Skip to content Skip to navigation

Connexions

You are here: Home » Content » How Peace Activists Can Be More Effective

Navigation

Recently Viewed

This feature requires Javascript to be enabled.
 

How Peace Activists Can Be More Effective

Module by: Buryl Payne. E-mail the author

Summary: Peace activities are all too often reactive rather than proactive. Only after an international battle or war are attempts made to ameliorate situations by constructing treaties, agreements, or curtailment of nuclear weapons, cluster bombs, poison gas, biological weapons, etc. This is a kind of political symptom treatment. Historical analysis shows this approach is only partially successful. When wars start up again peace treaties go out the window! Effective peace treatments for warring behavior may be aided by more modern understanding of the nature of war.

How Peace Activists Can Be More Effective

Buryl Payne

Peace activities are all too often reactive rather than proactive. Only after an international battle or war are attempts made to ameliorate situations by constructing treaties, agreements, or curtailment of nuclear weapons, cluster bombs, poison gas, biological weapons, etc. This is a kind of political symptom treatment. Historical analysis shows this approach is only partially successful. When wars start up again peace treaties go out the window!

Effective peace treatments for warring behavior may be aided by more modern understanding of the nature of war.

Section I. Wars come and go in cycles.

Warring behavior can be considered as a kind of mass psychosis. It is unsane behavior. Individuals who behave that way are locked up and treated by psychiatrists.

The most important finding of scientists, based on observations, not theories, is that wars

come and go in cycles. These cycles were discovered by the late Professor Raymond Wheeler, a psychologist and historian at the University of Kansas. He found that as part of his larger historical analysis, international battles happen in approximately 11 year cycles and have done so for 2,500 years. Prior to that time accurate data was unavailable. Later on, his work was statistically validated by Edward Dewey, Director of the Foundation for the Study of Cycles. Dewey considered the analysis of war cycles as the most important work of his life. A portion of Wheeler’s data on war cycles is shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1
Figure 1 (graphics1.jpg)

Figure 1. Some of Wheelers Data on International Battles. The 11 1/5-year cycle in International Battles, 1760-1947.

Dewey and Wheeler suspected that warring behavior was connected with sunspot cycles, but their work took place before space probes discovered the solar wind, the name for streams of particles emitted from the Sun. These, in turn, affect the Earth’s magnetic field, which influences all biological life and is most active either a year or two before the sunspot peak or a year or two after; never right on the sunspot peak.

Table 1
graphics2.pngFigure 2. - A Typical Smoothed Sunspot Peak.  

The start of battles occurrs mostly during the ascent, or descent, of sunspot activity every 11 years, when geomagnetic activity is highest. The small arrow at the bottom of the figure indicates our position in time vs. sunspot activity as of Fall 2009. The sunspot activity is still zero. Once wars start they may quickly die our or they may carry on for years. That depends on other factors. Only the start of battles or wars is triggered by solar activity. Many other human ailments or behaviors are also highly correlated with solar activity cycles via the geomagnetic field activity, such as many heart trouble, flu, accidents, and psychotic behavior. There is a large body of literature on these effects. Sunspot and other kinds of solar activity is in turn related to, and predicted by, the positions of the planets.

When Earth is close to Mercury, Venus, and Mars at the same time and the Moon lines up with one of them, this is a common likely time for international battles to start Warring Behavior usually occurs twice every eleven year solar cycle as illustrated in Figure 2.

Laboratory studies have shown that geomagnetic activity affects human brain rhythms and endocrine balance in some individuals. This information clearly shows a change of context for the explanation of human warring behavior from that of individual responsibility (and irresponsibility) to that of a kind of mass psychosis triggered by processes off the planet. This is not a theory, it is observations. Of course other factors are involved such as greed, territoriality, religious doctrines, and race differences, all primitive, short sighted, animalistic factors no longer relevant for 21st century Earth. However, the cycles of war take precedence over those factors. Most importantly, times of likely out breaks of wars are predictable. The primitive, tribal factors do not usually support making predictions.

This approach provides peace activists with important information. Their actions can be more clearly directed to be preventative, rather than waiting for something to happen and then reacting.

Section II. The Power of Thought.

A second important finding of some scientists is proof of the power of thought to affect physical events and the behavior of others. While some people with classical scientific education rigidly hold on to older mechanical views of how the Universe works, others, forging ahead, accept, and are demonstrating in and out of the laboratory, that thought power is a real force. During 1983 to 1988 the Academy for Peace Research and an organization called Peace the 21st organized global peace meditations six times a year. The results clearly showed that solar activity decreased 24 hours after each meditation. Figure 3 shows some of the data:

Figure 2
Figure 2 (graphics3.png)

More is, on my website:

Buryl.com under ‘Academy for Peace Research’ > ‘past projects’ > ‘The Power of Thought’ (http://www.buryl.com/apr_power_of_thought.htm ) and linked at the end of that is further information. At that time the power of thought was not a common paradigm, except to a few quantum physicists and new age thinkers, so no editor was found who would print the report.

Now things have changed. This time period ( 2010 – 2020 ) is a good one for peace thought power projects for the majority of political leaders remain within the framework of the older scientific paradigms and believe the universe is a mechanical arrangement of lifeless components or have even more pre-scientific beliefs coming from the feudal middle ages and tribal religions. “I’m right because I’m bigger, stronger, more ruthless, command more men, etc.”, or “My god says our tribe is the best”, or “my skin color is better than yours”. With such prevailing paradigms, peace activists can work using thought power without any resistance. Making use of thought forces that ‘the enemy’ does not believe in does not meet with organized resistance. Having predictive knowledge of likely times of mass psychosis can suggest good times to take preventative physical and mental actions. Even though a large proportion of the people may not understand the full scientific background or principles involved, they can be involved in a simple way with positive visions. Peace thought power (meditations or visualizations) can be simple, easy, and celebratory, designed when possible to fit in with festive times and holidays.

At the same time, plans for physical disruptions can, and must be, made, for there are too many pre psychotic or unsane political leaders who control and direct uneducated or mechanically thinking people.

In longer term views, peace activists can plan ahead to educate children in modem scientific findings, taking care of mother earth as a whole And the use of thought power and stepping out of the older paradigms such as ‘might makes right’ or ‘the use of force is a last resort.’ Perhaps many armies can be slowly replaced by international peace corps. If children can be educated everywhere, peace will probably manifest in one or two generations.

Dewey, E. R., Evidence of cyclic patterns in an index of International War Battles. 600 B.C.-A.D. 1957, Cycles, 21(6), pp 121-158, 1970.

Dilbeck, M. et al The Transcendental Meditation Program and Crime Rate changes in a Sample of Forty Eight cities. Crime and Justice, Vol. IV, 1981.

Friedman, H. and Becker, R.O., Geomagnetic parameters and Psychiatric Hospital Admissions, Nature, V. 200, pp 626-628, 1963.

Hundhausen, A.J. 1979. Solar Activity and The Solar Wind. Review of Solar Physics and Space Physics. pp. 2034-2048.

Payne, B. The Global Meditation Project, National Council for Geocosmic Research, Winter 1987.

“ How to Predict Solar and Geomagnetic Activity. (inpublished as of Jan., 2004)

“ Planetary Positions and Sunspots, 1992. National Council on Geocosmic Research. Spring. 1359 Sargent Ave. St. Paul, MN 55105.

“ Global Peace Meditation Research Project - Interim Report. NCGR Journal. Winter-Spring, 1987. Available at www.buryl.com.

“ Power of thought to Influence the Sun. Journal of Borderland Research (no longer in print). Available at www.buryl.com.

(Payne articles available in e-book format in the book on ‘Spin’ by Buryl Payne, http://www.buryl.com/spin_book.htm)

Content actions

Download module as:

Add module to:

My Favorites (?)

'My Favorites' is a special kind of lens which you can use to bookmark modules and collections. 'My Favorites' can only be seen by you, and collections saved in 'My Favorites' can remember the last module you were on. You need an account to use 'My Favorites'.

| A lens I own (?)

Definition of a lens

Lenses

A lens is a custom view of the content in the repository. You can think of it as a fancy kind of list that will let you see content through the eyes of organizations and people you trust.

What is in a lens?

Lens makers point to materials (modules and collections), creating a guide that includes their own comments and descriptive tags about the content.

Who can create a lens?

Any individual member, a community, or a respected organization.

What are tags? tag icon

Tags are descriptors added by lens makers to help label content, attaching a vocabulary that is meaningful in the context of the lens.

| External bookmarks