Skip to content Skip to navigation

Connexions

You are here: Home » Content » Summary - Leading a University Open Source Project

Navigation

Lenses

What is a lens?

Definition of a lens

Lenses

A lens is a custom view of Connexions content. You can think of it as a fancy kind of list that will let you see Connexions through the eyes of organizations and people you trust.

What is in a lens?

Lens makers point to Connexions materials (modules and collections), creating a guide that includes their own comments and descriptive tags about the content.

Who can create a lens?

Any individual Connexions member, a community, or a respected organization.

What are tags? tag icon

Tags are descriptors added by lens makers to help label content, attaching a vocabulary that is meaningful in the context of the lens.

This content is ...

In these lenses

  • FOSS display tagshide tags

    This module is included inLens: Open Source
    By: Ross GardlerAs a part of collection:"The Impact of Open Source Software on Education"

    Comments:

    "General content on open source"

    Click the "FOSS" link to see all content selected in this lens.

    Click the tag icon tag icon to display tags associated with this content.

Recently Viewed

This feature requires Javascript to be enabled.

Tags

(What is a tag?)

These tags come from the endorsement, affiliation, and other lenses that include this content.

Summary - Leading a University Open Source Project

Module by: Ken Udas. E-mail the author

User rating (How does the rating system work?)
Ratings

Ratings allow you to judge the quality of modules. If other users have ranked the module then its average rating is displayed below. Ratings are calculated on a scale from one star (Poor) to five stars (Excellent).

How to rate a module

Hover over the star that corresponds to the rating you wish to assign. Click on the star to add your rating. Your rating should be based on the quality of the content. You must have an account and be logged in to rate content.

:
(0 ratings)

Summary: Summary of contribution by Gary Schwartz who posted from the perspective of a open source project manager.

Leading a University Open Source Project,” the fifteenth installment of the Impact of Open Source Software Series, was posted on October 17th, 2007, by Gary Schwartz who currently serves as Director of Communications & Middleware Technologies at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute and is also serving as project manager and spokesperson for Bedework, the open source, enterprise calendaring system for Higher Education. Thanks David for a great posting!

In his posting Gary starts off by providing some background on the Bedework project highlighting its roots in University of Washington’s UWCalendar project. Much of the posting was flowed from the project requirements, which included:

  1. Implementation is consonant with our core competencies in Java/J2EE programming, XML, and web interface design and construction.
  2. Open source – no license or usage fees
  3. The ability to distribute administration and control to the event owners themselves is crucial in a university environment.
  4. The code must provide complete, well-defined APIs which are scrupulously honored, with no local dependencies (authentication, policies, etc.) The packaging must allow competent professionals to easily install the package and to get a demo version running with minimal confusion and frustration.

Gary treats these requirements in terms of how well they were articulated and the challenges they posed the organization. For example, he talks a bit about struggles with IP issues (letting go of concerns around commercial activity), establishing a development community, managing competing demands, and meeting release dates. Gray wraps up the posing by indicating that the Bedework team has benefited from the relationships developed with other institutions.

Comments

Gary’s posting is quite well developed and has a lot of content. It served as a great platform to strike at the theme of the Series, which is the impact that OSS and OER has on higher education. The comments centered around the impact of the Bedework project on RPI, as opposed to larger impact on education or the functioning of higher education.

Thanks again to Gary, for his interesting and insightful post and responses, and Pat for making this a great exchange, and other folks who have been reading along. Please join in again on October 31st when Michael Feldstein posts with perspectives. The schedule for the series can be found on WikiEducator.

Content actions

Give Feedback:

E-mail the module author | Rate module ( How does the rating system work?)

Rating system

Ratings

Ratings allow you to judge the quality of modules. If other users have ranked the module then its average rating is displayed below. Ratings are calculated on a scale from one star (Poor) to five stars (Excellent).

How to rate a module

Hover over the star that corresponds to the rating you wish to assign. Click on the star to add your rating. Your rating should be based on the quality of the content. You must have an account and be logged in to rate content.

(0 ratings)

Download:

Module PDF

Add module to:

My Favorites (?)

'My Favorites' is a special kind of lens which you can use to bookmark modules and collections directly in Connexions. 'My Favorites' can only be seen by you, and collections saved in 'My Favorites' can remember the last module you were on. You need a Connexions account to use 'My Favorites'.

| A lens (?)

Definition of a lens

Lenses

A lens is a custom view of Connexions content. You can think of it as a fancy kind of list that will let you see Connexions through the eyes of organizations and people you trust.

What is in a lens?

Lens makers point to Connexions materials (modules and collections), creating a guide that includes their own comments and descriptive tags about the content.

Who can create a lens?

Any individual Connexions member, a community, or a respected organization.

What are tags? tag icon

Tags are descriptors added by lens makers to help label content, attaching a vocabulary that is meaningful in the context of the lens.

| External bookmarks