Skip to content Skip to navigation

Connexions

You are here: Home » Content » Assessing Teacher Performance

Navigation

Recently Viewed

This feature requires Javascript to be enabled.
 

Assessing Teacher Performance

Module by: Theodore Creighton. E-mail the author

Class Objectives

  • To determine the rationale for employee performance evaluation.
  • To identify the barriers to teacher evaluation.
  • To develop strategies and steps for helping struggling teachers.

Assignments

  • Re-read Hoerr's Chapter 6, Evaluating Teacher Growth.
  • Supplemental reading below (Teacher Evaluation and the Use of Technology).
  • Print off a hard copy of Teacher Evaluation Report and Performance Indicators (Rebore, 2007) CLICK HERE and bring to class.
  • Construct a written Memorandum for documentation purposes on a personnel matter. CLICK HERE to access Guidelines for writing the memoranduum.

Note:

The following is a chapter in The Principal as Technology Leader (2003) authored by Theodore Creighton, and published by Corwin Press. Though an apparent theme is technology implementation, this chapter is about "the assessment of teacher performance," and is applicable to all aspects of the role of the principal in the administration of personnel. As you read and reflect upon this material, I encourage you to substitute any of the many issues you deal with in your schools for the topic of technology implementation.

Importance of Assessing Teacher Performance

The tasks and responsibilities of a school principal, though often daunting, certainly include the assurance that "excellence in teaching" is the centerpiece of a division's agenda. Supervision of the instructional process is the "quality control" element of student learning, and teacher evaluation is an important element of that quality control, as well as an important element of of effective leadership by the principal. When a teacher is performing in a marginally effective manner and the principla does not confront the teacher with the problem, then the principal is also performing in a marginal manner (Smith, 1998). We currently appraise the performance of teachers for the following reasons, among others:

  • Appraisal fosters the self-development of each teacher.
  • Appraisal helps to identify a variety of tasks that the teacher is capable of performing.
  • Appraisal helps to identify staff development needs.
  • Appraisal helps to improve performance.
  • Appraisal helps to determine the placement, transfer, or promotion of a teacher.
  • Appraisal helps to determine if a teacher should be retained in the division or district. (Rebore, 2007, p. 221)

Evaluating Technology Use in the Classroom

I do not argue with our commitment to the appropriate use of effective teaching appraisal practices. What seems to be missing, however, is the inclusion of the same rigorous attention to evaluating technology use in the classroom. In addition, many educators mistakenly believe that effective technology integration correlates with how much hardware and software is available in the classroom and/or our labs. I will go even further and suggest that even the "use" of available technology by all students does not necessarily translate to effective technology integration. It's reallly about how the teacher uses technology to support clearly defined learning objectives.

Consider this: When we visit a classroom to observe a language arts lesson, do we measure effective teaching and learning solely by the number of language arts textbooks available and whether or not teachers and students are using them? Visiting an algebra lesson, are we staisfed with the teacher's performance if students are using the adopted text along with the new calculators purchased by the district? Certainly not, Why? Curriculum and learning objectives are in place for our language arts and math curriculums, and both teachers and principals are aware of them. I am not convinced that we evaluate the effective use of technology with the same rigorous kind of standards and learning objectives. Technology that does not advance student learning has little value in the classroom, and i suggest even "gets in the way" of other types of learning. Technology linked to standards and agreed-on learning objectives can help all students achieve at high levels.

So What Do I Look For?

If technology integration is not about hardware and software or even necessarlity the use of it, then what is it and what do I look for in a classroom observation? First of all, let's look at the research and utilize some resources already available to us. No need to reinvent the wheel.

CLICK HERE to read the rest of Teacher Evaluation and the Use of Technology, along with the NCREL Learning and Technology Framework.

Content actions

Download module as:

PDF | EPUB (?)

What is an EPUB file?

EPUB is an electronic book format that can be read on a variety of mobile devices.

Downloading to a reading device

For detailed instructions on how to download this content's EPUB to your specific device, click the "(?)" link.

| More downloads ...

Add module to:

My Favorites (?)

'My Favorites' is a special kind of lens which you can use to bookmark modules and collections. 'My Favorites' can only be seen by you, and collections saved in 'My Favorites' can remember the last module you were on. You need an account to use 'My Favorites'.

| A lens I own (?)

Definition of a lens

Lenses

A lens is a custom view of the content in the repository. You can think of it as a fancy kind of list that will let you see content through the eyes of organizations and people you trust.

What is in a lens?

Lens makers point to materials (modules and collections), creating a guide that includes their own comments and descriptive tags about the content.

Who can create a lens?

Any individual member, a community, or a respected organization.

What are tags? tag icon

Tags are descriptors added by lens makers to help label content, attaching a vocabulary that is meaningful in the context of the lens.

| External bookmarks