Skip to content Skip to navigation Skip to collection information

Connexions

You are here: Home » Content » Choral Techniques » The Twentieth Century And Early Twenty-First Century

Navigation

Table of Contents

Recently Viewed

This feature requires Javascript to be enabled.
 

The Twentieth Century And Early Twenty-First Century

Module by: Gordon Lamb. E-mail the author

Summary: This module represents a discussion of the music of the 20th century and of the early 21st century. There are divergent compositional streams happening concurrently. The conductor must learn to grasp the essence of the new score, with its possible new notation and determine how best to present it to the choir and teach it through rehearsals to performance. Suggestions are made concerning all aspects of the music and several musical scores are suggested for study.

THE TWENTIETH CENTURY

The divergent musical styles of the twentieth century and the early twenty-first century include impressionism, neo-classicism, post-romanticism, pan-diatonicism, twelve-tone, electronic, and aleatory (indeterminacy). Composers at the end of the nineteenth century realized that Romanticism had reached its peak and that new directions were necessary if music was to continue to grow. The reader is referred to discussions of these various styles in several books listed at the end of this chapter. This discussion is directed toward the general performance considerations of twentieth-century and contemporary music.

Characteristics of twentieth-century music include:

1. Numerous meter changes

2. Exploration beyond limits of tonality

3. Pointillism

4. Nonsinging vocal sounds

5. Acceptance of any sound source as valid

6. Composers renew interest in small ensembles

7. Complex scores

8. A new music notation

9. Aleatoric composition (performance is dependent on chance)

10. Increasing demands on the vocalist

11. Increased dissonance (the term dissonance becomes obsolete in the discussion of new music after the middle of the century)

12. Growing number of choral works demanding limited staging andlighting or similar effects

RHYTHM AND TEMPO

Use of rhythm in twentieth-century music is varied. Composers strive to achieve a variety of rhythmic accents and groupings. Intricate rhythm patterns are usual. Twentieth-century composers use rhythm as a means of achieving tension. Many composers utilize changing meters to achieve rhythmic variety and excitement. Choral composers often use this technique in an attempt to create a musical inflection of the text. Constant meter changes are not unusual. Each use must be examined individually; no one solution can be applied to all occurrences. The conductor must determine the simplest and most direct method of realizing the intention of the composer.

Tempo is related to the musical style and mood of the text. Extremes in tempo are frequently found. Tempo changes are often abrupt and require skillful handling by the conductor. Composers mark their scores carefully and use metronome markings to indicate the tempo they prefer. A conductor should respect these markings and consider them as guidelines to their performance tempos. Of course, he must also consider the performance hall acoustics, ensemble size, and performers.

TEXTURE

Many and varied textures are demanded in twentieth-century choral music. There has been an interest in chamber choirs by composers. This is both a reaction against the gigantic forces used by the later nineteenth-century composers, and a practical consideration utilizing smaller groups to perform complex scores. Each score must be examined carefully regarding texture. Impressionistic and post-romantic music usually involve a vertical structure whose harmonic movement is fluid, with an emphasis on harmony and beauty of tone. Twelve-tone scores are more horizontal and less emphasis is placed on individual chords. Its dissonance demands a tone quality with a minimal vibrato. Additionally, the singers must be thoroughly skilled in the singing of intervals to learn and perform this repertoire.

Twentieth-century composers often utilize a number of textures and moods within one work, changing both texture and mood often. Wide variations in tone quality will be necessary to make these changes effective. Although most of the choral music performed is only mildly dissonant, more avant-garde music is finding its way into performance halls. Electronic music is not really new, but music for prepared tape and chorus has only recently been accepted by most choral conductors (and performed by only a modest percentage of those).

Aleatoric (indeterminate or chance) pieces are performed by the more adventurous conductor. Works that are considered avant-garde are likely to require anything from a normal singing tone to whistling, whispering, and other assorted vocal sounds.

More textural possibilities exist today than ever before. The choral conductor may find music for chorus and many instrumental combinations that substantially expand the texture. It is the conductor's responsibility to understand the tonal and textural requirements of each work and to determine whether or not his ensemble can meet these requirements. Not every choir or conductor will be able to successfully meet the performance requirements of each work.

DYNAMICS

The dynamic range is even wider than that of the Romantic period since it now includes whispering, singing as loud as one can, and even yelling. Sudden changes in dynamics are also more numerous than ever before. Many works even require a dynamic scheme that changes on every count of the measure for several measures. It is quite usual to find different dynamic indications in different parts on the same passage. For example, the composer may wish the tenors and sopranos to be prominent and will mark them forte while the bass is marked mezzoforte and the alto, piano. Although this type of dynamic scheme is not entirely new, it is used more frequently by twentieth-century composers.

TONE QUALITY

Twentieth-century choral music requires many different tone qualities. Less than other periods, no one choral tone will suffice. It can be said that a tone with a minimal vibrato is often used because of the numerous occurrences of small intervals and the overall dissonance of the music. It should be said that a tone without vibrato should be used when specifically requested by the composer. A tone without vibrato use sparingly and momentarily for specific artistic and composer demanded instances is quite accaptable. When a "straight tone" is used indiscriminately the choral tone becomes lifeless and uninteresting. A vibrato in the singing voice is quite natural and creates a buoyancy and virility in the tone otherwise absent.

Specific types of tone quality are occasionally requested by composers. Conductors will find such requests as "with a full, rich tone," "sing with a thin, white tone," or simply "senza vibrato" in scores. This is a result of a composer wishing to achieve a certain sonority usually prompted by the text.

SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS OF NEW MUSIC

Since the 1950s, composers have incorporated aleatoric aspects into their compositions. Many works are published that combine traditional and non-traditional notation. The problems that face the conductor of much new music are:

1. Determining the meaning of the notation (when nontraditional)

2. Convincing the choir that the new sounds are valid musical choices

3. Achieving a thread of continuity through a work that utilizes several twentieth-century techniques

Each new work must be thoroughly examined to understand the composer's intent. This is true of all music, of course. Every new work may have its own particular notation unlike any other piece, even another by the same composer. New notation follows only such rules as the composer may apply to a specific work. There is no standard, although a few notational features are being used consistently by a number of composers to mean the same thing. This use is approaching a standard and one will eventually be set. Usually composers place an explanation of their notation in a foreword to the score. Performance suggestions are likely to be included.

It is most important that the conductor have the complete confidence of his choir in order to successfully perform aleatoric music. The conductor must also accept the music as being valid and be willing to work as hard on that music as he would on any traditional piece. The rehearsal planning will be different but nonetheless important. (See chapter two for a discussion of score analysis of aleatoric music.)

Music for prepared tape and choir has become plentiful recently and has received a number of performances. As with all music, the quality of these works varies and conductors must judge each work on its own merits. Several works will no doubt become "standard" pieces in the choral repertoire while others will be discarded. More of these works were composed in the 1970', 1980s' and early 1990's than now, it seems at least by the performances. However, there are composers experimenting with a variety of electronic means, voices and other instruments.

Conductors should be cautioned about use of tape and voices together. Unless a certain quality is specified by the composer, a full singing tone should be employed. The tone should be vibrant, containing a minimal amount of vibrato, and not be an attempt to mimic the electronic sounds. The composer is aware of the natural qualities of the human voice and wishes to capitalize on the difference between the voice and the taped sounds. He does not expect one to sound like the other, except where carefully specified.

Another important consideration is the quality of playback equipment. In general, the quality of playback equipment has improved greatly, is more diverse with excellent systems while the price has diminished.

CHORAL COMPOSERS OF THE TWENTIETH CENTURY

Table 1
Claude Debussy (1862-1918) Gerald Finzi (1901-1956)
Frederick Delius (1862-1934) William Walton (1902-)
Ralph Vaughan Williams (1872-1958) Louise Talma (1906-1996)
Gustav von Hoist (1874-1934) Paul Creston (1906-1986)
Charles Ives (1874-1954) Normand Lockwood (1906-)
Martin Shaw (1875-1958) Hugo Distler (1908-1942)
Ernest Bloch (1880-1959) Samuel Barber (1910-1981)
Healey Willan (1880-1969) William Schuman (1910-1992)
Bela Bartok (1881-1945) Benjamin Britten (1913-1976)
Zoltan Kodaly (1882-1967) Norman Dello Joio (1913-)
Igor Stravinsky (1882-1971) Irving Fine (1914-1962)
Heitor Villa-Lobos (1887-1959) Gail Kubik (1914-1984)
Ernst Toch (1887-1964) Vincent Persichetti (1915-1987)
Arthur Honegger (1892-1955) Leonard Bernstein (1918-1990)
Darius Milhaud (1892-1974) Paul Fetler (1920-)
Paul Hindemith (1895-1963) William Bergsma (1921-1994)
Leo Sowerby (1895-1968) Lukas Foss (1922-)
Carl Orff (1895-1982) Daniel Pinkham (1923-2006)
Howard Hanson (1896-1981) Leslie Bassett (1923-)
Virgil Thomson (1896-1989) Emma Lou Diemer (1927-)
Roy Harris (1898-1979) Alun Hodinott (1929–)
Francis Poulenc (1899-1963) Kennet Leighton (1929-1988)
Carlos Chavez (1899-1978) Morten Lauridsen (1943-)
Randall Thompson (1899-1984) Keith Jarrett (1945-)
Sven Lekberg (1899-1984) John Rutter (1945 –)
Aaron Copland (1900-1990) Libby Larsen (1950-)
Jean Berger (1901-2002) Eric Whitacre (1970-)

SUGGESTED WORKS FOR STUDY

Collect (with electronic tape), Bassett (World Library of Sacred Music) Nine Choral Fragments (Aleatory), Childs (Keynote Music Co.) All the Ways of a Man, Nystedt (Augsburg Pub. Hse.) Carols of Death, Schuman (G. Schirmer) Rejoice in the Lamb, Britten (Boosey and Hawkes) Christmas Cantata, Pinkham (Robert King Music Co.) Aleatory Psalm, Lamb (World Library of Sacred Music) Magic! Magic! Magic!, Kubik

Collection Navigation

Content actions

Download module as:

Add:

Collection to:

My Favorites (?)

'My Favorites' is a special kind of lens which you can use to bookmark modules and collections. 'My Favorites' can only be seen by you, and collections saved in 'My Favorites' can remember the last module you were on. You need an account to use 'My Favorites'.

| A lens I own (?)

Definition of a lens

Lenses

A lens is a custom view of the content in the repository. You can think of it as a fancy kind of list that will let you see content through the eyes of organizations and people you trust.

What is in a lens?

Lens makers point to materials (modules and collections), creating a guide that includes their own comments and descriptive tags about the content.

Who can create a lens?

Any individual member, a community, or a respected organization.

What are tags? tag icon

Tags are descriptors added by lens makers to help label content, attaching a vocabulary that is meaningful in the context of the lens.

| External bookmarks

Module to:

My Favorites (?)

'My Favorites' is a special kind of lens which you can use to bookmark modules and collections. 'My Favorites' can only be seen by you, and collections saved in 'My Favorites' can remember the last module you were on. You need an account to use 'My Favorites'.

| A lens I own (?)

Definition of a lens

Lenses

A lens is a custom view of the content in the repository. You can think of it as a fancy kind of list that will let you see content through the eyes of organizations and people you trust.

What is in a lens?

Lens makers point to materials (modules and collections), creating a guide that includes their own comments and descriptive tags about the content.

Who can create a lens?

Any individual member, a community, or a respected organization.

What are tags? tag icon

Tags are descriptors added by lens makers to help label content, attaching a vocabulary that is meaningful in the context of the lens.

| External bookmarks