Boron
Borax (a mixture of Na2B4O7.4H2O and Na2B4O7.10H2O) was known for thousands of years. In Tibet it was known by the Sanskrit name of tincal. Borax glazes were used in China in 300 AD, and the writings of the Arabic alchemist Geber (Figure 1) appear to mention it in 700 AD. However, it is known that Marco Polo brought some borax glazes back to Italy in the 13th century. In 1600 Agricola (Figure 2) in his treatise De Re Metallica reported the use of borax as a flux in metallurgy.
![]() |
![]() |
Boron was not recognized as an element until its isolation by Sir Humphry Davy (Figure 3), Joseph Louis Gay-Lussac (Figure 4) and Louis Jacques Thénard (Figure 5) in 1808 through the reaction of boric acid and potassium. Davy called the element boracium. Jöns Jakob Berzelius (Figure 6) identified boron as an element in 1824.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Aluminum
Ancient Greeks and Romans used aluminum salts as dyeing mordants and as astringents for dressing wounds; alum (KAl(SO4)2.12H2O) is still used as a styptic (an antihaemorrhagic agent). In 1808, Sir Humphry Davy (Figure 3) identified the existence of a metal base of alum, which he at first termed alumium and later aluminum.
The metal was first produced in 1825 (in an impure form) by Hans Christian Ørsted (Figure 7) by the reaction of anhydrous aluminum chloride with potassium amalgam. Friedrich Wöhler (Figure 8) repeated the experiments of Ørsted but suggested that Ørsted had only isolated potassium. By the use of potassium, Equation 1, he is credited with isolating aluminum in 1827. While Wöhler is generally credited with isolating aluminum, Ørsted should also be given credit.

![]() |
![]() |
In 1846 Henri Deville (Figure 9) improved Wöhler's method, and described his improvements in particular the use of sodium in place of the expensive potassium

![]() |
Gallium
The element gallium was predicted, as eka-aluminum, by Mendeleev (Figure 10) in 1870, and subsequently discovered by Lecoq de Boisbaudran (Figure 11) in 1875; in fact de Boisbaudran had been searching for the missing element for some years, based on his own independent theory. The first experimental indication of gallium came with the observation of two new violet lines in the spark spectrum of a sample deposited on zinc. Within a month of these initial results de Boisbaudran had isolated 1 g of the metal starting from several hundred kilograms of crude zinc blende ore. The new element was named in honor of France (Latin Gallia), and the striking similarity of its physical and chemical properties to those predicted by Mendeleev did much to establish the general acceptance of the periodic Law; indeed, when de Boisbaudran first stated that the density of Ga was 4.7 g cm-3 rather than the predicted 5.9 g/cm3, Mendeleev wrote to him suggesting that he redetermine the value (the correct value is 5.904 g/cm3).
![]() |
![]() |
Indium
While testing ores from the mines around Freiberg, Saxony, Ferdinand Reich (Figure 12) and Hieronymous Theodor Richter (Figure 13) when they dissolved the minerals pyrite, arsenopyrite, galena and sphalerite in hydrochloric acid, and since it was known that ores from that region contained thallium they searched for the green emission lines by spectroscopy. Although the green lines were absent, a blue line was present in the spectrum. As no element was known with a bright blue emission they concluded that a new element was present in the minerals. They named the element with the blue spectral line indium. Richter went on to isolate the metal in 1864.
![]() |
![]() |
Thallium
After the publication of their improved method of flame spectroscopy by Robert Bunsen (Figure 14) and Gustav Kirchhoff (Figure 15) this method became an accepted method to determine the composition of minerals and chemical products. Two chemists, William Crookes (Figure 16) and Claude-Auguste Lamy, both started to use the new method and independently employed it in their discovery of thallium.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Crookes was making spectroscopic determinations on selenium compounds deposited in the lead chamber of a sulfuric acid production plant near Tilkerode in the Harz mountains. Using a similar spectrometer to Crookes', Lamy was determining the composition of a selenium-containing substance that was deposited during the production of sulfuric acid from pyrite. Using spectroscopy both researchers both observed a new green line the atomic absorption spectrum and assigned it to a new element. Both set out to isolate the new element. Fortunately for Lamy, he had received his material in larger quantities and thus he was able to isolate sufficient quantities of thallium to determine the properties of several compounds and prepare a small ingot of metallic thallium. At the same time Crookes was able to isolate small quantities of elemental thallium and determine the properties of a few compounds. The claim by both scientists resulted in significant controversy during 1862 and 1863; interestingly this ended when Crookes was elected Fellow of the Royal Society in June 1863.
































