0)=1FF(0)=1 and that FF(j)=0FF(j)=0, (i.e., d0=c0d0=c0, N>MN>M, and c2N0c2N0). This is written as

F F ( j ω ) = 1 + E ( ω ) F F ( j ω ) = 1 + E ( ω ) (4)

Combining (Equation 3) and (Equation 4) gives

d 0 + d 2 ω 2 + + d 2 M w = c 0 + c 2 w + + c 2 N ω 2 N + E ( ω ) [ c 0 + c 2 ω + ] d 0 + d 2 ω 2 + + d 2 M w = c 0 + c 2 w + + c 2 N ω 2 N + E ( ω ) [ c 0 + c 2 ω + ] (5)

The best Taylor's approximation requires that FF(jω)FF(jω) and the desired ideal response have as many terms as possible equal in their Taylor's series expansion at a given frequency. For a lowpass filter, the expansion is around ω=0ω=0, and this requires E(ω)E(ω) have as few low-order ωω terms as possible. This is achieved by setting

c 0 = d 0 , c 2 = d 2 , c 2 M = d 2 M , c 2 M + 2 = 0 , c 2 N - 2 = 0 , c 2 N 0 c 0 = d 0 , c 2 = d 2 , c 2 M = d 2 M , c 2 M + 2 = 0 , c 2 N - 2 = 0 , c 2 N 0 (6)

Because the ideal response in the passband is a constant, the Taylor's series approximation is often called “maximally flat".

Equation (Equation 6) states that the numerator of the transfer function may be chosen arbitrarily. Then by setting the denominator coefficients of FF(s) equal to the numerator coefficients plus one higher-order term, an optimal Taylor's series approximation is achieved [2].

Since the numerator is arbitrary, its coefficients can be chosen for a Taylor's approximation to zero at ω=ω=. This is accomplished by setting d0=1d0=1 and all other d's equal zero. The resulting magnitude-squared function is[2]

F F ( j ω ) = 1 1 + c 2 N ω 2 N F F ( j ω ) = 1 1 + c 2 N ω 2 N (7)

The value of the constant c2Nc2N determines at which value of ωω the transition of passband to stopband occurs. For this development, it is normalized to c2N=1c2N=1, which causes the transition to occur at ω=1ω=1. This gives the simple form for what is called the Butterworth filter

F F ( j ω ) = 1 1 + ω 2 N F F ( j ω ) = 1 1 + ω 2 N (8)

This approximation is sometimes called “maximally flat" at both ω=0ω=0 and ω=ω=, since it is simultaneously a Taylor's series approximation to unity at ω=0ω=0 and to zero at ω=ω=. A graph of the resulting frequency response function is shown in Figure 1 for several NN.

Figure 1: Frequency Responses of the Butterworth Lowpass Filter Approximation
Figure 1 (figIIR3.png)

The characteristics of the normalized Butterworth filter frequency response are:

  • Very close to the ideal near ω=0ω=0 and ω=ω=,
  • Very smooth at all frequencies with a monotonic decrease from ω=0ω=0 to , and
  • Largest difference between the ideal and actual responses near the transition at ω=1ω=1 where |F(j1)|2=1/2|F(j1)|2=1/2.

Although not part of the approximation addressed, the phase curve is also very smooth.

An important feature of the Butterworth filter is the closed- form formula for the solution, F(s)F(s). From ((Reference)), the expression for FF(s)FF(s) may be determined as

F ( s ) F ( - s ) = 1 1 + ( - s 2 ) N F ( s ) F ( - s ) = 1 1 + ( - s 2 ) N (9)

This function has 2N2N poles evenly spaced around a unit radius circle and 2N2N zeros at infinity. The determination of F(s)F(s) is very simple. In order to have a stable filter, F(s)F(s) is selected to have the NN left-hand plane poles and NN zeros at infinity; F(-s)F(-s) will necessarily have the right-hand plane poles and the other N zeros at infinity. The location of these poles on the complex ss plane for N=1,2,3N=1,2,3, and 4 is shown in Figure 2.

Figure 2: Pole Locations for Analog Butterworth Filter Transfer Function on the Complex s Plane
Figure 2 (figIIR4.png)

Because of the geometry of the pole positions, simple formulas are easy to derive for the pole locations. If the real and imaginary parts of the pole location are denoted as

s = u + j w s = u + j w (10)

the locations of the NN poles are given by

u k = - cos ( k π / 2 N ) u k = - cos ( k π / 2 N ) (11)
ω k = sin ( k π / 2 N ) ω k = sin ( k π / 2 N ) (12)

for NN values of kk where

k = ± 1 , ± 3 , ± 5 , . . . , ± ( N - 1 ) for N even k = ± 1 , ± 3 , ± 5 , . . . , ± ( N - 1 ) for N even (13)
k = 0 , ± 2 , ± 4 , . . . , ± ( N - 1 ) for N odd k = 0 , ± 2 , ± 4 , . . . , ± ( N - 1 ) for N odd (14)

Because the coefficients of the numerator and denominator polynomials of F(s)F(s) are real, the roots occur in complex conjugate pairs. The conjugate pairs in (Equation 11,Equation 12) can be combined to be the roots of second-order polynomials so that for NN even, F(s)F(s) has the partially factored form of

F ( s ) = k 1 s 2 + 2 cos ( k π / 2 N ) s + 1 F ( s ) = k 1 s 2 + 2 cos ( k π / 2 N ) s + 1 (15)

for k=1,3,5,...,N-1k=1,3,5,...,N-1. For NN odd, F(s)F(s) has a single real pole and, therefore, the form

F ( s ) = 1 s + 1 k 1 s 2 + 2 cos ( k π / 2 N ) s + 1 F ( s ) = 1 s + 1 k 1 s 2 + 2 cos ( k π / 2 N ) s + 1 (16)

for k=2,4,6,,N-1k=2,4,6,,N-1

This is a convenient form for the cascade and parallel realizations discussed in elsewhere.

A single formula for the pole locations for both even and odd NN is

u k = - sin ( ( 2 k + 1 ) π / 2 N ) u k = - sin ( ( 2 k + 1 ) π / 2 N ) (17)
ω k = cos ( ( 2 k + 1 ) π / 2 N ) ω k = cos ( ( 2 k + 1 ) π / 2 N ) (18)

for NN values of kk where k=0,1,2,...,N-1k=0,1,2,...,N-1

One of the important features of the Butterworth filter design formulas is that the pole locations are found by independent calculations which do not depend on each other or on factoring a polynomial. A FORTRAN program which calculates these values is given in the appendix as Program 8. Mathworks has a powerful command for designing analog and digital Butterworth filters.

The classical form of the Butterworth filter given in (Equation 8) is discussed in many books [3], [1], [4], [5], [2]. The less well-known form given in (Equation 6) also has many useful applications [2]. If the frequency location of unwanted signals is known, the zeros of the transfer function given by the numerator can be set to best reject them. It is then possible to choose the pole locations so as to have a passband as flat as the classical Butterworth filter by using (Equation 6). Unfortunately, there are no formulas for the pole locations; therefore, the denominator polynomial must be factored.

Summary

This section has derived design procedures and formulas for a class of filter transfer functions that approximate the ideal desired frequency response by a Taylor's series. If the approximation is made at ω=0ω=0 and ω=ω=, the resulting filter is called a Butterworth filter and the response is called maximally-flat at zero and infinity. This filter has a very smooth frequency response and, although not explicitly designed for, has a smooth phase response. Simple formulas for the pole locations were derived and are implemented in the design program in the appendix of this book.

Butterworth Filter Design Procedures

This section considers the process of going from given specifications to use of the approximation results derived in the previous section. The Butterworth filter is the simplest of the four classical filters in that all the approximation effort is placed at two frequencies: ω=0ω=0 and ω=ω=. The transition from passband to stopband occurs at a normalized frequency of ω=1ω=1. Assuming that this transition frequency or bandedge can later be scaled to any desired frequency, the only parameter to be chosen in the design process is the order NN.

The filter specifications that are consistent with what is optimized in the Butterworth filter are the degree of “flatness" at ω=0ω=0 (DC) and at ω=ω=. The higher the order, the flatter the frequency response at these two points. Because of the analytic nature of rational functions, the flatter the response is at ω=0ω=0 and ω=ω=, the closer it stays to the desired response throughout the whole passband and stopband. An indirect consequence of the filter order is the slope of the response at the transition between pass and stopband. The slope of the squared-magnitude frequency response at ω=1ω=1 is

s = F F ' ( j 1 ) = - N / 2 s = F F ' ( j 1 ) = - N / 2 (19)

The effects of the increased flatness and increased transition slope of the frequency response as N increases are illustrated in (Reference).

In some cases specifications state the response must stay above or below a certain value over a given frequency band. Although this type of specification is more compatible with a Chebyshev error optimization, it is possible to design a Butterworth filter to meet the requirements. If the magnitude of the frequency response of the filter over the passband of 0<ω<ωP0<ω<ωP must remain between unity and GG, where ωp<1ωp<1 and G<1G<1, the required order is found by the smallest integer NN satisfying

N log ( ( 1 / G ) 2 - 1 ) 1 log ( ω p ) N log ( ( 1 / G ) 2 - 1 ) 1 log ( ω p ) (20)

This is illustrated in Figure 3 where |F||F| must remain above 0.9 for ωω up to 0.9, i.e., GG = 0.9 and ωpωp = 0.9. These requirements require an order of at least N=7N=7.

Figure 3: Passband Specifications for Designing a Butterworth Filter
Figure 3 (figIIR5.png)

If stopband performance is stated in the form of requiring that the response stay below a certain value for frequency above a certain value, i.e., |F|<G|F|<G for ω>ωsω>ωs, the order is determined by the same formula (Equation 20) with ωpωp replaced by ωsωs.

Note |F(j1)|=1/(2)|F(j1)|=1/(2) which is called the “half power" frequency because |F(j1)|2=1/2|F(j1)|2=1/2. This frequency is normalized to one for the theory but can be scaled to any value for applications.

Example. Design of a Butterworth Lowpass IIR Filter

To illustrate the calculations, a lowpass Butterworth filter is designed. It is desired that the frequency response stay above 0.8 for frequencies up to 0.9. The formula (Equation 20) for determining the order gives a value of 2.73; therefore, the order is three. The analytic function corresponding to the squared-magnitude frequency response in (Equation 9) is

| F ( j ω ) | 2 = 1 1 + ω 6 | F ( j ω ) | 2 = 1 1 + ω 6 (21)

The transfer function corresponding to the left-half-plane poles of F'(s) are calculated from (Equation 11) to give

F ( s ) = 1 ( s + 1 ) ( s + 0 . 5 + j 0 . 866 ) ( s + 0 . 5 - j 0 . 866 ) F ( s ) = 1 ( s + 1 ) ( s + 0 . 5 + j 0 . 866 ) ( s + 0 . 5 - j 0 . 866 ) (22)
F ( s ) = 1 ( s + 1 ) ( s 2 + s + 1 ) F ( s ) = 1 ( s + 1 ) ( s 2 + s + 1 ) (23)
F ( s ) = 1 s 3 + 2 s 2 + 2 s + 1 F ( s ) = 1 s 3 + 2 s 2 + 2 s + 1 (24)

The frequency response is obtained by setting s=jωs=jω which has a plot illustrated in Figure 1 for N=3N=3. The pole locations are the same as shown in Figure 2c.

References

  1. Oppenheim, A. V. and Schafer, R. W. (1999). Discrete-Time Signal Processing. (Second). [Earlier editions in 1975 and 1989]. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  2. Parks, T. W. and Burrus, C. S. (1987). Digital Filter Design. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  3. Rabiner, L. R. and Gold, B. (1975). Theory and Application of Digital Signal Processing. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  4. Taylor, F. J. (1983). Digital Filter Design Handbook. New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc.
  5. Valkenburg, M.E. Van. (1982). Analog Filter Design. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.

Content actions

Give Feedback:

E-mail the module author | Rate module ( How does the rating system work?)

Rating system

Ratings

Ratings allow you to judge the quality of modules. If other users have ranked the module then its average rating is displayed below. Ratings are calculated on a scale from one star (Poor) to five stars (Excellent).

How to rate a module

Hover over the star that corresponds to the rating you wish to assign. Click on the star to add your rating. Your rating should be based on the quality of the content. You must have an account and be logged in to rate content.

(0 ratings)

Download:

Add module to:

My Favorites (?)

'My Favorites' is a special kind of lens which you can use to bookmark modules and collections directly in Connexions. 'My Favorites' can only be seen by you, and collections saved in 'My Favorites' can remember the last module you were on. You need a Connexions account to use 'My Favorites'.

| A lens (?)

Definition of a lens

Lenses

A lens is a custom view of Connexions content. You can think of it as a fancy kind of list that will let you see Connexions through the eyes of organizations and people you trust.

What is in a lens?

Lens makers point to Connexions materials (modules and collections), creating a guide that includes their own comments and descriptive tags about the content.

Who can create a lens?

Any individual Connexions member, a community, or a respected organization.

What are tags? tag icon

Tags are descriptors added by lens makers to help label content, attaching a vocabulary that is meaningful in the context of the lens.

| External bookmarks