# OpenStax-CNX

You are here: Home » Content » Recognition

### Recently Viewed

This feature requires Javascript to be enabled.

# Recognition

Module by: John Bosco. E-mail the author

Summary: This chapter is about one of the three stages in the process making a law - the Recognition stage.

## Introduction


The process of making a law can be broken down into three separate and distinct stages. In this chapter, we will study the stage of the process of making a law called RECOGNITION. RECOGNITION deals with the desires of a lawmaker with regard to a Recipient receiving conduct. In contrast, INTRUSION deals with the desires of a lawmaker with regard to a Source doing conduct and FORMATION deals with the desires of a Lawmaker with regard to the Conduct itself.

## The Factual Focus of the Lawmaker during Recognition is the Recipient receiving Conduct


From her perch at the acme of The Triangle of Law, a Lawmaker despises the facts at its base as a flow of conduct from Source to Recipient in Circumstances. During RECOGNITION, the focus of a lawmaker is upon the Recipient receiving conduct. It is not upon the Conduct itself or the Source doing conduct. This focus creates a relationship between the Lawmaker and the Recipient. It is one of the three legal relationships in A Unified Theory of a Law. This relationship is depicted graphically as one of the three legs of The Triangle of Law.

## The Opinion of the Lawmaker at the Recognition Stage


During RECOGNITION, a lawmaker forms any of three opinions about a flow of conduct from Source to Recipient in Circumstances:
1. a Lawmaker likes the conduct and wants the Recipient to receive the conduct
2. a Lawmaker is indifferent to the conduct and does not care whether or not the Recipient receives the conduct, or
3. a Lawmaker dislikes the conduct and does not want the Recipient to receive the conduct.

Only these three opinions are available to a lawmaker during RECOGNITION. A lawmaker must pick one and reject two.

## Binding a command or a permission to a Recipient receiving conduct


After a lawmaker forms an opinion during the RECOGNITION stage of the process of making a law, the lawmaker must externalize the opinion and communicate it to the citizenry. This is done when the lawmaker binds the command or permission picked at the FORMATION stage of the process of making a law to the Recipient. A lawmaker binds a command or a permission to a Recipient when a Lawmaker hands a Recipient either of two tokens: 1) a right or 2) a no-right. Picture a General pinning a medal onto the tunic of a soldier. A right and a no-right are the two tokens of RECOGNITION.


A lawmaker binds a command to a Recipient by giving the Recipient a right.


A lawmaker binds a permission to a Recipient by giving the Recipient a no-right.


Unless and until a Lawmaker binds a token to a Recipient receiving conduct, the Recipient remains in the factual world. Only by binding a token to a Recipient is the Recipient transported to the legal world.


Hence, the vocabulary of RECOGNITION consists of a mere two words coupled with the polarities of conduct. They are sufficient to express the three permutations available to a lawmaker at the RECOGNITION stage:
1. a Lawmaker binds a right to affirmative (a/k/a on) conduct to a Recipient,
2. a Lawmaker binds a no-right to either affirmative (a/k/a on) conduct or to negative (a/k/a off) conduct to a Recipient, or
3. a Lawmaker binds a right to negative (a/k/a off) conduct to a Recipient.

## The Metaphor of Recognition


A metaphor has evolved to help us understand the three permutations available to a lawmaker during the RECOGNITION stage of the process of making a law. The Metaphor is known as Standing.


A Recipient seems visible to a Lawmaker who holds the opinion that she wants the Recipient to receive the conduct or the opinion that she does not want the Recipient to receive the conduct. Because a Recipient seems visible, the Recipient is said to have standing.


On the other hand, a Recipient seems invisible to a Lawmaker who holds the opinion that she does not care whether or not the Recipient receives the conduct. Because a Recipient seems invisible, the Recipient is said to lack standing.


Hence, standing is a useful metaphor. A command is a law with standing; a permission is a law without standing. A right indicates standing is present. A no-right indicates standing is absent.


Standing, in contrast to weight, is visual not tactile. Standing seems; weight feels. Moreover, our grammar is geared to weight rather than standing and, alas, we are all prisoners of our grammar. There are no intrinsic grammatical structures in our language that express standing. There are no shalls or mays that serve as clues. Hence, it is easier to talk from the perspective of a source rather than a recipient.

## Recognition and the Periodic Table of the Elements of a Law


RECOGNITION occupies three of the nine cells of the three by three grid known as The Periodic Table of the Elements of a Law. Cells A3, B3 and C3 found in Column 3 capture everything that occurs during the RECOGNITION stage of the process of making a law.

## Glossary

NO-RIGHT:
A no-right is one of the four tokens. It is usually bound to a Recipient. (But see, Extrapolation). It brings a Recipient from the factual world into the legal world. It indicates that a lawmaker does not care whether or not a Recipient receives conduct. It corresponds to a privilege on the INTRUSION side of the process of making a law. It indicates that standing is absent. A no-right indicates that a lawmaker has bound a permission to a Recipient instead of a command.
STANDING:
Standing is a metaphor that indicates whether or not a Recipient is visible to a Lawmaker. A visible Recipient has standing and has a right. An invisible Recipient lacks standing and has a no-right.
STANDING TOKEN HOLDER:
A standing token holder is a person - usually a Recipient receiving conduct - who is holding either a right or a no-right.
TOKEN:
A token is a word that symbolize a Lawmaker's desires with regard to a Source doing conduct and a Recipient receiving conduct. There are four (4) tokens: duty, privilege, right and no-right. To bind a command to a Source and Recipient, a Lawmaker "hands" a duty to the Source doing conduct and a right to the Recipient receiving conduct. To bind a permission to a Source doing conduct and a Recipient receiving conduct, the Lawmaker "hands" a privilege to the Source doing conduct and a no-right to the Recipient receiving conduct. Tokens are the means through which a Lawmaker accomplishes the binding of commands and permissions.
TOKENHOLDER:
A token holder is a person who holds one of the four legal tokens:
1. a right,
2. a no-right
3. a duty, or
4. a privilege
The capacity to hold a token is what makes a factual character into a legal character. A token holder is the legal soul of a source, recipient and someone other than a source or a recipient. Typically, the Source doing conduct holds either a duty or a privilege and a Recipient receiving conduct holds either a right or no-right. Extrapolation, however, can take place.

## Content actions

### Give feedback:

My Favorites (?)

'My Favorites' is a special kind of lens which you can use to bookmark modules and collections. 'My Favorites' can only be seen by you, and collections saved in 'My Favorites' can remember the last module you were on. You need an account to use 'My Favorites'.

| A lens I own (?)

#### Definition of a lens

##### Lenses

A lens is a custom view of the content in the repository. You can think of it as a fancy kind of list that will let you see content through the eyes of organizations and people you trust.

##### What is in a lens?

Lens makers point to materials (modules and collections), creating a guide that includes their own comments and descriptive tags about the content.

##### Who can create a lens?

Any individual member, a community, or a respected organization.

##### What are tags?

Tags are descriptors added by lens makers to help label content, attaching a vocabulary that is meaningful in the context of the lens.

| External bookmarks