An important feature of Besov spaces is that they admit equivalent characterization by
multiresolution approximation properties and by wavelet decompositions.
Here we use the following standard
notation (see [3] or [2] for a general treatment): if ff is function
we denote by PjfPjf its projection onto the space VjVj,
and by Qjf=Pj+1f-PjfQjf=Pj+1f-Pjf its projection onto the detail space WjWj.
The multiscale decomposition of ff writes
f
=
P
0
f
+
∑
j
≥
0
Q
j
f
.
f
=
P
0
f
+
∑
j
≥
0
Q
j
f
.
(1)
The projectors PjPj and QjQj can be further expressed in terms of biorthogonal
scaling functions and wavelets bases:
P
j
f
:
=
∑
|
λ
|
=
j
〈
f
,
ϕ
˜
λ
〉
ϕ
λ
and
Q
j
f
:
=
∑
|
λ
|
=
j
〈
f
,
ψ
˜
λ
〉
ψ
λ
.
P
j
f
:
=
∑
|
λ
|
=
j
〈
f
,
ϕ
˜
λ
〉
ϕ
λ
and
Q
j
f
:
=
∑
|
λ
|
=
j
〈
f
,
ψ
˜
λ
〉
ψ
λ
.
(2)
Here we use the simplified notation ϕλϕλ with “|λ|=j|λ|=j”
meaning that the functions are picked at resolution jj. In the
case where
Ω=RdΩ=Rd,
these
have the general from ϕλ(x):=ϕj,k(x):=2dj/2ϕ(2jx-k)ϕλ(x):=ϕj,k(x):=2dj/2ϕ(2jx-k),
bur for a general domain
Ω=RdΩ=Rd
proper adaptations
of these bases need to be done near the boundary. We can therefore write
f
=
∑
d
λ
ψ
λ
,
d
λ
:
=
〈
f
,
ψ
˜
λ
〉
,
f
=
∑
d
λ
ψ
λ
,
d
λ
:
=
〈
f
,
ψ
˜
λ
〉
,
(3)
where we include in this sum the wavelets at all levels j≥0j≥0 and
we incorporate the scaling function ϕλϕλ at the first level |λ|=0|λ|=0.
Under certain assumptions that we shall discuss below, it is known that
the Besov norm ∥f∥Bp,qs∥f∥Bp,qs is equivalent to
∥
P
0
f
∥
L
p
+
∥
(
2
s
j
∥
f
-
P
j
f
∥
L
p
)
j
≥
0
∥
ℓ
q
,
∥
P
0
f
∥
L
p
+
∥
(
2
s
j
∥
f
-
P
j
f
∥
L
p
)
j
≥
0
∥
ℓ
q
,
(4)
or to
∥
P
0
f
∥
L
p
+
∥
(
2
s
j
∥
Q
j
f
∥
L
p
)
j
≥
0
∥
ℓ
q
.
∥
P
0
f
∥
L
p
+
∥
(
2
s
j
∥
Q
j
f
∥
L
p
)
j
≥
0
∥
ℓ
q
.
(5)
Using the equivalence
∥Qjf∥Lp∼2(d/2-d/p)j∥(dλ)|λ|=j∥ℓp∥Qjf∥Lp∼2(d/2-d/p)j∥(dλ)|λ|=j∥ℓp
at each level to prove a third
equivalent norm in
terms of the wavelet coefficients:
∥
(
2
s
j
2
(
d
/
2
-
d
/
p
)
j
∥
(
d
λ
)
|
λ
|
=
j
∥
ℓ
p
)
j
≥
0
∥
ℓ
q
.
∥
(
2
s
j
2
(
d
/
2
-
d
/
p
)
j
∥
(
d
λ
)
|
λ
|
=
j
∥
ℓ
p
)
j
≥
0
∥
ℓ
q
.
(6)
These equivalences mean that the modulus of smoothness
ωn(f,2-j)Lpωn(f,2-j)Lp
in the definition of Bp,qsBp,qs
can be replaced either by ∥f-Pjf∥Lp∥f-Pjf∥Lp or by ∥Qjf∥Lp∥Qjf∥Lp.
Their validity requires that
the spaces VjVj satisfy the following two assumptions:
- The VjVj must satisfy an approximation property that takes the form of a
direct estimate
∥f-Pjf∥Lp≤Cωn(f,2-j)Lp.∥f-Pjf∥Lp≤Cωn(f,2-j)Lp.
(7)
Such an estimate ensures that a smooth function will have a fast rate of
approximation.
- They must also satisfy smoothness properties that takes the form of an inverse estimate
ωn(fj,t)Lp≤C[min(1,t2j)]n∥fj∥Lp if fj∈Vj.ωn(fj,t)Lp≤C[min(1,t2j)]n∥fj∥Lp if fj∈Vj.
(8)
Such an estimate takes into account the smoothness of the spaces VjVj: it
ensures
that a function that is approximated at a sufficiently fast rate rate by
these spaces
should also have some smoothness.
One can show that the direct estimate is satisfied if and only if
all polynomials up to order n-1n-1
can be written as combinations of the scaling functions ϕλϕλ in VjVj,
or equivalently if the dual wavelets ψ˜λψ˜λ
have nn vanishing moments. On the other hand, the inverse estimate
requires that the scaling functions ϕλϕλ that generates VjVj are
smooth in the sense of belonging to Wn,pWn,p.
Note that the direct estimate immediately implies that the
expression Equation 4 is less than ∥f∥Bp,qs∥f∥Bp,qs. A more refined
mechanism, using the
inverse estimate (as well as some discrete Hardy inequalities) is used to
prove the full equivalence between ∥f∥Bp,qs∥f∥Bp,qs and Equation 5 or Equation 6.
We refer to chapter III in [2] for a detailed proof of these results.
These equivalences show that
the convergence rate N-t/dN-t/d (N= dim (Vj)N= dim (Vj))
can be achieved by the linear
multiscale approximation process f↦Pff↦Pf, if and only if the function has roughly
“tt derivatives
in LpLp”.
-
Adams, R. (1975). Sobolev Spaces. Academic Press.
-
Cohen, A. (2003). Numerical Analysis of Wavelet Methods. Elsevier.
-
Daubechies, Ingrid. (1992). Ten Lectures on Wavelets. [Notes from the 1990 CBMS-NSF Conference on Wavelets and Applications at Lowell, MA]. Philadelphia, PA: SIAM.
-
DeVore, R. (1998). Nonlinear Approximation. Acta Numerica.
-
R. DeVore, B. Jawerth, and V. Popov,. (1992). Compression of wavelet decompositions. American Journal of Math, 114, 737-285.
-
H. Triebel. (1983). Theory of Function Spaces. Birkhauser.
"This is an introduction to fractional measures of smoothness for functions via Besov spaces that generalize the classical Sobolev smoothness spaces."