Explain, using words and equations, why the equation
x
2
=
–1
x
2
=–1 has no answer, but
x
3
=
–1
x
3
=–1 does.
OK, so now we are going to use our imaginations. (Didn’t think we were allowed to do that in math class, did you?) Suppose there were an answer to
x
2
=
–1
x
2
=–1? Obviously it wouldn’t be a number that we are familiar with (such as 5,
-
3
4
-
3
4
, or
π
π). So, let’s just give it a new name:
ii, because it’s imaginary. What would it be like?
The definition of the imaginary number
i
i is that it is the square root of
–1
–1:
i
=
−1i=−1 size 12{ sqrt { - 1} } {} or, equivalently,
i
2
=
–1
i
2
=–1
Based on that definition, answer the following questions. In each case, don’t just guess—give a good mathematical reason why the answer should be what you say it is!
What is
i
(
–i
)
i(–i)? (*Remember that
–i
–i means
–1
×
i
–1×i.)
What is
(
–i
)
2
(–i
)
2
?
What is
(
3
i
)
2
(3i
)
2
?
What is
(
–3
i
)
2
(–3i
)
2
?
What is
2i22i2 size 12{ left ( sqrt {2} `i right ) rSup { size 8{2} } } {}?
What is
2i22i2 size 12{ left ( sqrt {2i} right ) rSup { size 8{2} } } {}?
What is
−25−25 size 12{ sqrt { - "25"} } {}?
What is
−3−3 size 12{ sqrt { - 3} } {}?
What is
−8−8 size 12{ sqrt { - 8} } {}?
Fill in the following table.
Table 1
| i1i1 |
|
| i2i2 |
|
| i3i3 |
|
| i4i4 |
|
| i5i5 |
|
| i6i6 |
|
| i7i7 |
|
| i8i8 |
|
| i9i9 |
|
| i10i10 |
|
| i11i11 |
|
| i12i12 |
|
Fill in the following table.
Table 2
|
i
100
i
100
|
|
|
i
101
i
101
|
|
|
i
102
i
102
|
|
|
i
103
i
103
|
|
|
i
104
i
104
|
|
Now let’s have some more fun!
(
3
+
4
i
)
2
=
(3+4i
)
2
=
(
3
+
4
i
)
(
3
–
4
i
)
=
(3+4i)(3–4i)=
1i2=1i2 size 12{ left ( { {1} over {i} } right ) rSup { size 8{2} } } {}=
Simplify the fraction
1i1i size 12{ { {1} over {i} } } {}.
Multiply the top and bottom by
i
i.
Square your answer to #16. Did you get the same answer you got to #15? Why or why not?
Simplify the fraction
13+2i13+2i size 12{ { {1} over {3+2i} } } {}.
Multiply the top and bottom by
3
–
2
i
3–2i.
"This is the "main" book in Kenny Felder's "Advanced Algebra II" series. This text was created with a focus on 'doing' and 'understanding' algebra concepts rather than simply hearing about them in […]"