Based on: Linear Regression and Correlation: Outliers by Susan Dean, Barbara Illowsky, Ph.D.
Summary: This module provides an overview of Linear Regression and Correlation: Outliers as a part of the Collaborative Statistics Custom Collection modified by Roberta Bloom. it is based on the module m17094 in collection col10522 by Barbara Illowsky and Susan Dean. This module has been modified to include a graphical method of identifying outliers that was not included in the original module m17094.
In some data sets, there are values (observed data points) called outliers. Outliers are observed data points that are far from the least squares line. They have large "errors", where the "error" or residual is the vertical distance from the line to the point.
Outliers need to be examined closely. Sometimes, for some reason or another, they should not be included in the analysis of the data. It is possible that an outlier is a result of erroneous data. Other times, an outlier may hold valuable information about the population under study and should remain included in the data. The key is to carefully examine what causes a data point to be an outlier.
Besides outliers, a sample may contain one or a few points that are called influential points. Influential points are observed data points that are far from the other observed data points but that greatly influence the line. As a result an influential point may be close to the line, even though it is far from the rest of the data. Because an influential point so strongly influences the best fit line, it generally will not have a large "error" or residual.
Computers and many calculators can be used to identify outliers from the data. Computer output for regression analysis will often identify both outliers and influential points so that you can examine them.
We could guess at outliers by looking at a graph of the scatterplot and best fit line. However we would like some guideline as to how far away a point needs to be in order to be considered an outlier. As a rough rule of thumb, we can flag any point that is located further than two standard deviations above or below the best fit line as an outlier. The standard deviation used is the standard deviation of the residuals or errors.
We can do this visually in the scatterplot by drawing an extra pair of lines that are two standard deviations above and below the best fit line. Any data points that are outside this extra pair of lines are flagged as potential outliers. Or we can do this numerically by calculating each residual and comparing it to twice the standard deviation. On the TI-83, 83+, or 84+, the graphical approach is easier. The graphical procedure is shown first, followed by the numerical calculations. You would generally only need to use one of these methods.
In the third exam/final exam example, you can determine if there is an outlier or not. If there is an outlier, as an exercise, delete it and fit the remaining data to a new line. For this example, the new line ought to fit the remaining data better. This means the SSE should be smaller and the correlation coefficient ought to be closer to 1 or -1.
With the TI-83,83+,84+ graphing calculators, it is easy to
identify the outlier graphically and visually. If we were to measure the vertical distance from any data point to the corresponding point on the line of best fit and that distance was equal to
As we did with the equation of the regression line and the correlation coefficient, we will use technology to calculate this standard deviation for us. Using the LinRegTTest with this data, scroll down through the output screens to find s=16.412
Line Y2=-173.5+4.83x-2(16.4) and line Y3=-173.5+4.83X+2(16.4)
Graph the scatterplot with the best fit line in equation Y1, then enter the two extra lines as Y2 and Y3 in the "Y="equation editor and press ZOOM 9. You will find that the only data point that is not between lines Y2 and Y3 is the point x=65, y=175. On the calculator screen it is just barely outside these lines. The outlier is the student who had a grade of 65 on the third exam and 175 on the final exam; this point is further than 2 standard deviations away from the best fit line.
Sometimes a point is so close to the lines used to flag outliers on the graph that it is difficult to tell if the point is between or outside the lines. On a computer, enlarging the graph may help; on a small calculator screen, zooming in may make the graph more clear. Note that when the graph does not give a clear enough picture, you can use the numerical comparisons to identify outliers.
![]() |
In the table below, the first two columns are the third exam and final exam data.
The third column shows the predicted
Rather than calculate the value of s ourselves, we can find s using the computer or calculator. For this example, our calculator LinRegTTest found s=16.4 as the standard deviation of the residuals: 35; -17; 16; -6; -19; 9; 3; -1; -10; -9; -1.
| 65 | 175 | 140 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 67 | 133 | 150 | |
| 71 | 185 | 169 | |
| 71 | 163 | 169 | |
| 66 | 126 | 145 | |
| 75 | 198 | 189 | |
| 67 | 153 | 150 | |
| 70 | 163 | 164 | |
| 71 | 159 | 169 | |
| 69 | 151 | 160 | |
| 69 | 159 | 160 |
We are looking for all data points for which the residual is greater than 2s=2(16.4)=32.8 or less than -32.8. Compare these values to the residuals in column 4 of the table. The only such data point is the student who had a grade of 65 on the third exam and 175 on the final exam; the residual for this student is 35.
Numerically and graphically, we have identified the point (65,175) as an outlier. We should re-examine the data for this point to see if there are any problems with the data. If there is an error we should fix the error if possible, or delete the data. If the data is correct, we would leave it in the data set. For this problem, we will suppose that we examined the data and found that this outlier data was an error. Therefore we will continue on to delete the outlier, so that we can explore how it affects the results, as a learning experience.
On the TI-83, TI-83+, TI-84+ calculators, delete the outlier from L1 and L2. Using the LinRegTTest, the new line of best fit and the correlation coefficient are:
The new line with
Using this new line of best fit (based on the remaining 10 data points), what would a student who receives a 73 on the third exam expect to receive on the final exam? Is this the same as the prediction made using the original line?
Using the new line of best fit
The original line predicted
Remember, we do not always delete an outlier. If upon examination, we determined this outlier to be a valid data point, we would leave it in the data.
(From The Consumer Price Indexes Web site) The Consumer Price Index
(CPI) measures the average change over time in the prices paid by urban consumers for
consumer goods and services. The CPI affects nearly all Americans because of the many ways
it is used. One of its biggest uses is as a measure of inflation. By providing information about
price changes in the Nation's economy to government, business, and labor, the CPI helps them
to make economic decisions. The President, Congress, and the Federal Reserve Board use the
CPI's trends to formulate monetary and fiscal policies. In the following table,
| 1915 | 10.1 |
| 1926 | 17.7 |
| 1935 | 13.7 |
| 1940 | 14.7 |
| 1947 | 24.1 |
| 1952 | 26.5 |
| 1964 | 31.0 |
| 1969 | 36.7 |
| 1975 | 49.3 |
| 1979 | 72.6 |
| 1980 | 82.4 |
| 1986 | 109.6 |
| 1991 | 130.7 |
| 1999 | 166.6 |
![]() |
In example 3, notice the pattern of the points compared to the line. Although the correlation coefficient is significant, the pattern in the scatterplot indicates that a curve would be a more appropriate model to use than a line. In this example, a statistician should prefer to use other methods to fit a curve to this data, rather than model the data with the line we found. In addition to doing the calculations, it is always important to look at the scatterplot when deciding whether a linear model is appropriate.
If you are interested in seeing more years of data for example 3, visit the Bureau of Labor Statistics CPI website ftp://ftp.bls.gov/pub/special.requests/cpi/cpiai.txt ; our data is taken from the column entitled "Annual Avg." (third column from the right). For example you could add more current years of data. Try adding the more recent years 2004 : CPI=188.9 and 2008 : CPI=215.3 and see how it affects the model.