Skip to content Skip to navigation

Connexions

You are here: Home » Content » The Application of VSI (Vertical Scanning Interferometry) to the Study of Crystal Surface Processes

Navigation

Lenses

What is a lens?

Definition of a lens

Lenses

A lens is a custom view of the content in the repository. You can think of it as a fancy kind of list that will let you see content through the eyes of organizations and people you trust.

What is in a lens?

Lens makers point to materials (modules and collections), creating a guide that includes their own comments and descriptive tags about the content.

Who can create a lens?

Any individual member, a community, or a respected organization.

What are tags? tag icon

Tags are descriptors added by lens makers to help label content, attaching a vocabulary that is meaningful in the context of the lens.

This content is ...

Affiliated with (What does "Affiliated with" mean?)

This content is either by members of the organizations listed or about topics related to the organizations listed. Click each link to see a list of all content affiliated with the organization.
  • Rice Digital Scholarship

    This module is included in aLens by: Digital Scholarship at Rice UniversityAs a part of collections: "Chemistry of Electronic Materials", "Nanotechnology for the Oil and Gas Industry", "Physical Methods in Inorganic and Nano Chemistry"

    Click the "Rice Digital Scholarship" link to see all content affiliated with them.

Recently Viewed

This feature requires Javascript to be enabled.
 

The Application of VSI (Vertical Scanning Interferometry) to the Study of Crystal Surface Processes

Module by: Inna Kurganskaya, Andreas Luttge, Andrew R. Barron. E-mail the authorsEdited By: Andreas Luttge, Andrew R. Barron

Introduction

The processes which occur at the surfaces of crystals depend on many external and internal factors such as crystal structure and composition, conditions of a medium where the crystal surface exists and others. The appearance of a crystal surface is the result of complexity of interactions between the crystal surface and the environment. The mechanisms of surface processes such as dissolution or growth are studied by the physical chemistry of surfaces. There are a lot of computational techniques which allows us to predict the changing of surface morphology of different minerals which are influenced by different conditions such as temperature, pressure, pH and chemical composition of solution reacting with the surface. For example, Monte Carlo method is widely used to simulate the dissolution or growth of crystals. However, the theoretical models of surface processes need to be verified by natural observations. We can extract a lot of useful information about the surface processes through studying the changing of crystal surface structure under influence of environmental conditions. The changes in surface structure can be studied through the observation of crystal surface topography. The topography can be directly observed macroscopically or by using microscopic techniques. Microscopic observation allows us to study even very small changes and estimate the rate of processes by observing changing the crystal surface topography in time.

Much laboratory worked under the reconstruction of surface changes and interpretation of dissolution and precipitation kinetics of crystals. Invention of AFM made possible to monitor changes of surface structure during dissolution or growth. However, to detect and quantify the results of dissolution processes or growth it is necessary to determine surface area changes over a significantly larger field of view than AFM can provide. More recently, vertical scanning interferometry (VSI) has been developed as new tool to distinguish and trace the reactive parts of crystal surfaces. VSI and AFM are complementary techniques and practically well suited to detect surface changes.

VSI technique provides a method for quantification of surface topography at the angstrom to nanometer level. Time-dependent VSI measurements can be used to study the surface-normal retreat across crystal and other solid surfaces during dissolution process. Therefore, VSI can be used to directly and nondirectly measure mineral dissolution rates with high precision. Analogically, VSI can be used to study kinetics of crystal growth.

Physical principles of optical interferometry

Optical interferometry allows us to make extremely accurate measurements and has been used as a laboratory technique for almost a hundred years. Thomas Young observed interference of light and measured the wavelength of light in an experiment, performed around 1801. This experiment gave an evidence of Young's arguments for the wave model for light. The discovery of interference gave a basis to development of interferomertry techniques widely successfully used as in microscopic investigations, as in astronomic investigations.

The physical principles of optical interferometry exploit the wave properties of light. Light can be thought as electromagnetic wave propagating through space. If we assume that we are dealing with a linearly polarized wave propagating in a vacuum in z direction, electric field E can be represented by a sinusoidal function of distance and time.

E ( x , y , z , t ) = a cos ( vt z / λ ) E ( x , y , z , t ) = a cos ( vt z / λ ) size 12{E \( x,y,z,t \) =a"cos" left [2π \( ital "vt" - z/λ \) right ]} {}
(1)

Where a is the amplitude of the light wave, v is the frequency, and λ is its wavelength. The term within the square brackets is called the phase of the wave. Let’s rewrite this equation in more compact form,

E ( x , y , z , t ) = a cos ωt kz E ( x , y , z , t ) = a cos ωt kz size 12{E \( x,y,z,t \) =a"cos" lceil ωt - ital "kz" rceil } {}
(2)

where ω=2πvω=2πv size 12{ω=2πv} {} is the circular frequency, and k=/λk=/λ size 12{k=2π/λ} {} is the propagation constant. Let’s also transform this second equation into a complex exponential form,

E ( x , y , z , t ) = Re a exp ( ) exp ( iωt ) = Re A exp ( iωt ) E ( x , y , z , t ) = Re a exp ( ) exp ( iωt ) = Re A exp ( iωt ) size 12{E \( x,y,z,t \) ="Re" left lbrace a"exp" \( iϕ \) "exp" \( iωt \) right rbrace ="Re" left lbrace A"exp" \( iωt \) right rbrace } {}
(3)

where ϕ=2πz/λϕ=2πz/λ size 12{ϕ=2πz/λ} {} and A=exp()A=exp() size 12{A="exp" \( - iϕ \) } {} is known as the complex amplitude. If n is a refractive index of a medium where the light propagates, the light wave traverses a distance d in such a medium. The equivalent optical path in this case is

p = n d p = n d size 12{p=n cdot d} {}
(4)

When two light waves are superposed, the result intensity at any point depends on whether reinforce or cancel each other (Figure 1). This is well known phenomenon of interference. We will assume that two waves are propagating in the same direction and are polarized with their field vectors in the same plane. We will also assume that they have the same frequency. The complex amplitude at any point in the interference pattern is then the sum of the complex amplitudes of the two waves, so that we can write,

A = A 1 + A 2 A = A 1 + A 2 size 12{A=A rSub { size 8{1} } +A rSub { size 8{2} } } {}
(5)

where A1=a1exp(1)A1=a1exp(1) size 12{A rSub { size 8{1} } =a rSub { size 8{1} } "exp" \( - iϕ rSub { size 8{1} } \) } {} and A2=a2exp(2)A2=a2exp(2) size 12{A rSub { size 8{2} } =a rSub { size 8{2} } "exp" \( - iϕ rSub { size 8{2} } \) } {} are the complex amplitudes of two waves. The resultant intensity is, therefore,

I = A 2 = I 1 + I 2 + 2 ( I 1 I 2 ) 1 / 2 cos Δϕ I = A 2 = I 1 + I 2 + 2 ( I 1 I 2 ) 1 / 2 cos Δϕ size 12{I= lline A rline rSup { size 8{2} } =I rSub { size 8{1} } +I rSub { size 8{2} } +2 \( I rSub { size 8{1} } I rSub { size 8{2} } \) rSup { size 8{1/2} } "cos"Δϕ} {}
(6)

where I1I1 size 12{I rSub { size 8{1} } } {} and I2I2 size 12{I rSub { size 8{2} } } {} are the intensities of two waves acting separately, and Δϕ=ϕ1ϕ2Δϕ=ϕ1ϕ2 size 12{Δϕ=ϕ rSub { size 8{1} } - ϕ rSub { size 8{2} } } {} is the phase difference between them. If the two waves are derived from a common source, the phase difference corresponds to an optical path difference,

Δp = ( λ / ) Δϕ Δp = ( λ / ) Δϕ size 12{Δp= \( λ/2π \) Δϕ} {}
(7)
Figure 1: The scheme of interferometric wave interaction when two waves interact with each other, the amplitude of resulting wave will increase or decrease. The value of this amplitude depends on phase difference between two original waves.
Figure 1 (graphics1.jpg)

If ΔϕΔϕ size 12{Δϕ} {}, the phase difference between the beams, varies linearly across the field of view, the intensity varies cosinusoidally, giving rise to alternating light and dark bands or fringes (Figure 1). The intensity in an interference pattern has its maximum value

I max = I 1 + I 2 + 2 ( I 1 I 2 ) 1 / 2 I max = I 1 + I 2 + 2 ( I 1 I 2 ) 1 / 2 size 12{I rSub { size 8{"max"} } =I rSub { size 8{1} } +I rSub { size 8{2} } +2 \( I rSub { size 8{1} } I rSub { size 8{2} } \) rSup { size 8{1/2} } } {}
(8)

when Δϕ=2mπΔϕ=2mπ size 12{Δϕ=2mπ} {}, where m is an integer and its minimum value

I min = I 1 + I 2 2 ( I 1 I 2 ) 1 / 2 I min = I 1 + I 2 2 ( I 1 I 2 ) 1 / 2 size 12{I rSub { size 8{"min"} } =I rSub { size 8{1} } +I rSub { size 8{2} } - 2 \( I rSub { size 8{1} } I rSub { size 8{2} } \) rSup { size 8{1/2} } } {}
(9)

when Δϕ=(2m+1)πΔϕ=(2m+1)π size 12{Δϕ= \( 2m+1 \) π} {}.

The principle of interferometry is widely used to develop many types of interferometric set ups. One of the earliest set ups is Michelson interferometry. The idea of this interferometry is quite simple: interference fringes are produced by splitting a beam of monochromatic light so that one beam strikes a fixed mirror and the other a movable mirror. An interference pattern results when the reflected beams are brought back together. The Michelson interferometric scheme is shown in Figure 2.

Figure 2: Schematic representation of a Michelson interferometry set-up.
Figure 2 (graphics2.jpg)

The difference of path lengths between two beams is 2x because beams traverse the designated distances twice. The interference occurs when the path difference is equal to integer numbers of wavelengths,

Δp = 2x = , m = 0, ± 1, ± 2 . . . Δp = 2x = , m = 0, ± 1, ± 2 . . . size 12{Δp=2x=mλ,m=0, +- 1, +- 2 "." "." "." } {}
(10)

Modern interferometric systems are more complicated. Using special phase-measurement techniques they capable to perform much more accurate height measurements than can be obtained just by directly looking at the interference fringes and measuring how they depart from being straight and equally spaced. Typically interferometric system consist of lights source, beamsplitter, objective system, system of registration of signals and transformation into digital format and computer which process data. Vertical scanning interferometry is contains all these parts. Figure 3 shows a configuration of VSI interferometric system.

Figure 3: Schematic representation of the Vertical scanning interferometry (VSI) system.
Figure 3 (Fig3.jpg)

Many of modern interferometric systems use Mirau objective in their constructions. Mireau objective is based on a Michelson interferometer. This objective consists of a lens, a reference mirror and a beamsplitter. The idea of getting interfering beams is simple: two beams (red lines) travel along the optical axis. Then they are reflected from the reference surface and the sample surface respectively (blue lines). After this these beams are recombined to interfere with each other. An illumination or light source system is used to direct light onto a sample surface through a cube beam splitter and the Mireau objective. The sample surface within the field of view of the objective is uniformly illuminated by those beams with different incidence angles. Any point on the sample surface can reflect those incident beams in the form of divergent cone. Similarly, the point on the reference symmetrical with that on the sample surface also reflects those illuminated beams in the same form.

The Mireau objective directs the beams reflected of the reference and the sample surface onto a CCD (charge-coupled device) sensor through a tube lens. The CCD sensor is an analog shift register that enables the transportation of analog signals (electric charges) through successive stages (capacitors), controlled by a clock signal. The resulting interference fringe pattern is detected by CCD sensor and the corresponding signal is digitized by a frame grabber for further processing with a computer.

The distance between a minimum and a maximum of the interferogram produced by two beams reflected from the reference and sample surface is known. That is, exactly half the wavelength of the light source. Therefore, with a simple interferogram the vertical resolution of the technique would be also limited to λ/2. If we will use a laser light as a light source with a wavelength of 300 nm the resolution would be only 150 nm. This resolution is not good enough for a detailed near-atomic scale investigation of crystal surfaces. Fortunately, the vertical resolution of the technique can be improved significantly by moving either the reference or the sample by a fraction of the wavelength of the light. In this way, several interferograms are produced. Then they are all overlayed, and their phase shifts compared by the computer software Figure 4. This method is widely known as phase shift interferometry (PSI).

Figure 4: Sketch illustrating phase-shift technology. The sample is continuously moved along the vertical axes in order to scan surface topography. All interferograms are automatically overlayed using computer software.
Figure 4 (graphics4.jpg)

Most optical testing interferometers now use phase-shifting techniques not only because of high resolution but also because phase-shifting is a high accuracy rapid way of getting the interferogram information into the computer. Also usage of this technique makes the inherent noise in the data taking process very low. As the result in a good environment angstrom or sub-angstrom surface height measurements can be performed. As it was said above, in phase-shifting interferometry the phase difference between the interfering beams is changed at a constant rate as the detector is read out. Once the phase is determined across the interference field, the corresponding height distribution on the sample surface can be determined. The phase distribution φ(x, y) is recorded by using the CCD camera.

Let’s assign A(x, y), B(x, y), C(x, y) and D(x, y) to the resulting interference light intensities which are corresponded to phase-shifting steps of 0, π/2, π and 3π/2. These intensities can be obtained by moving the reference mirror through displacements of λ/8, λ/4 and 3λ/8, respectively. The equations for the resulting intensities would be:

A ( x , y ) = I 1 ( x , y ) + I 2 ( x , y ) cos α ( x , y ) A ( x , y ) = I 1 ( x , y ) + I 2 ( x , y ) cos α ( x , y ) size 12{A \( x,y \) =I rSub { size 8{1} } \( x,y \) +I rSub { size 8{2} } \( x,y \) "cos"α \( x,y \) } {}
(11)
B ( x , y ) = I 1 ( x , y ) I 2 ( x , y ) sin α ( x , y ) B ( x , y ) = I 1 ( x , y ) I 2 ( x , y ) sin α ( x , y ) size 12{B \( x,y \) =I rSub { size 8{1} } \( x,y \) - I rSub { size 8{2} } \( x,y \) "sin"α \( x,y \) } {}
(12)
C ( x , y ) = I 1 ( x , y ) I 2 ( x , y ) cos α ( x , y ) C ( x , y ) = I 1 ( x , y ) I 2 ( x , y ) cos α ( x , y ) size 12{C \( x,y \) =I rSub { size 8{1} } \( x,y \) - I rSub { size 8{2} } \( x,y \) "cos"α \( x,y \) } {}
(13)
D ( x , y ) = I 1 ( x , y ) + I 2 ( x , y ) sin α ( x , y ) D ( x , y ) = I 1 ( x , y ) + I 2 ( x , y ) sin α ( x , y ) size 12{D \( x,y \) =I rSub { size 8{1} } \( x,y \) +I rSub { size 8{2} } \( x,y \) "sin"α \( x,y \) } {}
(14)

where I1x,yI1x,y size 12{I rSub { size 8{1} } left (x,y right )} {}and I2x,yI2x,y size 12{I rSub { size 8{2} } left (x,y right )} {} are two overlapping beams from two symmetric points on the test surface and the reference respectively. Solving equations Equation 11Equation 14, the phase map φ(x, y) of a sample surface will be given by the relation:

ϕ x , y = B x , y D x , y A x , y C x , y ϕ x , y = B x , y D x , y A x , y C x , y size 12{ϕ left (x,y right )= { {B left (x,y right ) - D left (x,y right )} over {A left (x,y right ) - C left (x,y right )} } } {}
(15)

Once the phaseis determined across the interference field pixel by pixel on a two-dimensional CCD array, the local height distribution/contour, h(x, y), on the test surface is given by

h ( x , y ) = λ ϕ ( x , y ) h ( x , y ) = λ ϕ ( x , y ) size 12{h \( x,y \) = { {λ} over {4π} } ϕ \( x,y \) } {}
(16)

Normally the resulted fringe can be in the form of a linear fringe pattern by adjusting the relative position between the reference mirror and sample surfaces. Hence any distorted interference fringe would indicate a local profile/contour of the test surface.

It is important to note that the Mireau objective is mounted on a capacitive closed-loop controlled PZT (piezoelectric actuator) as to enable phase shifting to be accurately implemented. The PZT is based on piezoelectric effect referred to the electric potential generated by applying pressure to piezoelectric material. This type of materials is used to convert electrical energy to mechanical energy and vice-versa. The precise motion that results when an electric potential is applied to a piezoelectric material has an importance for nanopositioning. Actuators using the piezo effect have been commercially available for 35 years and in that time have transformed the world of precision positioning and motion control.

Vertical scanning interferometer also has another name; white-light interferometry (WLI) because of using the white light as a source of light. With this type of source a separate fringe system is produced for each wavelength, and the resultant intensity at any point of examined surface is obtained by summing these individual patterns. Due to the broad bandwidth of the source the coherent length L of the source is short:

L = λ 2 nΔλ L = λ 2 nΔλ size 12{L= { {λ rSup { size 8{2} } } over {nΔλ} } } {}
(17)

where λ is the center wavelength, n is the refractive index of the medium, ∆λ is the spectral width of the source. In this way good contrast fringes can be obtained only when the lengths of interfering beams pathways are closed to each other. If we will vary the length of a pathway of a beam reflected from sample, the height of a sample can be determined by looking at the position for which a fringe contrast is a maximum. In this case interference pattern exist only over a very shallow depth of the surface. When we vary a pathway of sample-reflected beam we also move the sample in a vertical direction in order to get the phase at which maximum intensity of fringes will be achieved. This phase will be converted in height of a point at the sample surface.

The combination of phase shift technology with white-light source provides a very powerful tool to measure the topography of quite rough surfaces with the amplitude in heights about and the precision up to 1-2 nm. Through a developed software package for quantitatively evaluating the resulting interferogram, the proposed system can retrieve the surface profile and topography of the sample objects Figure 5.

Figure 5: Example of muscovite surface topography, obtained by using VSI- 50x objective.
Figure 5 (graphics5.jpg)

A comparison of common methods to determine surface topography: SEM, AFM and VSI

Except the interferometric methods described above, there are a several other microscopic techniques for studying crystal surface topography. The most common are scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and atomic force microscopy (AFM). All these techniques are used to obtain information about the surface structure. However they differ from each other by the physical principles on which they based.

Scanning electron microscopy

SEM allows us to obtain images of surface topography with the resolution much higher than the conventional light microscopes do. Also it is able to provide information about other surface characteristics such as chemical composition, electrical conductivity etc, see Figure 6. All types of data are generated by the reflecting of accelerated electron beams from the sample surface. When electrons strike the sample surface, they lose their energy by repeated random scattering and adsorption within an outer layer into the depth varying from 100 nm to 5 microns.

Figure 6: Scheme of electron beam-sample interaction at SEM analysis
Figure 6 (graphics6.jpg)

The thickness of this outer layer also knows as interactive layer depends on energy of electrons in the beam, composition and density of a sample. Result of the interaction between electron beam and the surface provides several types of signals. The main type is secondary or inelastic scattered electrons. They are produced as a result of interaction between the beam of electrons and weakly bound electrons in the conduction band of the sample. Secondary electrons are ejected from the k-orbitals of atoms within the surface layer of thickness about a few nanometers. This is because secondary electrons are low energy electrons (<50 eV), so only those formed within the first few nanometers of the sample surface have enough energy to escape and be detected. Secondary backscattered electrons provide the most common signal to investigate surface topography with lateral resolution up to 0.4 - 0.7 nm.

High energy beam electrons are elastic scattered back from the surface. This type of signal gives information about chemical composition of the surface because the energy of backscattered electrons depends on the weight of atoms within the interaction layer. Also this type of electrons can form secondary electrons and escape from the surface or travel father into the sample than the secondary. The SEM image formed is the result of the intensity of the secondary electron emission from the sample at each x,y data point during the scanning of the surface.

Atomic force microscopy

AFM is a very popular tool to study surface dissolution. AFM set up consists of scanning a sharp tip on the end of a flexible cantilever which moves across a sample surface. The tips typically have an end radius of 2 to 20 nm, depending on tip type. When the tip touch the surface the forces of these interactions leads to deflection of a cantilever. The interaction between tip and sample surface involve mechanical contact forces, van der Waals forces, capillary forces, chemical bonding, electrostatic forces, magnetic forces etc. The deflection of a cantilever is usually measured by reflecting a laser beam off the back of the cantilever into a split photodiode detector. A schematic drawing of AFM can be seen in Figure 7. The two most commonly used modes of operation are contact mode AFM and tapping mode AFM, which are conducted in air or liquid environments.

Figure 7: Schematic drawing of an AFM apparatus.
Figure 7 (graphics7.jpg)

Working under the contact mode AFM scans the sample while monitoring the change in cantilever deflection with the split photodiode detector. Loop maintains a constant cantilever reflection by vertically moving the scanner to get a constant signal. The distance which the scanner goes by moving vertically at each x,y data point is stored by the computer to form the topographic image of the sample surface. Working under the tapping mode AFM oscillates the cantilever at its resonance frequency (typically~300 kHz) and lightly “taps” the tip on the surface during scanning. The electrostatic forces increase when tip gets close to the sample surface, therefore the amplitude of the oscillation decreases. The laser deflection method is used to detect the amplitude of cantilever oscillation. Similar to the contact mode, feedback loop maintains a constant oscillation amplitude by moving the scanner vertically at every x,y data point. Recording this movement forms the topographical image. The advantage of tapping mode over contact mode is that it eliminates the lateral, shear forces present in contact mode. This enables tapping mode to image soft, fragile, and adhesive surfaces without damaging them while work under contact mode allows the damage to occur.

Comparison of techniques

All techniques described above are widely used in studying of surface nano- and micromorphology. However, each method has its own limitations and the proper choice of analytical technique depends on features of analyzed surface and primary goals of research.

All these techniques are capable to obtain an image of a sample surface with quite good resolution. The lateral resolution of VSI is much less, then for other techniques: 150 nm for VSI and 0.5 nm for AFM and SEM. Vertical resolution of AFM (0.5 Ǻ) is better then for VSI (1 - 2 nm), however VSI is capable to measure a high vertical range of heights (1 mm) which makes possible to study even very rough surfaces. On the contrary, AFM allows us to measure only quite smooth surfaces because of its relatively small vertical scan range (7 µm). SEM has less resolution, than AFM because it requires coating of a conductive material with the thickness within several nm.

The significant advantage of VSI is that it can provide a large field of view (845 × 630 µm for 10x objective) of tested surfaces. Recent studies of surface roughness characteristics showed that the surface roughness parameters increase with the increasing field of view until a critical size of 250,000 µm is reached. This value is larger then the maximum field of view produced by AFM (100 × 100 µm) but can be easily obtained by VSI. SEM is also capable to produce images with large field of view. However, SEM is able to provide only 2D images from one scan while AFM and VSI let us to obtain 3D images. It makes quantitative analysis of surface topography more complicated, for example, topography of membranes is studied by cross section and top view images.

Table 1: A comparison of VSI sample and resolution with AFM and SEM.
  VSI AFM SEM
Lateral resolution 0.5-1.2 µm 0.5 nm 0.5-1 nm
Vertical resolution 2 nm 0.5 Å Only 2D images
Field of view 845 × 630 µm (10x objective) 100 × 100 µm 1-2 mm
Vertical range of scan 1 mm 10 µm -
Preparation of a sample - - Required coating of a conducted material
Required environment Air Air, liquid Vacuum

The experimental studying of surface processes using microscopic techniques

The limitations of each technique described above are critically important to choose appropriate technique for studying surface processes. Let’s explore application of these techniques to study dissolution of crystals.

When crystalline matter dissolves the changes of the crystal surface topography can be observed by using microscopic techniques. If we will apply an unreactive mask (silicon for example) on crystal surface and place a crystalline sample into the experiment reactor then we get two types of surfaces: dissolving and remaining the same or unreacted. After some period of time the crystal surface starts to dissolve and change its z-level. In order to study these changes ex situ we can pull out a sample from the reaction cell then remove a mask and measure the average height difference ΔhˉΔhˉ size 12{Δ { bar {h}}} {}between the unreacted and dissolved areas. The average heights of dissolved and unreacted areas are obtained through digital processing of data obtained by microscopes. The velocity of normal surface retreat vSNRvSNR size 12{v rSub { size 8{ ital "SNR"} } } {} during the time interval ∆t is defined as

{} v SNR = Δ h ¯ Δt v SNR = Δ h ¯ Δt size 12{v rSub { size 8{ ital "SNR"} } = { {Δ {overline {h}} } over {Δt} } } {}

Dividing this velocity by the molar volume V¯V¯ size 12{ {overline {V}} } {}(cm3/mol) gives a global dissolution rate in the familiar units of moles per unit area per unit time:

R = v SNR V ¯ R = v SNR V ¯ size 12{R= { {v rSub { size 8{ ital "SNR"} } } over { {overline {V}} } } } {}
(18)

This method allows us to obtain experimental values of dissolution rates just by precise measuring of average surface heights. Moreover, using this method we can measure local dissolution rates at etch pits by monitoring changes in the volume and density of etch pits across the surface over time. VSI technique is capable to perform these measurements because of large vertical range of scanning. In order to get precise values of rates which are not depend on observing place of crystal surface we need to measure enough large areas. VSI technique provides data from areas which are large enough to study surfaces with heterogeneous dissolution dynamics and obtain average dissolution rates. Therefore, VSI makes possible to measure rates of normal surface retreat during the dissolution and observe formation, growth and distribution of etch pits on the surface.

However, if the mechanism of dissolution is controlled by dynamics of atomic steps and kink sites within a smooth atomic surface area, the observation of the dissolution process need to use a more precise technique. AFM is capable to provide information about changes in step morphology in situ when the dissolution occurs. For example, immediate response of the dissolved surface to the changing of environmental conditions (concentrations of ions in the solution, pH etc.) can be studied by using AFM.

SEM is also used to examine micro and nanotexture of solid surfaces and study dissolution processes. This method allows us to observe large areas of crystal surface with high resolution which makes possible to measure a high variety of surfaces. The significant disadvantage of this method is the requirement to cover examine sample by conductive substance which limits the resolution of SEM. The other disadvantage of SEM is that the analysis is conducted in vacuum. Recent technique, environmental SEM or ESEM overcomes these requirements and makes possible even examine liquids and biological materials. The third disadvantage of this technique is that it produces only 2D images. This creates some difficulties to measure Δh¯Δh¯ size 12{Δ {overline {h}} } {} within the dissolving area. One of advantages of this technique is that it is able to measure not only surface topography but also chemical composition and other surface characteristics of the surface. This fact is used to monitor changing in chemical composition during the dissolution.

Bibliography

  • A. C. Lasaga, Kinetic Theory in the Earth Sciences. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ (1998).
  • A. Luttge, E. V. Bolton, and A. C. Lasaga A.C., Am. J. Sci., 1999, 299, 652.
  • D. Kaczmarek, Vacuum, 2001, 62, 303.
  • P. Hariharan. Optical interferometry, Second edition, Academic press (2003) ISBN 0-12-311630-9.
  • A. Luttge and P. G. Conrad, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 2004, 70, 1627.
  • A. C. Lasaga and A. Luttge, American Mineralogist, 2004, 89, 527.
  • K. J. Davis and A. Luttge, Am. J. Sci., 2005, 305, 727.
  • S. H. Wang and Tay, Meas. Sci. Technol., 2006, 17, 617.
  • A. Luttge and R. S. Arvidson, in Kinetics of water-rock interaction, Ed. S. Brantley, J. Kubicki, and A. White, Springer (2007).
  • L. Zhang and A. Luttge, American Mineralogist, 2007, 92, 1316.
  • C. Fischer A. and Luttge, Am. J. Sci., 2007, 307, 955.
  • Y. Wyart, G. Georges, C. Deumie, C. Amra, and P. Moulina, J. Membrane Sci., 2008, 315, 82.
  • T. C. Vaimakis, E. D. Economou, and C. C. Trapalis, J. Therm. Anal. Cal., 2008, 92, 783.

Content actions

Download module as:

Add module to:

My Favorites (?)

'My Favorites' is a special kind of lens which you can use to bookmark modules and collections. 'My Favorites' can only be seen by you, and collections saved in 'My Favorites' can remember the last module you were on. You need an account to use 'My Favorites'.

| A lens I own (?)

Definition of a lens

Lenses

A lens is a custom view of the content in the repository. You can think of it as a fancy kind of list that will let you see content through the eyes of organizations and people you trust.

What is in a lens?

Lens makers point to materials (modules and collections), creating a guide that includes their own comments and descriptive tags about the content.

Who can create a lens?

Any individual member, a community, or a respected organization.

What are tags? tag icon

Tags are descriptors added by lens makers to help label content, attaching a vocabulary that is meaningful in the context of the lens.

| External bookmarks