Let
EE size 12{E} {} be the event that the number shown on the die is an even number, and let
FF size 12{F} {} be the event that the number shown is greater than four.
The sample space
S=1,2,3,4,5,6S=1,2,3,4,5,6 size 12{S= left lbrace 1,2,3,4,5,6 right rbrace } {}. The event
E=2,4,6E=2,4,6 size 12{E= left lbrace 2,4,6 right rbrace } {}, and the event
F=5,6F=5,6 size 12{F= left lbrace 5,6 right rbrace } {}
We need to find
PE∪FPE∪F size 12{P left (E union F right )} {}.
Since
PE=3/6PE=3/6 size 12{P left (E right )=3/6} {}, and
PF=2/6PF=2/6 size 12{P left (F right )=2/6} {}, a student may say
PE∪F=3/6+2/6PE∪F=3/6+2/6 size 12{P left (E union F right )=3/6+2/6} {}. This will be incorrect because the element 6, which is in both
EE size 12{E} {} and
FF size 12{F} {} has been counted twice, once as an element of
EE size 12{E} {} and once as an element of
FF size 12{F} {}. In other words, the set
E∪FE∪F size 12{E union F} {} has only four elements and not five. Therefore,
PE∪F=4/6PE∪F=4/6 size 12{P left (E union F right )=4/6} {} and not
5/65/6 size 12{5/6} {} .
This can be illustrated by a Venn diagram.
The sample space
SS size 12{S} {}, the events
EE size 12{E} {} and
FF size 12{F} {}, and
E∩FE∩F size 12{E intersection F} {} are listed below.
S=1,2,3,4,5,6S=1,2,3,4,5,6 size 12{S= left lbrace 1,2,3,4,5,6 right rbrace } {},
E=2,4,6E=2,4,6 size 12{E= left lbrace 2,4,6 right rbrace } {},
F=5,6F=5,6 size 12{F= left lbrace 5,6 right rbrace } {}, and
E∩F=6E∩F=6 size 12{E intersection F= left lbrace 6 right rbrace } {}.
The above figure shows SS, EE, FF, and E∩FE∩F.
Finding the probability of E∪FE∪F, is the same as finding the probability that EE will happen, or FF will happen, or both will happen. If we count the number of elements n(E)n(E) in EE, and add to it the number of elements n(F)n(F) in FF, the points in both EE and FF are counted twice, once as elements of EE and once as elements of FF. Now if we subtract from the sum, n(E)+ n(F)n(E)+n(F), the number n(E∩F)n(E∩F), we remove the duplicity and get the correct answer. So as a rule,
n(E∪F)=n(E)+n(F)–n(E∩F)n(E∪F)=n(E)+n(F)–n(E∩F)
(16)By dividing the entire equation by n(S)n(S), we get
n(E∪F)n(S)=n(E)n(S)+n(F)n(S)–n(E∩F)n(S)n(E∪F)n(S)=n(E)n(S)+n(F)n(S)–n(E∩F)n(S)
(17)Since the probability of an event is the number of elements in that event divided by the number of all possible outcomes, we have
P(E∪F)=P(E)+P(F)–P(E∩F)P(E∪F)=P(E)+P(F)–P(E∩F)
(18)Applying the above for this example, we get
P(E∪F)=3/6+2/6-1/6=4/6P(E∪F)=3/6+2/6-1/6=4/6
(19)This is because, when we add P(E)P(E) and P(F)P(F), we have added P(E∩F)P(E∩F) twice. Therefore, we
must subtract P(E∩F)P(E∩F), once.
This gives us the general formula, called the Addition Rule, for finding the probability of the
union of two events. It states
P(E∪F)=P(E)+P(F)–P(E∩F)P(E∪F)=P(E)+P(F)–P(E∩F)
(20)If two events E and F are mutually exclusive, then E∩F=∅E∩F=∅ and P(E∩F)=0P(E∩F)=0, and we get
P(E∪F)=P(E)+P(F)P(E∪F)=P(E)+P(F)
(21)
"Reviewer's Comments: 'I recommend this book for undergraduates. The content is especially useful for those in finance, probability statistics, and linear programming. The course material is […]"